Main Article Content

Authors

Introduction: Elderly functionality is conditioned by social, economic and cultural aspects. The Comfortable Gait Speed (cgs) is considered the most specific indicator of functional capacity, reflecting an associated Physiological Cost (fc). Under this scenario, the purpose of this research is to evaluate the Comfortable Gait Physiologic Cost (cgpc) according to Socioeconomic Status (ses) in self-reliant elderly. Materials and methods: 75 self-reliant elderly were classified into medium-low and medium-high SES levels. Each participant was asked to walk naturally for three minutes on an elliptical track. Traveled distance and heart rate were recorded every 15 seconds for the Physiological Cost Index (pci) calculation. Furthermore, the significant increase from baseline pci was established as the Critical Physiological Point (cpp). Results: There was no difference in the pci in relation to the sse (p = 0.885). However, it was higher in women (≈0,3 lat / m) when compared to men (≈ 0.2 beats/m; p < 0.001). The traveled distance was about 200 meters in both ses and gender, showing higher in the medium-low SES for the male versus the female group (p = 0.009). In women the cpp appears 15 seconds earlier in the medium-high ses, while in men the pci remains stable throughout the test. Conclusions: The ses does not influence the cgpc in self-reliant elderly; however gender is confirmed as the main factor in its translation. Methodological cpp inclusion is recommended given its relevance to the analysis of gait efficiency.

Paul Medina González, Universidad Católica del Maule

MSc. Departamento de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca-Chile.
Medina González, P. (2016). Psychological Cost of Comfortable Gait According to Socioeconomic Status in Self-Reliant Elderly in Talca, Chile. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 14(02), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.12804/revsalud14.02.2016.03

Chackiel J. La dinámica demográfica de América Latina. Serie población y desarrollo - Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. 2004; 52.

Huenchuan S. La protección de salud en el marco de la dinámica demográfica de los derechos. Serie población y desarrollo - Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. 2011; 100.

Weinert BT, Timiras PS. Invited review: Theories of aging. J Appl Physiol. 95(4):1706-16.

Mora T, González P. El Senama y las políticas públicas para el adulto mayor. Senama - Programa de seguridad social N.°3. 2011.

Arai H, Ouchi Y, Yokode M, Ito H, Uematsu H, Eto F, et al. Toward the realization of a better aged society: messages from gerontology and geriatrics. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(1):16-22.

Abdullah B, Wolbring G. Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Active Aging through the Lens of the 2002 World Health Organization Active Ageing Report: A Policy Framework and the 2010 Toronto

Charter for Physical Activity: A Global Call for Action. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(12): 6799-819.

Medina P, Mancilla E. Evolución de la locomoción bípeda humana: el nivel socioeconómico como factor ambiental. Antropo. 2014;32:15-24.

Subramanian SV, Delgado I, Jadue L, Vega J, Kawachi I. Income inequality and health: multilevel analysis of Chilean communities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57(11):844-8.

Rebato E, Susanne C, Chiarelli B. Para comprender la antropología biológica. Evolución y biología humana. 1.a ed. Navarra: Editorial Verbo Divino; 2005.

Adimark. Manual de aplicación del Nivel Socioeconómico Esomar. 2000.

Koster A, Penninx BW, Bosma H, Kempen GI, Harris TB, Newman AB, et al. Is there a biomedical explanation for socioeconomic differences in incident mobility limitation? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med

Sci. 2005;60(8):1022-7.

Saibene F, Minetti A. Biomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003;88:297-316.

Graham R, Smith N, White C. The reliability and validity of the physiological cost index in healthy subjects while walking on 2 different tracks. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2041-6.

Malatesta D, Simar D, Dauvilliers Y, Candau R, Borrani F, Prefaut C, et al. Energy cost of walking and gait instability in healthy 65- and 80-yr-olds. J Appl Physiol 2003;95(6):2248-56.

Gross M, Crane E, Fredrickson E. Effort shape and kinematic assessment of bodily expression of emotion during gait. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(1):202-21.

Hossack RF, Bruce RA. Maximal cardiac function in sedentary normal men and women: comparison of age-related changes. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982;53(4):799-804.

Troosters T, Gosselink R, Decramer M. Six-minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Eur Respir J. 1999;14:270-4.

Osses R, Yáñez J, Barría P, Palacios S, Dreyse J, Díaz O, et al. Prueba de caminata en seis minutos en sujetos chilenos sanos de 20 a 80 años. Rev Med Chile 2010; 138:1124-30.

Danielsson A, Willén C, Sunnerhagen KS. Measurement of energy cost by the physiological cost index in walking after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(10):1298-303.

LaPorte C, Johnson D, Koen K, Hardy L, Montgomery V. The effect of lower limb casting on energy cost during independent ambulation: considerations for clinical practice. IJAHSP. 2014;12:1

Cheng-Hsun Wu. Physiological Cost Index of Walking for Normal Adults. Department of Rehabilitation, Ten-Chen General Hospital, Jhongli. 2010.

Ministerio de Salud Chile. Programa de Salud del Adulto Mayor. División de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades. Subsecretaría de Salud Pública. Manual de Aplicación del Examen de Medicina

Preventiva del Adulto Mayor (empam). 2014.

Medina P. Confiabilidad de una metodología aplicable para la medición de cinemática simple del pie en adultos mayores autovalentes de la comunidad. Revista Biosalud 2014;13(1):9-20.

MacGregor J. The evaluation of patient performance using long-term ambulatory monitoring technique in the domiciliary environment. Physiotherapy. 1981;67(2):30-3.

Hood V, Granat M, Maxwell D, Hasler J. A new method of using heart rate to represent energy expenditure: the total heart beat index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1266-73.

Schrack J, Simonsick E, Ferrucci L. The energetic pathway to mobility loss: an emerging new framework for longitudinal studies of aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58 (suppl 2): S329-36.

Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3): M146-56.

Fritz S, Lusardi M. White paper: Walking speed: the sixth vital sign. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):46-9.

Servicio Nacional del Adulto Mayor de Chile. Estudio nacional de la dependencia en personas mayores. 2009.

Barbosa AR, Souza JMP, Lebrão ML, Laurenti R, Marucci MFN. Diferenças em limitações funcionais de idosos brasileiros de acordo com idade e sexo: dados da pesquisa SABE. Cad. Saúde Pública.

;21(4):1177-85.

Abramowitz MK, Hostetter TH, Melamed ML. Association of serum bicarbonate levels with gait speed and quadriceps strength in older adults. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58(1):29-38.

Toker Z. Walking beyond the Socioeconomic Status in an objectively and perceptually walkable pedestrian environment. Urban Studies Research. 2015:1-15.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.