Main Article Content

Authors

Several well-recognized cities in the world have leaped to outstanding levels of economicand social development leveraged by specific breakthrough drivers. For the region ofPoitou-Charentes in France, the presence of the Futuroscope Amusement Park in the cityof Poitiers has become a significant tourist attraction that now produces a dilemma. Is thisinfrastructure sufficient for assembling the “Grand Poitiers Technopole” as a successfulhigh-technology cluster? To reach the conditions to assemble this high-tech cluster, theregion must have the potential to articulate, manage and govern aggressive innovationstrategies. Following the results of a study of several innovative cities around the globe, basic enablingmechanisms were found that have broken with the conventional growth paradigms withatypical breakthrough innovations, and have now achieved world-class disrupting performances,a global branding and status as successful poles of technological innovation. Theresults obtained show the features of the existing technopole as the ones to enhance inorder to have a world-class positioning for the region.

Carlos Scheel, Monterrey Institute of Technology Monterrey

Professor, Egade Business School, Monterrey Institute of Technology Monterrey, Mexico.

Daniel D. Bretones, Université Centre Val de Loire

Université Centre Val de Loire / Escem, France.
Scheel, C., & Bretones, D. D. (2012). The Impact of Technology-based Clusters on Regional Development: The Case of the Grand Poitiers Futuroscope Technopole. Revista Universidad Y Empresa, 13(20), 11–43. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/empresa/article/view/1866

Carrillo, F. (2004). “Capital Cities: A Taxonomy of Capital Accounts for Knowledge Cities”. In: Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (5): 28-46.

Dvir, R., & E. Pasher (2004). “Innovation Engines for Knowledge Cities: An Innovation Ecology Perspective”. In: Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (5): 16-27.

Edvinsson, L. (2006). “Aspects on the City as a Knowledge Tool”. In: Journal of Knowledge Management, 10 (5): 6-13.

Ergazakis, K., K. Metaxiotis & J. Psarras (2004). “Towards Knowledge Cities: Conceptual Analysis and Success Stories”. In: Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (5): 5-15.

Feldman, M. & D. Audretsch (1999). “Innovation in Cities: Sciencebased Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition”. In: European Economic Review, 43 (2): 409-429.

Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the Creative Class. New York: Routledge Florida, R. & G.

Gates (2003). “Technology and Tolerance: The Importance of Diversity to High-technology Growth”. In: T. Clark (ed.). The City as an Entertainment Machine. Amsterdam, San Diego: Elsevier.

Florida, R., C. Mellander & K. Stolarick (2008). “Inside the Black Box of Regional Development - Human Capital, The Creative Class and Tolerance”. In: Journal of Economic Geography, 8 (5): 615-649.

Human Development Reports (2010). Statistics: Human Development Index. Retrieved from .

Porter, M. (1990/1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

Scheel, C. (2011). Innovacities: In Search of Breakthrough Innovations, and Disruptive Performances. In process of printing.

Scott, A. (2006). “Creative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions”. In: Journal of Urban Affairs, 28 (1): 1-17

Wiggins, J. & D. Gibson (2003). “Overview of US Incubators and the Case of the Austin Technology Incubator”. In: International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3 (1): 56-66.

World Bank (2010). Knowledge Assessment Methodology. Retrieved from

Yigitcanlar, T., K. Velibeyoglu & C. Martinez (2008). “Rising Knowledge Cities: The Role of Urban Knowledge Precincts”. In: Journal of Knowledge Management, 12 (5): 8-20.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.