Main Article Content

Authors

Attention has been defined as a multidimensional construct, dealing with regulation of which stimuli the perceptual resources are directed to, filtering irrelevant information out to favor the retention of relevant information for a period of time, before acting on it. The computerized evaluation of attention has been gaining relevance both in research and in professional practice. The objectives are: 1) to analyze internal consistency and concurrent validity of the Child Attention Test 6.0 (tai), computerized version 6.0; and, 2) to obtain the preliminary reference values for each of the tai subtests done. The data for the validity and reliability studies of the tai corresponds to a sample of 122 schoolchildren in Mendoza (Argentina). When analyzing the internal consistency, satisfactory values were obtained for each subtest (Test 1, kr 20 = 0.78; Test 2, kr 20 = 0.74; and Test 3, kr 20 = 0.73). Satisfactory values were obtained when exploring the stability of the instrument. For concurrent validity, the results indicate significant moderate positive correlations (<0.01) between the scores obtained in the Caras-R test and subtests 1 and 2 of the tai, used to evaluate attentional performance. Significant positive associations (<0.01) were observed between tai subtest 3 and the Corsi Block Test, used to assess visuospatial working memory. These results indicate that the tai, an instrument developed in order to evaluate attention and visuospatial working memory of school children, presents adequate indicators of validity and reliability. The findings, limitations, and future lines of research are discussed.

MIRTA SUSANA ISON, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas y Universidad del Aconcagua

PhD in Psychology, and Master’s in Clinical Psychology of Comprehensive Cognitive-Behavioral Orientation - National University of San Luis. Bachelor’s Degree in Psychology- Aconcagua University, Mendoza. Currently, Principal Investigator of National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). Director of Doctoral Studies in Psychology – Aconcagua University, and Director of the Research Institute of the Faculty of Psychology – Aconcagua University. Full member of the Argentine Association of Behavioral Sciences, member of the Interamerican Society of Psychology, member of the American Psychological Association and member of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS).

María Jimena Arroyo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas y Universidad del Aconcagua

Phd student at the Aconcagua University. Doctoral fellowship by the CONICET for the project "Children with frontal epilepsy or rolandic epilepsy: evaluation of executive functions and the effect of antiepileptic drugs". Workplace: Psychology of Child and Adolescent Development Group, Institute of Human, Social and Environmental Sciences (INCIHUSA). National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET).

María Gabriela Caligiore Gei, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas y Universidad del Aconcagua

Phd student at the Aconcagua University. Doctoral fellowship by the CONICET for the project "Children's self-efficacy perception and executive control in school children: the influence of parental involvement in education". Workplace: Psychology of Child and Adolescent Development Group, Institute of Human, Social and Environmental Sciences (INCIHUSA). National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET).

ISON, M. S., Arroyo, M. J., & Caligiore Gei, M. G. (2023). Test of Child Attention (TAI): Analysis of the psychometric characteristics and preliminary reference values. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 41(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.11903

Aguilar, D. R., Jústiz-Guerra, M., & Martínez-González, L. G. (2019). Software educativo para estimular procesos cognitivos en escolares con funcionamiento intelectual limítrofe. Delectus, 2(2), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.36996/delectus.v2i2.28

American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf

Amso, D., & Scerif, G. (2015). The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(10), 606-619. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn4025.

Anselmi, P., Colledani, D., & Robusto, E. (2019). A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714

Arce, T., & McMullen, K. (2021). The Corsi Block-Tapping Test: evaluating methodological practices with an eye towards modern digital frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100099 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100099

Ariës, R. J., Ghysels, J., Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2016). Combined working memory capacity and reasoning strategy training improve reasoning skills in secondary social studies education: evidence from an experimental study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 233-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.008

Astle, D. E., & Scerif, G. (2011). Interactions between attention and visual short-term memory (VSTM): what can be learned from individual and developmental differences? Neuropsychologia, 49, 1435-1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.001

Aydmune, Y, Introzzi, I., Comesaña, A., & Lipina, S. (2021). Inhibición de la respuesta: entrenamiento y efectos vinculados al nivel inhibitorio de base en niños. Revista CES Psicología, 14(2), 140-163. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.5383

Aydmune, Y., Introzzi, I., Vernucci, S., & Zamora, E. (2022). Development of inhibitory processes during the first years of primary schooling. Psychology & Neuroscience, 15(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000278

Aydmune, Y., Lipina, S., & Introzzi, I. (2017). Definiciones y métodos de entrenamiento de la inhibición en la niñez, desde una perspectiva neuropsicológica. Una revisión sistemática. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 9(3), 104-141.

Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory: the interface between memory and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(3), 281-288.

Bajpai, S., & Bajpai, R. (2014). Goodness of measurement: reliability and validity. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 3(2), 112-115. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2013.191120133

Berch, D. B., Krikorian, R., & Huha, E. M. (1998). The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: methodological and theoretical considerations. Brain and Cognition, 38(3), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1998.1039

Boen, R., Ferschmann, L., Vijayakumar, N., Overbye, K., Fjell, A. M., Espeseth, T., & Tamnes, C. K. (2021). Development of attention networks from childhood to young adulthood: a study of performance, intraindividual variability and cortical thickness. Cortex, 138, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.018

Brandes-Aitken, A., Braren, S., Swingler, M., Voegtline, K., & Blair, C. (2019). Sustained attention in infancy: a foundation for the development of multiple aspects of self-regulation for children in poverty. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 184, 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.006

Brennan, A. A., Bruderer, A. J., Liu-Ambrose, T., & Handy, T. C. (2017). Lifespan changes in attention revisited: everyday visual search. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 160-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cep0000130

Burga León, A. (2019). Aplicaciones de la tecnología a la evaluación psicométrica. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(SPE), e318. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7nSPE.318

Canet-Juric, L., Stelzer, F., Andrés, M. L., Vernucci, S., Introzzi, I., & Burin, D. L. (2018). Evidencias de validez de una tarea computarizada de memoria de trabajo verbal y visoespacial para niños. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 52(1), 112-128.

Canet-Juric, L., Del Valle, M. V., Gelpi-Trudo, R., García-Coni, A., Zamora, E. V., Introzzi, I., & Andrés, M. L. (2021). Desarrollo y validación del Cuestionario de Funciones Ejecutivas en niños de 9 a 12 años (Cufe). Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 39(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.9892

Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: the past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012

Corsi, P. M. (1973). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34(2), 891.

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Espósito, A. (2017). Estimulación cognitiva en escolares mendocinos: modalidades de intervención [tesis doctoral]. Universidad Nacional de San Luis.

Evans, K. K. (2020). The role of selective attention in cross-modal interactions between auditory and visual features. Cognition, 196, 104119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104119

Fernández, A. L. (2014). Neuropsicología de la atención. Conceptos, alteraciones y evaluación. Revista Argentina de Neuropsicología, 25, 1-28.

Fernández-Alcántara, M., Albaladejo-Blázquez, N., Fernández-Ávalos, M. I., Sánchez-San Segundo, M., Cruz-Quintana, F., Pérez-Martínez, V., Carrasco-Sánchez, C., & Pérez-Marfil, M. N. (2022). Validity of the Computerized Battery for Neuropsychological Evaluation of Children (Benci) in Spanish children: preliminary results. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 22, 893-903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12080065

Fernández-Martínez, E., Fernández-Castro, Y., & Crespo-Moinelo, M. C. (2020). Integración de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en la intervención neuropsicológica. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 31(3), e1592.

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133, 101-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics 21 step by step: a simple guide and reference (13th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hernández Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativas, cualitativas y mixtas. McGraw-Gill.

Introzzi, I., Canet-Juric, L., Aydmune, Y., & Stelzer, F. (2016). Perspectivas teóricas y evidencia empírica sobre la inhibición. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 25(2), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v25n2.52011

Introzzi, I., Canet-Juric, L., Montes, S., López, S., & Mascarello, G. (2015). Procesos inhibitorios y flexibilidad cognitiva: evidencia a favor de la teoría de la inercia atencional. International Journal of Psychological Research, 8(2), 60-74.

Joyce, A., & Hrin, S. (2015). Attention: an evolving construct. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 4(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2015.1005476

Klein, R. M. (2022). Thinking about attention: successive approximations to a productive taxonomy. Cognition, 225, 105137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105137

Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391

Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Meneres-Sancho, S., Delgado-Pardo, G., Aires-González, M. M., & Moreno-García, I. (2015). Tests de ejecución continua: Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA/CPT) y TDAH. Una revisión. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 2(2), 107-113.

Mesulam, M. M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Annals of Neurology, 28(5), 597-613.

Mirsky, A. F., & Duncan, C. C. (2001). A nosology of disorders of attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 931, 17-32.

Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129

Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862.

Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research and theory. Vol. 4 (pp. 1-18). Plenum Press.

Pillai, R., & Yathiraj, A. (2017). Auditory, visual and auditory-visual memory and sequencing performance in typically developing children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 100, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.06.010

Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.

Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2014). Attention to learning of school subjects. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(1), 14-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2014.02.003

Reindl, E., Völter, C. J., Campbell-May, J., Call, J., & Seed, A. M. (2022). Exploring the development of attentional set shifting in young children with a novel intradimensional/extradimensional shift task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 221, 105428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105428

Reynolds, G. D., & Romano, A. C. (2016). The development of attention systems and working memory in infancy. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00015

Richard’s, M. M., Comesaña, A., Zamora, E. V., Canet-Juric, L., & Introzzi, I. (2020). Presentación de la batería de tareas de autorregulación cognitiva (TAC). Estudios en distintas poblaciones. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 12(1), 60-61.

Richard’s, M., Introzzi, I., Zamora, E., & Vernucci, S. (2016). Analysis of internal and external validity criteria for a computerized visual search task. A pilot study. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 6(2), 110-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2015.1083433

Rodríguez, G., & Castillo, H. (2018). Tareas de búsqueda visual: modelos, bases neurológicas, utilidad y prospectiva. Universitas Psychologica, 17(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.111 44/Javeriana.upsy17-1.tbvm

Slattery, E. J., Ryan, P., Fortune, D. G., & McAvinue, L. P. (2021). Contributions of working memory and sustained attention to children’s reading achievement: a commonality analysis approach. Cognitive Development, 58, 101028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101028

Thurstone, L. L., & Yela, M. (2012). Caras-R test de percepción de diferencias. TEA Ediciones.

Zelazo, P. D., Blair, C. B., & Willoughby, M. T. (2016). Executive function: implications for education (NCER 2017-2000). National Center for Education Research-Institute of Education Sciences-U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.