Relationship Between Cranial Base Angle and Skeletal Classes in an Adult Population of Paraguay

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.8767

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Published: Mar 9, 2020
Issue: Vol. 18 No. 1 (2020): Ciencias de la Salud
Section Clinical or Experimental Research


Keywords: Orthodontics , skull base diagnostic imaging , cephalometry , Paraguay. ortodoncia , base del cráneo , diagnóstico por imagen , cefalometría , Paraguay. ortodontia , base do Crâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , cefalometria , Paraguai.

Main Article Content

Authors

Cristell Amarilla Posgrado en Ortodoncia Correctiva, Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Superiores.
Clara Maldonado Renault Posgrado en Ortodoncia Correctiva, Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Superiores.
Leticia Galeano Posgrado en Ortodoncia Correctiva, Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Superiores.
Julio Pratt Giosa Dirección de Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Asunción.
Clarisse Díaz-Reissner Dirección de Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Asunción.
Abstract
Introduction: Many studies mention that variations in growth and orientation of the cranial base angle can alter the position of both jaws in relation to the cranial base. This study seeks to relate the cranial base angle according to skeletal classes in adult patients who attended the Dental Clinic of the Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Superiores in Asunción city in Paraguay, between 2010 and 2018, using lateral cephalometric radiographs. Materials and methods: The article presents a retrospective cross-sectional study. Skeletal classes were classified using the ANB angle and the NSBa angle of Varjanne and Koski to determine the cranial base angle. Chi-square tests were applied to associate the cranial base angle according to skeletal classes, with a confidence level of 95 %. Results: In this study, 185 lateral cephalometric radiographs were included in the study of people who attended the clinic. The mean values of NSBa angle were 128.84° ±5.17° for all classes; 128.27° ± 5.27° for class I, 129.1° ± 4.7° for class II and 127.84° ± 5° for class III. The 65.95 % of participants had NSBa angle values out of the norm, from which 87.7 % reported a small cranial base angle. Conclusion: The average cranial base angle was found to be out of the norm in every skeletal class in decreasing order for classes III, I, and II, cranial flexure being more frequent than others.
How to Cite
Amarilla, C., Maldonado Renault, C., Galeano, L., Pratt Giosa, J., & Díaz-Reissner, C. (2020). Relationship Between Cranial Base Angle and Skeletal Classes in an Adult Population of Paraguay. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 18(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.8767
References

Toledo Jaramillo DT, Cazar Almache M, Bravo Calderón M. Correlación de la base del cráneo con el patrón facial y la posición sagital de los maxilares. Rev Odonlog Lat Ortod y Odontoped. 2014;48(3):1-18.

Sato, S. The masticatory organ: functions and dysfunctions. En: Slavicek R, editor. The dynamic functional anatomy of the craniofacial complex its and relation to the articulations of dentition. Edición única. Klosterneuburg, Austria: GAMMA Medizinisch-Wissenschaftliche Fortbildung-AG; 2002. p. 484-90.

Cendekiawan T, Wong RWK, Rabie ABM. Relationships between cranial base synchondroses and craniofacial development: A review. Open Anat J. 2010;2(1):67-75. Doi: 10.2174/1877609401002010067

Arat M, Köklü A, Ozdiler E, Rübendüz M, Erdoğan B. Craniofacial growth and skeletal maturation: a mixed longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(4):355-361.

Arat ZM, Rübendüz M, Akgül AA. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(4):374-380. Doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0374:TDOCRL>2.0.CO;2

Shah R, Mushtaq M, Mahmood A. The relationship between cranial base angle and various malocclusion types. Pak Orthod J. 2015;7(1):8-12.

Fathi H, Mohammad-Rabei E, Kabiri S, Baghban AA, Soheilifar S, Nouri M. Craniofacial and airway growth in 9-11 years old normal dental occlusion in Iranian adolescents: A longitudinal cephalometric study. Dent Hypotheses. 2018;8(1):8-16. Doi: 10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_55_16

Gregoret J. Ortodoncia y cirugía ortognática: diagnóstico y planificación. 2da. Ed. Caracas: amolca; 2014.

Dias de Almeida Berger OP, Menezes Marchioro E, Deon Rizzato SM, Martinelli Santayana de Lima E. Comparative study of linear and angular measures of the cranial base in skeletal Class I and III malocclusion. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2011;26(2):126-132. Doi: 10.1590/S1980-65232011000200006

Dhopatkar A, Bhatia S, Rock P. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(5):456-463. Doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0456:AIITRB>2.0.CO;2

Flores Angeles A, Soldevilla Galarza L. Evaluación de la deflexión de la base del cráneo. Un estudio cefalométrico. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2017;20(1):23-26. Doi: 10.15381/os.v20i1.13546

Abd BI, Ali FA. Cranial base morphology in different skeletal classes (A cross-sectional lateral cephalometric study). J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2013;25(Special Is 1):108-113.

Almeida KCM, Raveli TB, Vieira CIV, et al. Influence of the cranial base flexion on Class I, II and III malocclusions: a systematic review. Dent Press J Orthod. 2017;22(5):56-66. Doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.056-066.oar

Andria LM, Leite LP, Prevatte TM, King LB. Correlation of the cranial base angle and its components with other dental/skeletal variables and treatment time. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(3):361-366. Doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0361:COTCBA>2.0.CO;2

Vandekar M, Kulkarni P, Vaid N. Role of cranial base morphology in determining skeletal anteroposterior relationship of the jaws. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2013;47(5):245-248. Doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1167

Proff P, Will F, Bokan I, Fanghänel J, Gedrange T. Cranial base features in skeletal class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(3):433-439. Doi: 10.2319/013007-48.1

Agarwal A, Pandey H, Bajaj K, Pandey L. Changes in cranial base morphology in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(1):39-42.

Barrachina Mataix C. Cefalometría. En: Canut Brusola JA, editor. Ortodoncia clínica y terapeútica. 2da. Ed. Barcelona: Masson; 2005:174-202.

Ruiz Rivera AJ, Canseco Jiménez J, Cuairán Ruidíaz V. Relación entre la deflexión de la base del cráneo y la clase ósea. Rev Odont Mex. 2011;15(4):214-218.

Agrawal M, Mehta F, Mehta S. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion in gujarati population. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2014;4(1):324-348.

Polat Ö, Kaya B. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007;10(4):216-221. Doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00403.x

Kasai K, Moro T, Kanazawa E, Iwasawa T. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17(5):403-410. Doi: 10.1093/ejo/17.5.403

Panainte I, Suciu V, Mártha K-I. Original research. Correlation between cranial base morphology and various types of skeletal anomalies. J Interdiscip Med. 2017;2(S1):57-61. Doi: 10.1515/jim-2017-0007

Chin A, Perry S, Liao C, Yang Y. The relationship between the cranial base and jaw base in a Chinese population. Head Face Med. 2014;10(1):31. Doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-10-31

Bacon W, Eiller V, Hildwein M, Dubois G. The cranial base in subjects with dental and skeletal Class II. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14(3):224-228. Doi:10.1093/ejo/14.3.224

Alves PV, Mazuchelli J, Patel PK, Bolognese AM. Cranial base angulation in Brazilian patients seeking orthodontic treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(2):334-338. Doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181539b70

Qadir M. To evaluate the association between cranial base angle and malocclusions in sagittal plane. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. 2017;3(5):496-500.

Gong A, Li J, Wang Z, et al. Cranial base characteristics in anteroposterior malocclusions: A meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(4):668-680. Doi: 10.2319/032315-186.1

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Publcation metrics

589 106




 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Published articles are solely the authors’ responsibility and do not commit the Editorial Committee nor the Scientific Committee. The copyrights belong to the Revista Ciencias de la Salud, therefore, total or partial reproduction of the published material is forbidden, unless there is a previous authorization.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.