Priorización estratégica de proyectos energéticos bajo criterios multidimensionales:  caso estudio Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas Grupo EPM

Juan David Sánchez Arredondo; Jaime Andrés Vieira Salazar

doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.15963

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

Priorização estratégica de projetos de energia sob critérios multidimensionais
estudo de caso da Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas Grupo EPM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.15963

PDF (Español (España))

Publicado: ago 19, 2026

Edição: v. 28 n. 52 (2026)

Seção Artículo de investigación científica y tecnológica

Palavras-chave: Sustentabilidade energética Priorização de projetos Metodologia multicritério Processo analítico hierárquico Governança corporativa

Autores

Juan David Sánchez Arredondo
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Jaime Andrés Vieira Salazar
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Resumo

A priorização de projetos no setor elétrico exige ferramentas metodológicas que combinem critérios técnicos, econômicos, ambientais, sociais e de governança. Objetivo: este artigo apresenta o desenvolvimento de um modelo de tomada de decisão multicritério que integra efetivamente critérios de sustentabilidade, garantindo a priorização alinhada à estratégia organizacional da Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas S.A. E.S.P. BIC. Metodologia: foi desenvolvido um modelo exploratório-descritivo baseado em um estudo de caso. Ele combina uma revisão sistemática da literatura, entrevistas semiestruturadas e a técnica Delphi para alcançar consenso e validar os critérios. Principais resultados: o modelo foi implementado utilizando o processo analítico hierárquico ahppara ponderar e classificar os critérios e foi validado conceitualmente junto a profissionais da organização. Conclusões: o modelo resultante está alinhado aos objetivos corporativos e às regulamentações do setor para melhorar a transparência, a rastreabilidade e a sustentabilidade nas decisões estratégicas.

Como Citar

Sánchez Arredondo, J. D., & Vieira Salazar, J. A. (2026). Priorização estratégica de projetos de energia sob critérios multidimensionais: estudo de caso da Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas Grupo EPM. Revista Universidad Y Empresa, 28(52), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.15963

Referências

Asadabadi, M. R., Chang, E., & Saberi, M. (2019). Are mcdm methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (ahp) and Analytic Network Process (anp). Cogent Engineering, 6(1), 1623153. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153

Badhon, B., Chakrabortty, R. K., Anavatti, S. G., & Vanhoucke, M. (2025). iraf-brb: An explainable ai framework for enhanced interpretability in project risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 285, 127979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127979

Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4 Blohm, M., & Dettner, F. (2023). Green hydrogen production: Integrating environmental and social criteria to ensure sustainability. Smart Energy, 11, 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2023.100112

Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5

Büyüközkan, G., & Güleryüz, S. (2016). An integrated dematel-anp approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.015

Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas S. A. E. S. P. (chec). (2021). Informe de gestión ambiental y social 2021.

Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas S. A. E. S. P. (chec). (2024). Plan de Empresa chec 2024.

Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas S. A. E. S. P. (chec]. (2025, 11 de marzo). Informe de sostenibilidad chec 2024 (Unificado). Ćirović, G., & Pamučar, D. (2022). Multiple-criteria decision making. mdpi. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-2816-8

Danesh, D., Ryan, M. J., & Abbasi, A. (2018). Multi-criteria decision-making methods for project portfolio management: A literature review. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 17(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmdm.2018.088813

Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria optimization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27659-9

Garfan, S., Alamoodi, A. H., Sulaiman, S., Albahri, O. S., Albahri, A. S., & Sharaf, I. M. (2025). Multicriteria decision-making framework for robust energy management ai solutions. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100822

Grupo EPM. (2023). Informe de sostenibilidad 2023. Grupo Empresas Públicas de Medellín. https://www.grupo-epm.com/content/dam/Grupo-Epm/aguas-nacionales/nuestra-gestion/informes-de-sostenibilidad/informe-sostenibilidad-2023.pdf

Hendiani, S., Torkayesh, A. E., Venghaus, S., & Walther, G. (2025). Leading the green charge: A novel type-2 fuzzy vikor method applied to eco-conscious freight transport. Expert Systems with Applications, 285, 128082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128082

Hosouli, S., & Hassani, R. A. (2024). Application of multi-criteria decision making (mcdm) model for solar plant location selection. Results in Engineering, 24(103162), 103162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103162

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

Ika, L. A., & Donnelly, J. (2017). Erratum to “Success conditions for international development capacity building projects”. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1022- 1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.007

Jamwal, A., Palit, N., Kumari, S., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, M. (2025). A decision framework for smes to address sustainability issues with Industry 4.0 technologies. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-025-06560-5

Janmontree, J., Shinde, A., Zadek, H., Trojahn, S., & Ransikarbum, K. (2025). A strategic hydrogen supplier assessment using a hybrid mcda framework with a game theory-driven criteria analysis. Energies, 18(13), 3508. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18133508

Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=GPE6ZAqGrnoC

Khan, K., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Dembińska, I., & Ioppolo, G. (2022). Most relevant sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure projects—ahp analysis for the Gulf States. Sustainability, 14(22), 14717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214717

Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multi criteria decision making (mcdm) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2016.11.191

Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M. D., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications - A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516-571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139

Mayor, J., Botero, S., & González-Ruiz, J. D. (2016). Modelo de decisión multicriterio difuso para la selección de contratistas en proyectos de infraestructura: caso Colombia. Obras y Proyectos, 20, 56-74. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-28132016000200005

Mukhametzyanov, I. (2021). Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in mcdm problems: Entropy, critic and sd. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 76-105. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402076i

Munda, G. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. En J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (pp. 953-986). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_23

Naciones Unidas. (1992). Declaración de Río sobre el Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo. Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo. https://www.un.org/spanish/esa/sustdev/agenda21/riodeclaration.htm

Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill. https://openlibrary.org/works/OL15145472W/The_analytic_hierarchy_process

Şahin, M. (2020). A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the selection of electricity generation technologies. Energy, 213, 118815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118815

Seo, S., Kim, G., Park, J.-B., Kim, J., Park, Y.-B., & Chung, M. (2025). Leveraging data-driven machine learning techniques to enhance bearing capacity estimation in prebored and precast piles. Expert Systems with Applications, 285, 128070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128070

Skiba, M., Mrówczyńska, M., Sztubecka, M., Maciejko, A., & Rzeszowska, N. (2023). The European Union’s Energy Policy Efforts Regarding Emission Reduction in Cities—A Method Proposal. Energies, 16, 6123. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176123

Ugwu, O. O., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Wong, A., & Ng, S. T. (2006). Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (susaip) Part 1: Development of indicators and computational methods. Automation in Construction, 15(2), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.05.006

United Nations. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf

Wang, C.-N., Chung, Y.-C., Wibowo, F. D., Dang, T.-T., & Nguyen, N.-A.-T. (2025). The planning of best site selection for wind energy in Indonesia: A synergistic approach using data envelopment analysis and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making. Energies, 18, 4176. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154176

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2.ª ed.). Sage. https://books.google. com/books?id=AvYOAQAAMAAJ

Zhang, X., & Sadiq, K. (2026). Evaluating economic, geographic, and strategic drivers of China’s renewable energy investments: Insights from bri and institutional perspectives. Renewable Energy, 256, 123848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123848

Estatísticas de consulta