Acuerdos y desacuerdos entre los jefes y los subordinados sobre la admiración del liderazgo

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.10845

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF HTML Lector Inteligente ePub Vídeo

Publicado: ene. 13, 2022
Número: Vol. 24 Núm. 42 (2022)
Sección Artículo de investigación científica y tecnológica


Palabras clave: liderazgo relación jefe-líder relación líder-seguidores relación jefesubordinado habilidades directivas liderazgo transformacional confianza apoyo auto eficacia

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

Luis Felipe Llanos Reynoso
Universidad Anáhuac
Marcelo José Villarreal Coindreau
Universidad Anáhuac

Resumen

La opinión de los seguidores está tomando una mayor relevancia en la gestión del liderazgo de las organizaciones. Por ello, se buscó contrastar la percepción de los subordinados sobre si admiran a su jefe como líder, contra la opinión que tiene el propio jefe al respecto. En la muestra participaron 442 personas, 221 parejas de jefes y subordinados, de 63 empresas en México, que opinaron sobre acciones de los jefes y su liderazgo. Los resultados confirman que los subordinados tienden a admirar a sus jefes como líderes, solo si estos últimos apoyan su trabajo y confían en sus capacidades. Sin embargo, algunas opiniones de los jefes sobre su propio liderazgo, no guardan relación con lo que opinan sus subordinados. Estos hallazgos destacan la importancia de que los jefes pregunten a sus subordinados lo que opinan para que puedan fortalecer su liderazgo.

Biografía del autor/a

Luis Felipe Llanos Reynoso, Universidad Anáhuac

Doctor, Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Anáhuac, México.

Marcelo José Villarreal Coindreau, Universidad Anáhuac

Doctor, Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Anáhuac, México.

Cómo citar
Llanos Reynoso, L. F., & Villarreal Coindreau, M. J. (2022). Acuerdos y desacuerdos entre los jefes y los subordinados sobre la admiración del liderazgo. Revista Universidad Y Empresa, 24(42), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.10845
Referencias bibliográfica

Acosta, J. C., Zárate, R. A., & Garzón, M. A. (2015, julio-diciembre). Relación entre el liderazgo transformacional y la esperanza. Estudio de 100 líderes empresariales chilenos. Revista Científica “Visión de Futuro”, 19(2). 38-58. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3579/357941099002.pdf

Alpaca, Y. E., & Ayala, M. (2021). Impacto del estilo de liderazgo transformacional en el índice de innovación de las empresas (Tesis de grado). Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima. https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/handle/10757/653046

Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1997). Self-other agreement: a review and model. En G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (Vol. 16, pp. 121-174). JAI Press. Avery, G. C. (2011). Understanding leadership (3.a ed.). Sage Publications.

Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.). (2013). Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead 10th anniversary edition. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Avolio, B. J., Bass, B., & Jung, D. I. (2010). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789

Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621

Baker, C. R., & Omilion-Hodges, L. M. (2013). The effect of leader-member exchange differentiation within work units on coworker exchange and organizational citizenship behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 30(4), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2013.837387

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bass, B. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410

Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership

for individual, team, and organizational development. En R. W. Woodman, & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development (Vol. 4, pp. 231-272). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Bass, B., Avolio, B. J., & Atwater, L. E. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership

of men and women. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1996.tb00847.x

Bass, B., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting Unit Performance by Assessing Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207

Carmona, J. A. (2018). Relación entre el intercambio líder-miembro e intención de rotación (estudio de caso: sector académico) (Tesis de grado). Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, Caracas.

Castro, A., & Lupano, M. L. (2007). Teorías implícitas del liderazgo y calidad de la relación entre líder y seguidor. Boletín de Psicología, (89), 7-28.

Cetina, T., Ortega, I., & Aguilar, C. (2010). Habilidades directivas desde la percepción de los subordinados: un enfoque relacional para el estudio del liderazgo. Psicoperspectivas, 9(1), 124-137. https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol9-Issue1-fulltext-94

Chiu, C. -Y. C., Balkundi, P., & Weinberg, F.J. (2017, April). When managers become leaders: The

role of manager network centralities, social power, and followers’ perception of leadership.

The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 334-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.004

Crouch, A., & Yetton, P. (1988). Manager-subordinate dyads: Relationships among task and social contact, manager friendliness and subordinate performance in management groups.

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90047-7

Dansereau, F., Alutto, J., & Yammarino, F. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The Varient approach. Prentice Hall.

Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership

within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7

Day, D. V., & Schyns, B. (2010). The importance of agreement and consensus in leadership research: Introduction to the Special Issue. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(3), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903448766

Den Hartog, D. N., Van Muijen, J. J., & Koopman, P. L. (2011). Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00628.x

Dippel, M., & Toledo, M. F. (2004). Efecto del liderazgo intercambio – Líder miembro de la organización. (Tesis de grado). Facultad de ciencias económicas y administrativas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia.

Ertürk, A., Van der Broeck, H., & Verbrigghe, J. (2018). Self-other agreement on transformational leadership and subordinates’ assessment of supervisor’s performance: Mediating role of leader-member exchange. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(2), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2016-0048

Fairhurst, G. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60(4), 321-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376316

Feinberg, B., Ostroff, C., & Burke, W. W. (2011). The role of within-group agreement in understanding transformational leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational

Psychology, 78(3), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26156

Felfe, J., & Heinitz, K. (2008). The impact of followers’ and leaders’ personality and perceived

similarity on followers’ perceptions of transformational leadership and leader acceptance. En J. Deller (Ed.), Personality and Work (pp. 197-217). Rainer Hampp Verlag.

Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2006). Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Personal Need for Structure, and Occupational Self-Efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 708-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00026.x

Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2010). Followers’ personality and the perception of transformational leadership: Further evidence for the similarity hypothesis. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 393-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00649.x

Felfe, J., y Heinitz, K. (2010). The impact of consensus and agreement of leadership perceptions on commitment, organizational citizenship behaviour, and customer satisfaction.

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(3), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320802708070

Fierro, I., & Villalva, M. (2017, abril). El liderazgo Democrático: Una Aproximación Conceptual. innova Research Journal, 2(4), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v2.n4.2017.210

Galliani, E. M., & Vianello, M. (2012). The emotion of admiration improves employees’ goal orientations and contextual performance. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 2(4), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20120204.02

Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. En M. Dunnette (Ed.),

Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Rand McNally

& Co.

Graen, G., & Schiemann, W. (1978). Leader-member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(2), 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-

63.2.206

Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development

of Leader-Member Exchange (lmx) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-

Level Multi-Domain Perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(82)90236-7

Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 21(1), 100-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108

Hofstede, G. (2015). National differences in communication styles. En D. Brzozowska, & W. Chlopicki (Eds.), Culture’s software. Communication styles (pp. 1-14). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

House, R. J. (1996). Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Lessons, Legacy, and a Reformulated Theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-843(96)90024-7

House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1975). Path-goal theory of leadership [Technical Report]. National Technical Information Service, ntis, U. S. Department of Commerce; University of Washington. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA009513.pdf

House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project globe. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4

Kenney, R. A., Blascovich, J., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: prototypes for new leaders. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15(4), 409-437. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1504_2

Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1128-1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962211004

Kim, B. P., Poulston, J., & Sankaran, A. C. (2017). An examination of leader-member exchange

(LMX) agreement between employees and their supervisors and its influence on work outcomes. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 26(3), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2017.1228094

Li, B., & Ye, M. (2015). Relative leader-member exchange: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(6), 911-916. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2015.86092

Loaiza, C. T. (2021). Relación entre el género y el intercambio líder-miembro en el techo de cristal en empresas privadas de Bogotá d. c. (Tesis de grado, Facultad de psicología). Universidad Católica de Colombia. Bogotá. https://hdl.handle.net/10983/25910

Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership perceptions and behavioral measurement on organizational settings. En B. M. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 87-128). JAI Press.

Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions

and performance. Unwin Hyman.

Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., & DeVader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), 343-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6

Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585-600. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306232

Martin, R., Thomas, G., Legood, A., & Dello Russo, S. (2018). Leader-member exchange (lmx) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2202

Mayoral, L., Rezrazi, A., & Gangloff, B. (2018). Si quiere que su jefe lo aprecie ¡Sonriale! Ciencias Administrativas, (15), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e052

Michaelis, B. (2009). Transformational and charismatic leadership effects on performance outcomes. An analysis of linking mechanisms and boundary conditions (Tesis de grado). Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg.

Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Ilies, R. (2009). The development of leader–member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 256-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.002

Polston-Murdoch, L. (2013). An Investigation of Path-Goal Theory, Relationship of Leadership Style, Supervisor-Related Commitment, and Gender. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 6(1), 13- 44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270103671_An_Investigation_of_Path-

Goal_Theory_Relationship_of_Leadership_Style_Supervisor-_Related_Commitment_and_Gender

Regts, G., Molleman, E., & Van de Brake, H. J. (2018). The impact of leader-member exchange

on follower performance in light of the larger social network. Human Relations, 72(8), 1265-1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718806351

Saballos, T., Rugama, E., & Alemán, K. V. (2017). Gestión del talento humano: El liderazgo empresarial en el éxito de la organización (Tesis de grado). Universidad Nacional Autónoma

de Nicaragua, Managua. http://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/id/eprint/8726

Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428

Schyns, B., & Day, D. V. (2010). Critique and review of leader-member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903024922

Shatzer, R. H. (2009). Predicting transformational leadership: Self-other agreement in multisource feedback (Tesis de grado). Brigham Young University. Provo.

Sin, H.-P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). Understanding Why They Don’t See Eye to Eye: An Examination of Leader–Member Exchange (lmx) Agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1048-1057. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014827

Snyder, R. A., & Bruning, N. S. (1985). Quality of vertical dyad linkages: Congruence of supervisor and subordinate competence and role stress as explanatory variables. Group and Organization Studies, 10(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118501000105

Sosik, J. J., & Megerian, L. E. (1999). Understanding leader emotional intelligence and performance. The role of self-other agreement on transformational leadership perceptions. Group & Organization Management, 24(3), 367-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199243006

Tekleab, A. G., Sims, H. P., Yun, S., Tesluk, P. E., & Cox, J. (2008). Are we on the same page? Effects of self-awareness of empowering and transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(3), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071791907311069

Tsai, C. Y., Dionne, S. D., Wang, A. C., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F.J., & Cheng, B. S. (2017). Effects of relational schema congruence on leader-member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2), 268-284.

Van Gils, S., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2010). The X-factor: On the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(3), 333-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320902978458

Varela, O. E., Cater, J. J., & Michel, N. (2011). Similarity attraction in learning contexts: An empirical study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20066

Villarreal, M. J., & Llanos, L. F. (2019). Confianza, autoeficacia y percepción de liderazgo. Dimensión Empresarial, 17(3), 19-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.15665/dem.v17i3.1641

Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5.a ed.). Prentice Hall.

Zárate, R., & Matviuk, S. (2012, enero-junio). Inteligencia emocional y prácticas de liderazgo en las organizaciones colombianas. Cuadernos de administración, 28(47), 89-102. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/cuadm/v28n47/v28n47a08.pdf

Estadísticas de consulta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Métricas de publicación

1625 1237




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.