Main Article Content

Authors

Introduction: This research was carried out at the Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, División Multidisciplinaria Ciudad Universitaria, with a sample of students of the Industrial and Systems Engineering Program. With the objective of creating a database containing information about the ranges of motion (ROMS) of the upper limb. Materials and Methods: Upper limb ROMS estimation was developed using a bubble inclinometer Baseline® and the Rosscraft® anthropometric kit. The design of the research was descriptive, quantitative and transversal. A sample of 50 students was taken; the determination of the ROMS consisted in measuring each of the participants and, subsequently, the data were captured and analyzed through Minitab17® software, in order to obtain measures of central tendency and the existence of a significant difference between the ROMS of men and women. Results: The Range of motion limit for the elbow, shoulder, wrist and forearm joints was determined, finding that there is no evidence of significant difference between ROMS of men and women in the study, with the exception of abduction in the right shoulder. Discussion: The data collected in this research can be used to design workspaces that fit the needs of the user, with the aim to avoid the presence of musculoskeletal injuries and reduce physical fatigue among workers.
Peña Ayala L. E., Gómez Bull K. G., Vargas Salgado, M. M., Ibarra Mejía G., & Máynez Guaderrama A. I. (2018). Determination of Range of Motion for Upper Limbs in a Sample of Mexican University Students. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 16(Especial), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6845

Balderrama C, Ariza S, Gaytán G, Soto L, Lom J, Moreno L, Martínez A. Ergonomía en el diseño grá co e industrial. Juarez, Chihuahua: Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez; 2011.

Gutiérrez Henríquez M. Ergonomía e investigación en el sector salud. Cienc. enferm. [Internet]. 2014 dic [citado 2017 sep 19]; 20(3): 7-10. Disponible en: http://www.scielo. cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S071795532014000300001&lng=es. http://dx.doi. org/10.4067/S0717-95532014000300001

Bascuas J, Hueso R. Ergonomía: 20 preguntas básicas para aplicar la ergonomía en la empresa. 2nd ed. Madrid: Constitución y leyes, S. A; 2012.

Fernández JE, Marley R, Noriega S, Ibarra G. Ergonomía ocupacional, diseño y admini- tración del trabajo. México: International Journal of industrial Engineering; 2008.

Ibarra G, Fernández J, Ware B, Mital A, Marley R, Reyes S, Range of Motion of the Upper Extremity and Spine Joints En Mexican Adulds: A Pilot Study. International Conference on Industrial Engineering. 2010, oct 17. Mexico. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Industrial Engineering-Theory, Application and Practice, Mexico; 2010. p. 519-23.

Hussain A, Case K, Marshall R, Summerskill S. Join mobility and inclusive challenges. IJIE. 2016; (53): 67-79.

Norkin C, White J. Measurement of Joint Motion. A guide to goniometry. Philadelphia: Davis Company; 2016.

Yue W, Liu X, Zhu X, Zhou R, Cui C, Li J. Postoperativethree-Dimensional Cervical Range of Motion and Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Cervical Ossi cation of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Cervical Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy with Fusion. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurgry. 2015; (134): p. 17-23.

Tognetti A, Carbonaro N, de Rossi D, Lurossi F. Wearable Goniometer and Accelerometer Sensory Fusion for Knee Joint Angle Measurement in Daily Life. Sensors. 2015 nov 11; 15(11), p. 28435-455; doi:10.3390/s151128435.

Godoy-Cumillaf A, Valdés-Badilla P, García A, Grandón M, Lagos Del Canto L, Aravena R, Herrera-Valenzuela T, Bruneau J, Durán S. Somatotipo y rangos de movilidad articular de cadera y rodilla en estudiantes universitarios. Nutr Hosp. 2015; (32), 2903-9 Disponible en:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309243321073

Lee SH, Yoon C, Chung SG, Kim HC, Kwak Y, Park H-w, et al. Measurement of Shoulder Range of Motion in Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis Using a Kinect. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(6). Doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129398

Pheasant S. Bodyspace, Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc; 2013.

Organizacion Mundial de la Salud. Obesidad y Sobrepeso [sitio virtual]; 2016 oct. Centro de prensa [citado 2016 oct 10]; [1 pantalla]. Disponible en http://www.who.int/media- centre/factsheets/fs311/es/

Garcia-Luna J. La ergonomía en la construcción de la salud de los trabajadores en Colombia. Rev Cienc Salud. 2014; 12, p. 77-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revsalud12. esp.2014.08

Hernández P. Principales brechas de la Ergonomía en América Latina: a quince años del siglo XXI. Rev Cienc Salud. 2016; 14, p. 5-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revistas. urosario.edu.co/revsalud/vol14num02016

Rodríguez Y, Pérez E. Ergonomía y Simulación Aplicadas a la Industria. Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal [Redalyc]. 2011; 32, 2-11.

Díaz J, Vásquez N, Dolores M, Rojas M. Trabajo, Ergonomía y calidad de vida. Una apro- ximación conceptual e intregración. Salud de los trabajadores. 2007; 51-58.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.