Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

A partir de una pregunta metodológica – ¿dónde está la política criminal? – el presente artículo revisa la literatura en estudios socio-jurídicos anglosajones con el fin de situar metodológica y analíticamente la política criminal en el marco de investigaciones empíricas. Una revisión no exhaustiva y deliberadamente parcial de estudios clásicos en la tradición denominada “derecho y sociedad” (Law & Society) permite reflexionar respecto al rol específico de las organizaciones encargadas de aplicar el derecho penal, y a la tensión entre perspectivas funcionalistas o estructuralistas, por un lado, y perspectivas pragmatistas y empiricistas, por el otro. Tres pistas de análisis son finalmente propuestas: primero, que la política criminal se encuentra del lado del “derecho en acción”; segundo, que tener acceso a ella requiere tomar distancia respecto de concepciones normativas y funcionalistas del derecho y; tercero, que estudiarla tal y como ésta se despliega en la vida cotidiana de justiciables y operadores jurídicos implica movilizar métodos empíricos que reposen sobre una concepción no idealizada de la vida cotidiana.

Araya Moreno, J. (2021). ¿Dónde está la política criminal? ¿Cómo estudiarla? Derecho penal y vida cotidiana en estudios sociojurídicos anglosajones. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 23(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.9437

Abrego, L. (2011). Legal consciousness of undocumented latinos: Fear and stigma as barriers to claims-making for first- and 1.5-generation immigrants. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 337-370.

Barrett, C. J. (2012). Courting kids: Inside an experimental youth court. nyu Press.

Becker, H. (1991). Outsiders. Studies in the sociology of deviance. The Free Press.

Bell, J. (2004). The police and policing. En A. Sarat (Ed.), The blackwell companion to law and society (pp. 131-145). Blackwell.

Blumberg, A. S. (1967). The practice of law as confidence game: Organizational cooptation of a profession. Law & Society Review, 1(2), 15-40.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). La force du droit. Éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 64, 3-19.

Calavita, K. (2001). Blue jeans, rape, and the ‘de-constitutive’ power of law. Law & Society Review, 35(1), 89-116.

Carson, W. G. (1977). Whigs and hunters: The origins of the black act by E. P. Thompson (Book Review). Contemporary Crisis, 1(2), 225-228.

Castro, María Victoria (2020). Derecho y geografía: espacio, poder y sistema jurídico. Siglo del Hombre Editores. de Certeau, M. (1990). L’ invention du quotidien. Gallimard.

Chambliss, W. J. (1964). A sociological analysis of the law of vagrancy. Social Problems, 12(1), 67-77.

Chua, L. J., & Engel, D. M. (2019). Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 335-353.

Cole, D. H. (2001). ‘An unqualified human good’: E. P. Thompson and the rule of law. Journal of Law and Society, 28(2), 177-203.

Commaille, C., & Lacour, S. (2018). Legal consciousness studies as a laboratory of a renewed system of knowledge about law: Presentation of the special report. Droit et société, 100(3), 559-568.

Cornut St-Pierre, P. (2019). Investigating legal consciousness through the technical work of elite lawyers: A case study on tax avoidance. Law & Society Review, 53(2), 323-352.

Dewey, J. (2012). The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry. Pennsylvania State University Press.

Durkheim, E. (1867/1967). De la division du travail social. puf. (Trabajo original publicado en 1867).

Ewick, P., & Sarat, A. (2015). On the emerging maturity of law and society: An introduction. En P. Ewick, & A. Sarat (Eds.), The handbook of law and society (pp. xiii-xxii). Wiley-Blackwell.

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.

Fassin, D. (2011). La force de l’ordre. Une anthropologie de la police des quartiers. Éditions du Seuil.

Feeley, M. M. (1992). The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. Russell Sage.

Feeley, M. M., & Simon, J. (1994). Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law. En D. Nelken (Ed.), The futures of criminology (pp.

-201). Sage.

Friedman, L. M. (1986). The law and society movement. Stanford Law Review, 38(3), 763-780.

Fuentes, C. (2004). La inevitable ‘mano dura’: Sociedad civil y violencia policial en Argentina y Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política, 24(2), 3-28.

Galanter, M. (1974). Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review, 9(1), 95-160.

García Villegas, M. & Rodríguez, C.A. (2003). Derecho y sociedad en América Latina: Un debate sobre los estudios jurídicos críticos. ilsa.

Garland, D. (1997). ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 173-214.

González Van Cleve, N. (2016). Crook county: Racism and injustice in america’s largest criminal court. Stanford University Press.

Goodale, M. (2017). Anthropology and law. A critical introduction. nyu Press.

Gordon, R. W. (1984). Critical legal histories. Stanford Law Review, 36, 57-125.

Greenhouse, C. J., Yngvesson, B., & Engel, D. M. (2018). Law and community in three American towns. Cornell University Press.

Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. The University of Chicago Press.

Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1982). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state, and law and order. Macmillan Press.

Hoffman, E. A. (2003). Legal Consciousness and Dispute Resolution: Different disputing behavior at two similar taxicab companies. Law & Social Inquiry, 28(3), 691-716.

Johnson, B. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44(2), 259-298.

Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2018). Misdemeanorland: Criminal courts and social control in an age of broken windows policing. Princeton University Press.

Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2019). Malcolm Feeley’s concept of law. En R. Greenspan, H. Aviram, & J. Simon (Eds.), The legal process and the promise of justice: Studies inspired by the work of Malcolm Feeley (pp. 36-54). Cambridge University Press.

Lefebvre, Henri (1958). Critique de la vie quotidienne. L’Arche.

Lempert, R., & Sanders, J. (1986). An invitation to law and social science. Desert, disputes, and distribution. Longman.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russel Sage Foundation.

Liu, S. (2015). Law’s social forms: A powerless approach to the sociology of law. Law & Social Inquiry, 40(1), 1-28.

Macaulay, S. (1963). Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. American Sociological Review, 28(1), 55-67.

Macaulay, S. (1984). Law and the behavioral sciences: Is there any there there? Law & Policy, 6(2), 149-187.

Malinowski, B. (1926/2017). Crime and custom in savage society. Routledge. (Trabajo original publicado en 1926).

Marcus, G. E. (1993). Mass toxic torts and the end of everyday life. En A. Sarat & T. R. Kearns (Eds.), Law in everyday life (pp. 237-274). University of Michigan Press.

Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.

Merry, S. E. (1990). Getting justice and getting even: The legal consciousness of working-class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mezey, N. (2003). Law as culture. In A. Sarat & J. Simon (Eds.), Culture analysis, cultural studies, and the law (pp. 37-72). Duke University Press.

Morales, A. M. (2012). La política criminal contemporánea: Influencia en Chile del discurso de la ley y el orden. Política criminal, 7(13), 94-146.

Ríos, V. M., Carney, N., & Kelekay, J. (2017). Ethnographies of race, crime, and justice: Toward a sociological double-consciousness. The Annual Review of Sociology, 43(13).

Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2011). El derecho en América Latina: Un mapa para el pensamiento jurídico del siglo xxi. Siglo xxi.

Rodríguez-Garavito, C. (2011). Law and Society in Latin America: A new map. Routledge.

Sarat, A. (1990). ‘The law is all over’ power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2(2), 343-379.

Sarat, A. (2004). Vitality amidst fragmentation: On the emergence of post-realist law and society scholarship. En A. Sarat (Ed.), The blackwell companion to law and society (pp. 1-12). Blackwell.

Sarat, A., & Felstiner, W. L. F. (1995). Divorce lawyers and their clients: Power and meaning in the legal process. Oxford University Press.

Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. R. (1993a). Beyond the great divide: Forms of legal scholarship and everyday life. En A. Sarat & T. R. Kearns (Eds.), Law in everyday life (pp. 21-62). University of Michigan Press.

Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. R. (1993b). Law in everyday life. University of Michigan

Press.

Sarat, A., & Silbey, S. (1988). The pull of the policy audience. Law & Policy, 10(3), 97.

Seron, C., & Silbey, S. (2004). Profession, science, and culture: An emergent canon of law and society research. En A. Sarat (Ed.), The blackwell companion to law and society (pp. 30-59). Backwell.

Sieder, R., Ansolabehere, K., & Alfonso, T. (2019), Routledge Handbook of Law and Society in Latin America. Routledge.

Silbey, S. (2005). After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323-368.

Silbey, S. & Cavicchi, A. (2005). The common place of law: Transforming matters of concern into the objects of everyday life. En B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: atmospheres of democracy (pp. 556-565). mit Press.

Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford University Press.

Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763-798.

Stuart, F. (2016). Down, out, and under arrest: Policing and everyday life in skid row. Chicago University Press.

Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12(3), 255-276.

Sutton, J. (2001). Law/society: Origins, interactions, and change. Pine Forge.

Tamanaha, B. (1997). Realistic socio-legal theory: Pragmatism and a social theory of law. Clarendon.

Tamanaha, B. (2001). A general jurisprudence of law and society. Oxford University Press.

Tamanaha, B. (2006). Law as a means to an end: Threat to the rule of law. Cambridge University Press.

Taussig, M. (1996). The injustice of policing: Prehistory and rectitude. En A.

Sarat & T. R. Kearns (Eds.), Justice and injustice in law and legal theory (pp. 19-34). University of Michigan Press.

Thompson, E. P. (1975). Whigs and hunters. The origin of the black act. Allen Lane.

Trubek, D. M. (1984). Where the action is: Critical legal studies and empiricism. Stanford Law Review, 36(1/2), 575-622.

Trubek, D. M. (1990). Back to the future: The short, happy life of the law and society movement. Florida State University Law Review, 18(1), 1-55.

Trubek, D. M., & Esser, J. (1989). “Critical empiricism” in American legal studies: paradox, program, or pandora’s box. Law & Social Enquiry, 14(1), 3-52.

Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137-178.

Valverde, M. (2003). “Which side are you on?” Uses of the everyday in sociolegal scholarship. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 26(1), 86-98.

Valverde, M. (2011). Seeing like a city: The dialectic of modern and premodern ways of seeing in urban governance. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 277-312.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.