Main Article Content

Authors

Cities in the global South have received attention in global governance and sustainability discussions. This seems to be a logical result, considering that most people in the world live in
them. In particular, Medellín has received important attention thanks to a series of urban interventions
related to the improvement of different aspects of the quality of life of its inhabitants. In this article we discuss how governance is materialized and takes different shapes depending on the conditions and actors in each specific case. Additionally, we explore the case of Juan Bobo, a housing consolidation pilot project that took place in the city of Medellín. Through this case, we try to understand how governance takes shape under informal conditions and
how can different functional combinations of governance styles be achieved to solve some of the problems that affect self-built neighborhoods in the city.

Edwar Calderon, Universidad EAFIT

Centro de estudios urbanos y medioambientales URBAM. Investigador postdoctoral y docente

Adolfo Eslava

Profesor Asociado del Departamento de Gobierno y Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad EAFIT.

Santiago Mejia-Dugand, Centro de Estudios Urbanos y Ambientales URBAM, EAFIT

Senior Researcher
Urbam - Centro de Estudios Urbanos y Ambientales
Calderon, E., Eslava, A., & Mejia-Dugand, S. (2020). Informality in Medellín through the Lens of Governance. Territorios, (43), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/territorios/a.8286

Abrams, P. (1988), Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977). Journal of Historical Sociology, 1: 58–89.

Aguilar Villanueva, L. F. (2013). Gobierno y administración pública. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Alcaldía de Medellín (2006). Proyecto Urbano Integral Nororiental.

Alcaldía de Medellín (2011) Laboratorio Medellín: Catálogo de diez prácticas vivas. Mesa Editores. Medellín, 2011.

Alcaldía de Medellín. (2018). Diez años construyendo juntos Cultura Ciudadana en Medellín. Medellín: Municipio de Medellín.

Bansard, J.S., Pattberg, P.H., Widerberg, O., 2017. Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements 17: 229-246.

Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2005). Social Capital, Moral Sentiments, and Community Governance. En H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, & E. Fehr, Moral Sentiments and Material Interests. The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life (págs. 379-398). Cambridge: MIT.

Bulkeley, H., Betsill, M.M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics 14(1): 42-63.

Castán Broto, V., Bulkeley, H., 2013. A survey of urban climate experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change 23: 92-102.

Conferencia Mundial de Ciudades y Migrantes (2018) https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/concept_note_ciudades_y_migrantes.pdf [último acceso Marzo 11 de 2019]

Corporación Latinobarómetro. (2018). Informe Latinobarómetro 2018. Santiago de Chile: BID - INTAL - CAF.

Duncan, G., & Eslava, A. (2015). Territorio, crimen, comunidad. Medellín: EAFIT.

Durrant, R., Barnes, J., Kern, F., Mackerron, G., 2018. The acceleration of transitions to urban sustainability: a case study of Brighton and Hove. European Planning Studies 26(8): 1537-1558.

Echeverri, A. Orsini, F. (2011) Informalidad y urbanismo social en Medellín. Medellín: EAFIT.

Eslava, A. (2017). Políticos, técnicos y comunidades. Medellín: EAFIT.

Fukuyama, F., & Colby, S. (2011). Half a miracle. Foreign Policy, 25. Recuperado el 23 de X de 2018, de http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/04/25/half-a-miracle/

Giraldo, J., & Preciado, A. (2015). Medellín, from Theater of War to Security Laboratory. Stability. International Journal of Security and Development, 4(1), Art. 34.

Giraldo, J., Casas, A., Eslava, A., & Méndez, N. (2013). Valores, representaciones y capital social en Antioquia 2013. Medellín: EAFIT - Gobernación de Antioquia - SURA.

Güemes, C. (2016). Trátame suavemente: confianza social en Latinoamérica, Argentina bajo la lupa. San José, Costa Rica: FLACSO.

Hansen, T., Coenen, L., 2015. The geography of sustainability transitions: review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 92-109.

Hillman, K., Nilsson, M., Rickne, A., Magnusson, T., 2011. Fostering sustainable technologies – A framework for analysing the governance of innovation systems. Science and Public Policy 38(5): 403-415.

Hodson, M., Marvin, S., 2010. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy 39: 477-485.

Jessop, B. (2016) The State: Past, Present, Future The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.

Kousky, C., Schneider, S.H., 2003. Global climate policy: Will cities lead the way? Climate Policy 3(4): 359-372.

Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B., 2012. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41: 955-967.

Meuleman, L., Niestry, I., 2015. Common but differentiated governance: A metagovernance approach to make the SDGs work. Sustainability 7: 12295-12321.

Mitchell, T (2006) Society, economy, and the state effect in The anthropology of the state: a reader. Malden, Mass.; Oxford : Blackwell ; pp. 169-186.

Montoya Brand, M., 2005. Servicios públicos domiciliarios y pensamiento ambiental: una aproximación. Letras Jurídicas 10(1): 143-186.

Nietzsche (1994) [1887]. On the Genealogy of Morals: a Polemic. Cambridge University Press.

Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., Holling, C.S., 2006. Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1), article 18.

Ostrom, E. (2013). Más allá de los mercados y los Estados: gobernanza policéntrica de sistemas económicos complejos. Derecho Ambiental(1), 5-72.

Ostrom, E., 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 20: 550-557.

Peters, G. (2007) “Globalización, gobernanza y Estado: algunas proposiciones acerca del proceso de gobernar”. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, No. 39, Oct. 2007, pp. 33-50.

Subirats, J. (2011). Otra sociedad, ¿otra política? Barcelona: Icaria.

Subirats, J., Knoepfel, P., Larue, C., & Varone, F. (2008). Análisis y gestión de políticas públicas. Barcelona: Ariel.

Taylor, N. (1998) Urban planning theory since 1945. London, Sage Publications.

UNHCR, (2017) Asentamientos informales: las ciudades invisibles. [online Access] Available at https://pnudcolombia.exposure.co/habitat-iii (último acceso Marzo 11 de 2018).

Uribe, M.T., Valencia, G., 2005. Tensiones y dilemas en la prestación de los servicios públicos domiciliarios en Colombia: entre lo público, lo privado y lo estatal. Letras Jurídicas 10(1): 31–76.

van Mierlo, B., Beers, P.J. (In Press). Understanding and governing learning in sustainability transitions: a review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. DOI: https://doi.org/10.106/j.eist.2018.08.002.

Witmayer, J.M., van Steenbergen, F., Rok, A., Roorda, C., 2016. Governing sustainability: a dialogue between Local Agenda 21 and transition management. Local Environment 21(8): 939-955.

Wittmayer, J.M., Loorbach, D., 2016. Governing transitions in cities: fostering alternative ideas, practices, and social relations through transition management. In Loorbach, D., Wittmayer, J.M., Shiroyama, H., Fujino, F., Mizuguchi, S. (eds.). Governance of urban sustainability transitions – European and Asian experiences. Tokyo: Springer. pp. 13-32.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.