Contenido principal del artículo

Elena Colasanti
Jhonatan Navarro-Loli
Marcos Marino
Leonardo Adrián Medrano

Objetivo: adaptar y validar un instrumento para evaluar barreras a la adherencia antirretroviral en personas que conviven con el vih en Córdoba (Argentina). Materiales y métodos: la muestra final incluyó 180 participantes argentinos. La media de edad fue de 40.61 (de = 12.032) y el 82.8 % fueron hombres. Sobre la muestra (n = 180) se efectuaron estudios de estructura interna, confiabilidad y validez con otras variables. Resultados: el análisis factorial confirmatorio arrojó resultados congruentes con la estructura factorial del estudio original, aunque para ello fue necesario eliminar ciertos ítems que presentaban bajas cargas factoriales
y que pueden ser representados por otros ítems, debido a información redundante. Se obtuvieron coeficientes ω = 0.833 en la subescala información; ω = 0.759 en la subescala motivación, y ω = 0.888 en la subescala habilidades comportamentales. Se encontraron correlaciones significativas entre los resultados de adherencia al tratamiento y barreras al tratamiento. Conclusión: aunque se requieren de mayores investigaciones, los resultados son promisorios, sugieren que el instrumento puede usarse para evaluar barreras de la adherencia al tratamiento antirretroviral en Córdoba.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Colasanti, E., Navarro-Loli, J. ., Marino, M., & Medrano, L. A. (2023). Propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento de evaluación de barreras para la adherencia al tratamiento antirretroviral en población argentina. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 21(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.10943

Altice F, Evuarherhe O, Shina S, Carter G, Beaubrun AC. Adherence to hiv treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:475-90. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s192735

World Health Organization. hiv aids [Internet]. [Cited 2020 Jul 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hiv-aids

Villa IC, Vinaccia S. Therapeutic adherence and associated psychological variables in patients diagnosed with hiv-aids. Psychol Health. 2006;16(1):51-62.

Peng Z, Yu Y, Wei W, Hou Y, Sun Z, Wang Y, et al. Reliability and validity of the lifewindows information-motivation-behavioral skills antiretroviral therapy adherence questionnaire among hiv+ patients in Shanghai. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020; 14:507-15. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s234041

Joint United Nations Program on hiv/aids [unaids]. Our action. 90-90-90: Treatment for all. [internet]. [Cited 2021 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/es/resources/909090

Ortego C, Huedo-Medina TB, Llorca J, Sevilla L, Santos P, Rodríguez E, et al. Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (haart): a meta-analysis. aids Behav. 2011;15(7):1381-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9942-x

Mattos-Costa JD, Silva-Torres T, Esteves-Coelho L, Mendes-Luz P. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy for hiv/aids in Latin America and the Caribbean: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Int AIDS Society. 2018;21(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25066

Fisher JD, Amico KR, Fisher WA, Harman JJ. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model of antiretroviral adherence and its applications. Curr hiv/aids Rep. 2008;5(4):193-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-008-0028-y

Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):462-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.462

Bontempi JMB, Burleson L, Lopez MH. hiv medication adherence programs: the importance of social support. J Community Health Nurs. 2004;21(2):111-22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327655jchn2102_05

Jones D, Cook R, Rodriguez A, Waldrop-Valverde D. Personal hiv knowledge, appointment adherence and hiv outcomes. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(1):242-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0367-y

Miller LG, Liu H, Hays RD, Golin CE, Ye Z, Beck CK, et al. Knowledge of antiretroviral

regimen dosing and adherence: a longitudinal study. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(4):514-18. https://doi.org/10.1086/367857

World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term treatments. Tests for action.

Washington (dc): Pan American Health Organization (Noncommunicable Diseases Unit); 2004. Available from: https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2012/WHO-Adherence-Long-Term-Therapies-Spa-2003.pdf

Varela-Arévalo MT, Salazar-Torres IC, Correa-Sánchez D. Adherencia al tratamiento en la infección por vih/sida: consideraciones teóricas y metodológicas para su abordaje. Act Colom Psicol. 2008;11(2):101-13.

Wasti SP, Simkhada P, Randall J, Freeman JV, van Teijlingen E. Factors influencing adherence to antiretroviral treatment in Nepal: a mixed-methods study. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035547

Simoni JM, Frick PA, Huang B. A longitudinal evaluation of a social support model of medication adherence among hiv-positive men and women on antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006;25(1):74-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.74

DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2004;23(2):207-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207

DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. 2nd ed. San Francisco (ca): John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Horvath KJ, Smolenski D, Amico KR. An empirical test of the information-motivation-behavioral skills model of art adherence in a sample of hiv-positive persons primarily in out-of-hiv-care settings. AIDS Care. 2014;26(2):142-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.802283

Ladero-Martín L, Orejudo-Hernández S, Carrobles-Isabel JA. Self-efficacy, effort, and expectations of control in adherence to antiretroviral treatment in hiv+ patients in a methadone maintenance program. Health Drugs. 2008;8(1):73-91. https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v8i1.68.

The LifeWindows Project Team. The Life Windows Information Motivation Behavioral Skills ART Adherence Questionnaire (lw-imb-aaq). Center for Health, Intervention, and Prevention. University of Connecticut; 2006.

Chitra L, Gnanadurai A. Anti-retroviral therapy adherence among women living with hiv in Coimbatore District of Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Innov Res Dev. 2015;4(1):15-8.

Dima AL, Schweitzer A-M, Amico KR, Wanless RS. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model of art adherence in Romanian young adults. J hiv aids Soc Serv. 2013;12(3-4):274-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2012.749819

Peltzer K, Friend-du Preez N, Ramlagan S, Anderson J. Antiretroviral treatment adherence among hiv patients in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(111):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-111

Zeleke AB. Evaluation of the impact of the information-motivation-behavioural skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in Ethiopia [PhD thesis on internet]. Universidad de Sudáfrica; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19649

Jones D, Cook R, Cecchini D, Sued O, Bofill L, Weiss S, et al. Examining adherence

among challenging patients in public and private hiv care in Argentina. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(9):1619-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1037-7

Casullo MM. La evaluación psicológica: modelos, técnicas y contextos. Rev Iberoam Diagn Eval Psicol. 2009;27(1):9-28.

Santillán-Torres-Torija C, Villagrán-Vázquez G, Robles-Montijo SS, Eguiluz-Romo L de L. The information and motivation and behavioral skills model of art adherence among hiv-positive adults in Mexico. J Int Assoc Provid aids Care. 2015;14(4):335-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325957415581903

Flora DB, Flake JK. The purpose and practice of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in psychological research: decision for scale development and validation. Can J Behav Sci. 2017;49(2):78-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000069

Schmitt TA. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2011;29(4):304-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406653

Benetucci A, Kásparas G, Wainstein C. Adherencia al tarv. En the argentine society of infectious diseases, V Argentine consensus on antiretroviral therapy 2014-2015. Buenos Aires: Guadalupe Editions; 2015. p. 31-9.

Schlomer GL, Brauman S, Card NA. Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2010;57(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082

World Medical Association. Declaration of helsinki ethical principle for medical research involving human subjects. jama. 2013;310(20):2191-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Knobel H, Alonso J, Casado JL, Collazos J, González J, Ruiz I, et al. Validation of a simplified medication adherence questionnaire in a large cohort of hiv-infected patients: the geema study. aids. 2002;16(4):605-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200203080-00012

Ahumada M, Escalante E, Santiago I. Estudio preliminar de las relaciones entre las estrategias de afrontamiento y el apoyo social con la adherencia al tratamiento de personas que viven con vih/sida. Subj Procesos Cogn. 2011;15(1):55-70.

Montero I, León OG. Guide to naming research studies in psychology. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2007;7(3):847-62. Available from: http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/

Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Versión 7 [Software]. Los Angeles (ca): Muthén & Muthén; 2012.

Muthén BO. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika. 1984;49(1):115-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294210

Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 48(3):936-49. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

DiStefano C, Morgan GB. A comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Struct Equ Modeling. 2014;21(3):425-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915373

Bandalos DL. Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Struct Equ Modeling. 2008;15(2):211-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510801922340

Pérez E, Medrano L. Análisis factorial exploratorio: bases conceptuales y metodológicas. Rev Argent Cienc Comport. 2010;2(1):58-66.

Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Steiger JH. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Pers Individ Differ. 2007;42(5):893-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017

DiStefano C, Liu J, Jiang N, Shi D. Examination of the weighted root mean square residual: evidence for trusworthiness? Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(3):453-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1390394

Domínguez-Lara S, Merino-Soto C. Evaluación de las malas especificaciones en modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Rev Argent Cienc Comport. 2018;10(2):19-24. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v10.n2.19595

Whittaker TA. Using the modification index and standardized expected parameter

change for model modification. J Exp Educ. 2012;80(1):26-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.531299

Domínguez-Lara S. Errores correlacionados y estimación de la fiabilidad de estudios de validación: comentarios al trabajo de validación de la escala ehealth literacy (eheals) en población universitaria española. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2016;90:e1-e2.

Raykov T. Bias in coefficient alpha for fixed congeneric measures with correlated errors. Appl Psychol Meas. 2001;25(1):69-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216010251005

Raykov T. Point and interval estimation of reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments via linear constraint covariance structure modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 2004;11(3):452-83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103

Gadermann AM, Guhn M, Zumbo BD. Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2012;17(3):1-13. https://doi.org/10.7275/n560-j767

Greco LM, O’Boyle EH, Cockburn BS, Yuan Z. Meta-analysis of coefficient alpha: a reliability generalization study. J Manag Stud. 2018;55(4):583-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12328

Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol: Res Pract. 2009;40(5):532-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808

Gravetter F, Wallnau L. Essentials of statistics for the behavioral science. 8th ed. Belmont (ca): Wadsworth; 2014.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association,

National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (dc): American Educational Research Association; 2014.

Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: algunas consideraciones adicionales [Exploratory factor analysis of the items: some additional considerations]. An. Psicol. 2014;30(3),1170-5. https://doi.org/0.6018/analesps.30.3.199991

Gu F, Little TD, Kingston NM. Misestimation of reliability using coefficient alpha and structural equation modeling when assumptions of tau-equivalence and uncorrelated errors are violated. Methodol. 2013;9(1):30-40. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000052

Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernández-Baeza A, Tomás-Marco I. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. An. Psicol. 2014;30(3):1151-69. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361

Charter RA, Feldt LS. Meaning of reliability in terms of correct and incorrect clinical decisions: the art of decision making is still alive. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23(4):530-7. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.23.4.530.1227

Glover TA, Albers CA. Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. J Sch Psychol. 2007;45(2):117-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005

Pérez, D. Revisión del concepto de causalidad en el marco del análisis factorial confirmatorio. Rev Iberoam Diagn Eval Psicol. 2020;54(1):103-17. https://doi.org/10.21865/ridep54.1.09

Detalles del artículo