Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M. A., & Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). IBM® SPSS® Amos™ 22 User’s Guide. Amos Development Corporation. https://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/pdfs/SPSS_Amos_User_Guide_22.pdf
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. (2020). A multicomponent model of working memory. En R. H. Logie, V. Camos & N. Cowan (Eds.), Working memory: State of the science (pp. 10-43). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842286.003.0002
Ballesteros, S. (2014). La atención selectiva modula el procesamiento de la información y la memoria implícita. Acción Psicológica, 11(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.5944/AP.1.1.13788
Ballesteros, S., Reales, J. M., García, E., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Selective attention affects implicit and explicit memory for familiar pictures at different delay conditions. Psicothema, 18(1), 88-99. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/8401/8265
Barreyro, J. P., Cevasco, J., Burín, D., & Marotto, C. M. (2012). Working memory capacity and individual differences in the making of reinstatement and elaborative inferences. The SpanishJournal of Psychology, 15(2), 471-479. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38857
Barreyro, J. P., & Flores, M. L. (2018). Memoria de trabajo, comprensión de textos y generación de inferencias en adolescentes tempranos. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 33, 1-16. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/177711
Barreyro, J. P., Injoque-Ricle, I., Álvarez-Drexler, A., Formoso, J., & Burin, D. I. (2017). Generación de inferencias explicativas en la comprensión de textos expositivos: el rol de la memoria de trabajo y el conocimiento previo específico. Suma Psicológica, 24(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2016.09.002
Barreyro, J. P., Injoque-Ricle, I., Formoso, J., & Burin, D. I. (2019). Computerized working memory battery (BIMET-V): Studying the relation between working memory, verbal reasoning and reading comprehension. Trends in Psychology, 27(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.1-05
Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1992). Tests de aptitudes diferenciales DAT: Manual Forma T. Paidós.
Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22674
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850-859. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571312
Cornoldi, C., & Oakhill, J. V. (2013). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Routledge.
Cortada de Kohan, N. (2004). Baires. Test de aptitud verbal. Buenos Aires. TEA Editores. https://web.teaediciones.com/Ejemplos/BAIRES_extracto_manual.pdf
Currie, N. K., & Cain, K. (2015). Children’s inference generation: The role of vocabulary and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.005
Currie, N. K., & Muijselaar, M. M. L. (2019). Inference making in young children: The concurrent and longitudinal contributions of verbal working memory and vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1416-1431. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000342
Daugaard, H. T., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2017). From words to text: Inference making mediates the role of vocabulary in children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 30, 1773-1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9752-2
Georgiou, G. K., & Das, J. P. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of executive function on reading comprehension in young adults. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12091
Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L. (1998). The construction of causal inferences while reading expository texts on science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 247-269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_4
Hair, F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice Hall.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness (N.° 6). Harvard University Press.
Kendeou, P., & Trevors, G. (2012). Quality learning from texts we read: What does it take? En J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 251-275). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048224.016
Kendeou, P., Van Den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of reading comprehension: Implications for reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12025
Kieffer, M. J., Vukovic, R. K., & Berry, D. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth-grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.54
Kim, Y. S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4.a ed.). The Guilford Press.
Logie, R. H., Camos, V., & Cowan, N. (2020). The state of the science of working memory: An introduction. En R. H. Logie, V. Camos & N. Cowan (Eds.), Working memory: State of the science (pp. 1-9). Oxford University Press.
MacDonald, M. C., & Hsiao, Y. (2018). Sentence comprehension. En S. A. Rueschemeyer & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (Vol. 2., pp. 171-196). Oxford University Press.
Magimairaj, B. M., Nagaraj, N. K., & Benafield, N. (2020). Comparison of auditory, language, memory, and attention abilities in children with and without listening difficulties. American Journal of Audiology, 29(4), 710-727. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00018
Martin, R. C. (2021). The critical role of semantic working memory in language comprehension and production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214219951
Martin, R. C., Rapp, B., & Purcell, J. (2020). Domain-specific working memory: Perspectives from cognitive neuropsychology. En R. H. Logie, N. Cowan & V. Camos (Eds.), Working memory: State of the science (pp. 235-281). Oxford University Press.
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025250
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336895
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2019). Reading comprehension and reading comprehension difficulties. En D. Kilpatrick, R. Joshi & R. Wagner (Eds.), Reading Development and Difficulties (pp. 83-115). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26550-2_5
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. En D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47-71). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008
Pérez, A. I., Paolieri, D., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2014). The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 15(3), 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0611-7
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Posner, M. I., & Driver, J. (1992). The neurobiology of selective attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2(2), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(92)90006-7
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (1998). Attention, self-regulation, and consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1915-1927. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0344
Ray, M. N., & Meyer, B. J. F. (2011). Individual differences in children’s knowledge of expository text structures: A review of literature. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 67-82. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068612
Richard’s, M., Canet Juric, L., Introzzi, I., & Urquijo, S. (2014). Intervención diferencial de las funciones ejecutivas en inferencias elaborativas y puente. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 32(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl32.1.2014.01
Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2020). Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068
Singer, M., & O’Connell, G. (2003). Robust inference processes in expository text comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 607-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/095414400340000079
Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24(6), 733-743. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201098
Soprano, A. M. (2009). Cómo evaluar la atención y las funciones ejecutivas en niños y adolescentes. Paidós.
Van Den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. (2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment: Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School Psychology Review, 41(3), 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087512
Van Den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1418
Van Den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. C. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. En J. Otero, J. A. Leon & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131-154). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Van Dyke, J. A., Johns, C. L., & Kukona, A. (2014). Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension. Cognition, 131(3), 373-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.007
Was, C. A., & Woltz, D. J. (2007). Reexamining the relationship between working memory and comprehension: The role of available longterm memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JML.2006.07.008
Wechsler, D. (2003). WAIS III: Test de Inteligencia para Adultos. Paidós.
Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., Jaeger, A. J., Jarosz, A. F., Cushen, P. J., & Thiede, K. W. (2016). Improving metacomprehension accuracy in an undergraduate course context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(4), 393-405.https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000096
Juan Pablo Barreyro
