Contenido principal del artículo

Pablo López-Silva

En el contexto de la comprensión de la interacción organismo–medio ambiente, el concepto de affordance designa las diversas oportunidades para la acción a las que la percepción de un objeto invita. Cuando miramos un muro, no solo percibimos sus propiedades físicas brutas (color, tamaño, localización, etc.), sino también ciertas cualidades, como que es escalable, dependiendo del contexto en que tal percepción ocurra. Dicha noción de escalabilidad integrada en mi percepción del muro es una affordance. Durante los últimos años, este concepto se ha vuelto popular en diversas disciplinas; sin embargo, no ha estado acompañado de un desarrollo unificado y preciso de su comprensión. Este artículo formula y examina algunos de los debates más fundamentales que rodean el entendimiento actual de dicho concepto. Luego de evaluar críticamente algunas de las ideas más paradigmáticas dentro de estas discusiones, se proponen algunos desafíos que enfrenta el desarrollo del término para, finalmente, explorar algunas formas en que se pueden afrontar tales desafíos.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Aronson, E., Wilson, T., & Akert, R. (2017). Social psychology. New York: Pearson.

Bayne, T. (2008). The phenomenology of mental agency. Philosophy Compass 3/1, 182-202. Doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00122.x

Bayne, T. (2011). The sense of agency. En F. Macpherson (Ed.), The senses (pp. 355-374). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brincker, M. (2014). Navigating beyond “here & now” affordances —on sensorimotor maturation and “false belief” performance. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1433.

Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585-1599.

Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2010). Neural Mechanisms for Interacting with a World Full of Action Choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience, (33), 269-98.

Cisek, P., & Pezzulo, G. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 414-424.

Conrad K. (1958). Die beginnende Schizophrekenie. Versuch einer Gestaltanalyse des Wahns. Stuttgart: Thieme.

De Haan, S., & De Bruin, L. (2010). Reconstructing the minimal self, or how to make sense of agency and ownership. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9, 373-396.

Dreyfus, H. (2002). Intelligence without representation Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367-383.

Dreyfus, H., & Kelly, S. D. (2007). Heterophenomenology: Heavy-handed sleight-of-hand. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 413-425.

Fuchs, T. (2005). Delusional mood and delusional perception. A phenomenological analysis. Psychopathology, 38, 133-139.

Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Chi’91 Conference Proceedings, 79-84.

Gendler, T. (2008). Alief in action (and reaction). Mind & Language, 23, 552-585.

Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.

Gibson, E. J. (1982). The concept of affordances in development: The renascence of functionalism. En W. A. Collins (ed.), The concept of development. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (pp. 55-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Heras-Escribano, M., & Pinedo-García, D. (2018). Affordances and landscapes: Overcoming the nature-culture dichotomy through niche construction theory. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2294.

Horton. T., Chakraborty, A., & Amant, R. (2012). Affordances for robots: A brief survey. Avant, 3. 70-84.

Howes O. D., & Nour M. (2016). Dopamine and the aberrant salience hypothesis of schizophrenia. World Psychiatry, 15(1), 3-4.

Inglod, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Kapur S. (2003). Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: A framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 13-23.

Jenkins, H. (2008). Gibson’s “affordances”: Evolution of a pivotal concept. Journal of Scientific Psychology, 34-45.

Kornell. N, Son, L., & Terrace, H. (2007). Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychological Science, 18(1), 64-71.

Krueger, J. (2011). Doing things with music. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, (10), 1-22. Kusters W. (2014). Filosofie van de waanzin. Lemniscaat: Holland.

McClelland, T. (2015). Affording introspection: An alternative model of inner awareness. Phil Studies. Online first. Doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0421-x

McClelland, T. (2017a). ai and affordances for mental action. Proceedings of the AISB Annual Convention 2017, 372-379.

McClelland, T. (2017b). The mental affordance

hypothesis. Minds Online. Recuperado de http://mindsonline.philosophyofbrains. com/2017/2017-session-1/the-mental-affordance-hypothesis/

McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving the concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Recuperado de

Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Weiskopf, N., & Doeller, C. F. (2004). Motor affordance and its role for visual working memory: Evidence from FMRI studies. Experimental Psychology, 51(4), 258-269.

Michaels, C. F. (2003). Affordances: Four points of debate. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 135-148.

Montesano, L., Lopes, M., Bernardino, A., & Santos-Victor, J. (2008). Learning object affordances: From sensory-motor coordination to imitation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(1), 15-26. Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions and designs. Interactions, 38-43.

Payne, E. (2013). Speaking to my madness. USA: CreateSpace.

Prinz, J. (2012). The Conscious Mind. Oxford: OUP. Proust, J. (2016). The evolution of primate communication and metacommunication. Mind & Language, 31(2), 177-203.

Ratcliffe, M. (2013). Delusional atmosphere and the sense of unreality. In Stanghellini, G., & Fuchs, T. (Eds.), One Century of Karl Jaspers’General Psychopathology (pp. 229-244.). Oxford: Ox- ford University Press.

Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein. J (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325-352. Doi: 10.1080/10407413.2014.958035

Roiser, P., Howes, O., Chaddock, C., & Joyce, M. (2013). Neural and behavioral correlates of aberrant salience in individuals at risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(6), 1328-1336.

Scarantino, A. (2003). Affordances explained. Phi- losophy of Science, 70, 949-961.

Seifert, L., Wattebled, L., Herault, R., Poizat, G., Adé, D., Gal-Petitfaux, N., & Davids, K. (2014). Neurobiological degeneracy and affordance perception support functional intra-individual variability of interlimb coordination during ice climbing. Plos One, 9(2), e89865.

Siegel, S. (2010). The contents of visual experience. New York: Oxford University Press.

Siegel, S. (2014). Affordances and the contents of perception. En B. Brogaard (Ed.), Does perception have content? (pp. 39-76). New York: Oxford University Press.

Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecol. Psychol. 4, 173-187. Doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3

Vera, A. H., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7-48. Doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1701_2

Walsh, D. M. (2015). Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/ CBO9781316402719

Withagen, R., De Poel, H., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 250-258.

Detalles del artículo