Criterios para la construcción de un instrumento de evaluación funcional en pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Descargas
Ariel García Alfonso, Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física y el Deporte Manuel Fajardo, La Habana (Cuba).
Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física y el Deporte Manuel Fajardo, La Habana (Cuba).Héctor Navarro Guerra, Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física y el Deporte Manuel Fajardo, La Habana (Cuba).
Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física y el Deporte Manuel Fajardo, La Habana (Cuba).Carlos Arencibia Abreus, Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física y el Deporte Manuel Fajardo, La Habana (Cuba).
Universidad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física y el Deporte Manuel Fajardo, La Habana (Cuba).Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics. 2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e67-492. Doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558
Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741-54. Doi: 10.1016/S474-4422(09)70150-4
Hennerici MG, Kern R, Szabo K, Binder J. Stroke. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Seitz RJ, Donnan GA. Stroke: pathophysiology, recovery potential, and timelines for recovery and rehabilitation. In: Carey LM, editor. Stroke rehabilitation: insights from neuroscience and imaging. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
English C, Bowen A, Hébert D, Bernhardt J. Rehabilitation after stroke: evidence, practice, and new directions. In: Hankey GJ, Macleod M, Gorelick PB, Chen C, Caprio FZ, Mattle H, editors. Warlow’s Stroke: practical management. 4th ed. Hoboken, nj: Wiley-Blackwell; 20p. 867-77.
Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:313-9. Doi: 10.1177/1545968308328727
Wolf SL, Winstein CJ. Intensive physical therapeutic approaches to stroke recovery. In: Cramer SC, Nudo RJ, editors. Brain repair after stroke. New York: Cambridge University Press; 20p. 219-31.
World Health Organization. World health statistics 20who Library Cataloguing-inPublication Data; 2014.
Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics. 2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146-603. Doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485
Lyden PD, Hantson L. Assessment scales for the evaluation of stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998;7:113-27.
DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2017.
Harrison JK, McArthur KS, Quinn TJ. Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2013;8:201-11 Doi: 10.2147/CIA.S32405
Baker K, Cano SJ, Playford ED. Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy. Stroke. 2011;42:1787-94.
Lees KR, Bath PMW, Schellinger PD, Kerr DM, Fulton R, Hacke W, et al. Contemporary outcome measures in acute stroke research: choice of primary outcome measure. Stroke. 2012;43:1163-70. Doi: 10.1/STROKEAHA.111.641423
Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, Nichols D, Rose DK, Yoshida R, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association Neurology Section Task Force. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1383-96. Doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120492
Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy. Clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke. Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy, V-12/2014; 2014.
Hantson L, Keyser JD. Neurological scales in the assessment of cerebral infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:7-14. Doi: 10.1159/000108532
Hantson L, Weerdt WD, Keyser JD, Diener HC, Franke C, Palm R, et al. The European Stroke Scale. Stroke. 1994;25:2215-9. Doi: 10.1161/01.STR.25.11.2215
Haan RD, Horn J, Limburg M, Meulen JVD, Bossuyt P. A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke. 1993;24:1178-81.
Huang VS, Krakauer JW. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:5. Doi: 10.1186/743-0003-6-5
Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Schaefer SY, Birkenmeier RL. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity following stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:104-15. Doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.06.005
Ashford S, Slade M, Malaprade F, Turner-Stokes L. Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:787-95.
Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12(11):CD010820. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2
Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, Van Wegen EEH, Ket JCF, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2011;42:1482-8. Doi: 10.161/STROKEAHA.110.604090
Prieto G, Delgado AR. Fiabilidad y validez. Papeles del Psicólogo. 2010;31:67-74.
Shultz KS, Whitney DJ, Zickar MJ. Measurement theory in action: case studies and exercises. New York: Routledge; 2014.
Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635-9.
Van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale en chronic stroke patients. J Rehab Med. 2001;33:110-3.
Platz T, Pinkowski C. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:404-11. Doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:962-6.
Quinn T, Dawson J, Walters M, Lees K. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke. 2009;3:200-5.
Sangha H, Lipson D, Foley N, Salter K, Bhogal S, Pohani G, et al. A comparison of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure as outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: patterns of disability scale usage in clinical trials. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28:135-9.
Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011;42:1146-51. Doi: 10.61/STROKEAHA.110.598540
Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. The five item Barthel index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:225-30.
Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer S. A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:78-90. Doi: 10.1177/1545968307305353
Chen HF, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chen CL. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(6):1039-45.
Nomikos PA, Spence N, Alshehri MA. Test-retest reliability of physiotherapists using the action research arm test in chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018;30(10):1271-7. Doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.1271
Grattan ES, Velozo CA, Skidmore ER, Page SJ, Woodbury ML. Interpreting Action Research Arm Test assessment scores to plan treatment. otjr (Thorofare N J). 2019;39(1):64-73. Doi: 10.1177/1539449218757740
Murphy MA, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. bmc Neurol. 2015;15:29. Doi: 10.1186/s12883015-0292-6
Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, English C, Ali M, Churilov L, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:451-61. Doi: 10.1177/1747493017711813
Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98-169. Doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, Sharma AK, Smith TL, Watkins CL. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and Modified Ashworth Scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1013-6.
Millar JD, Wijck FV, Pollock A, Ali M. Outcome measures in post-stroke arm rehabilitation trials: do existing measures capture outcomes that are important to stroke survivors, carers, and clinicians? Clinical Rehabilitation. 2019;33(4):737-49. Doi: 10.1177/0269215518823248
Santisteban L, Térémetz M, Bleton J-P, Baron J-C, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS one. 2016;11(5):e0154792. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone
Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Hewer RL. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;19:25-30.
Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Hemiplegic gait after stroke: is measurement of maximum speed required? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:358-63. Doi: 10.1016/j. apmr.2005.11.007
Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:103-8. Doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.11.0171
Fulk GD, Echternach JL, Nof L, O’Sullivan S. Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24:195-204. Doi: 10.1080/09593980701588284
Liu J, Drutz C, Kumar R, McVicar L, Weinberger R, Brooks D, et al. Use of the six-minute walk test post stroke: is there a practice effect? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1686-92. Doi: 10.016/j.apmr.2008.02.026
Van Bloemendaal M, Van de Water ATM, Van de Port IGL. Walking tests for stroke survivors: a systematic review of their measurement properties. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:220721. Doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.680649
Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33:96103. Doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181a33638
See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al. A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(8):732-41. Doi: 10.1177/1545968313491000
Detalles del artículo
Los manuscritos postulados a la Revista Ciencias de la Salud deben ser originales e inéditos y no deben estar simultáneamente en proceso de publicación en otras revistas, compilaciones o cualquier otro medio de publicación. Los derechos de autor serán de la Universidad del Rosario. Cuando el autor quiera publicar el manuscrito en otra publicación, deberá pedir a la Editorial de la Universidad del Rosario los permisos correspondientes. De igual forma, cuando la Revista Ciencias de la Salud esté interesada en publicar artículos que ya han sido publicados en otras revistas, procederá a solicitar los permisos correspondientes en la editorial donde se realizó la primera publicación.
Bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License los autores pueden compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.