Juridificación y penalidad: límites del discurso internacional de los derechos humanos en materia de violencia contra las mujeres

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.13487

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF HTML XML

Publicado: nov 1, 2023
Número: Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2024): Estudios socio-jurídicos
Sección Artículos de investigación


Palabras clave: violencia contra las mujeres derecho penal Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos penalidad

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

Silvana Tapia Tapia
Universidad de Birmingham
Marianela Espinoza Álvarez
Investigadora independiente
Genaro Tapia Tapia
Investigador independiente

Resumen

Este artículo presenta un análisis crítico de discurso aplicado a dos sistemas internacionales de derechos humanos (DDHH) en el ámbito de la violencia contra las mujeres (VCM). Se analizaron cualitativamente convenciones, jurisprudencia y materiales comunicacionales de organismos europeos e interamericanos. Los resultados sugieren una “juridificación” de las respuestas a la VCM y revelan cómo se constituye una penalidad basada en DDHH. Este modelo le atribuye múltiples virtudes a la respuesta penal, caracterizando su activación como diligencia debida. Tal paradigma tiende a marginar las experiencias de las víctimas/sobrevivientes, soslaya la violencia que ejerce el aparato penal y debilita posibles enfoques redistributivos, basados en derechos económicos y sociales. Se sugiere que estos se profundicen en una futura agenda de investigación.

Biografía del autor/a

Marianela Espinoza Álvarez, Investigadora independiente

Abogada por la Universidad del Azuay (Cuenca, Ecuador).

Genaro Tapia Tapia, Investigador independiente

Magíster en Comunicación por la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO, Sede Ecuador). Se desempeña como asesor comunicacional para instituciones de difusión cultural y ONGs desde 2018. Se ha desempeñado como asesor legislativo.

Cómo citar
Tapia Tapia, S., Espinoza Álvarez, M., & Tapia Tapia, G. . (2023). Juridificación y penalidad: límites del discurso internacional de los derechos humanos en materia de violencia contra las mujeres. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.13487
Referencias bibliográfica

Aguirre Salas, A., Léon, T., & Ribadeneira González, N. S. (2020). Sistema penitenciario y población penalizada durante la Revolución Ciudadana (2007-2017). URVio, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, 27, 94-110. https://doi.org/10.17141/urvio.27.2020.4303

Aliverti, A., Henrique, C., Chamberlen, A., & Sozzo, M. (Eds.). (2023). Decolonizing the Criminal Question. Colonial legacies, contemporary problems. Oxford University Press.

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2012). Artavia Murillo y otros (Fertilización in Vitro) Vs. Costa Rica. Serie C No. 257. (November 28, 2012). https://www.corteidh.or.cr/cf/lurisprudencia2/ficha_tecnica.cfm7nId_Fi-cha=235

Aviram, H. (2020). Progressive punitivism: Notes on the use of punitive social control to advance social justice ends. Buffalo Law Review, 68 (1), 199-245. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi7handle=hein.journals/buflr68&section=8

Bacchi, C. L. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. Sage.

Bacchi, C. L. (2005). Discourse, discourse everywhere: Subject "agency" in feminist discourse methodology. Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 13 (3), 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740600600407

Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Pearson.

Bacchi, C. L. (2012). Why study problematisations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1-8. https://www.scirp.org/html/18803.html

Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2008). Applications of multimodal concordances. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 21 (41), 11-41. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v21i41.96812

Bernstein, E. (2012). Carceral politics as gender justice? The "traffic in women" and neoliberal circuits of crime, sex, and rights. Theory and Society, 41 (3), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-012-9165-9

Bracco Bruce, L. (2022). Prison in Peru. Ethnographic, Feminist and Decolonial Perspectives. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84409-7

Buchely, L. (2015). Imaginarios sobre prácticas judiciales en Cali, Colombia. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 19(52), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.52.2015.1687

Carvalho, H. (2022). Dangerous patterns: Joint enterprise and the culture of criminal law. Social & Legal Studies, 32(3), 335-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639221119351

Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783

Coba Mejia, L. (2015). Sitiadas: la criminalización de las pobres en Ecuador. Flacso Ecuador.

Comisión Interamericana de Mujeres. (2014, november 25). Convención Belém Do Pará Y Su Mecanismo De Seguimiento (MESECVI). [Archivo de Video].Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8vxJ6UHhyE

Comisión Interamericana de Mujeres. (2015, mayo 6). Violencia Sexual y Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos. [Archivo de Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHwlPM7YTls

Consejo de Europa. (2011). Convenio del Consejo de Europa sobre prevención y lucha contra la violencia contra las mujeres y la violencia doméstica. Council of Europe Treaty Series, No. 210. https://rm.coe.int/1680462543

Corrigan, R. (2013). Up against a wall: Rape reform and the failure of success. NYU Press.

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2006). Penal Miguel Castro Castro Vs. Perú, Serie C No. 181 (November 25, 2006). https://www.cor-teidh.or.cr/cf/jurisprudencia2/ficha_tecnica.cfm?nId_Ficha=197&lang=es

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2009). González y otras ("Campo Algodonero") vs. México. Series C No. 205. (November 16, 2009). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_205_esp.pdf

Council of Europe. (2021). The four pillars of the Istanbul Convention. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/coe-istanbulconvention-brochure-en-r03-v01/1680a06d4f

Council of Europe & Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2016). Dialogue Across the Atlantic: Selected Case-Law of the European and Inter-American Human Rights Courts. Wolf Legal Publishers. https://www.amazon.com/Dialogue-Across-Atlantic-Selected-Inter-American/dp/9462402809

Cradle Community. (2021). Brick by Brick: How we build a world without prisons. Hajar Press. https://www.hajarpress.com/books/brick-by-brick

Davis, A. Y. (2005). Abolition democracy: Beyond empire, prisons, and torture. Seven Stories Press.

De Aquino, S. (2013). Organizing to monitor implementation of the Maria da Penha law in Brazil. In M. Al-Sharmani (Ed.), Feminist Activism, Women's Rights, and Legal Reform (pp. 177-202). Zed Books. https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/F/bo20842428.html

Douzinas, C. (2014, August 7). Human rights and the paradoxes of liberalism. openDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/human-rights-and-paradoxes-of-liberalism/

Engle, K. (2015). Anti-impunity and the turn to criminal law in human rights. Cornell Law Review, 100(5), 1069. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol100/iss5/2

Engle, K., Miller, Z., & Davis, D. M. (Eds.). (2016). Anti-impunity and the human rights agenda. Cambridge University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Anti-Impunity-Human-Rights-Agenda-Karen/dp/1107439221

Eslava, L., & Buchely, L. (2019). Security and development? A story about petty crime, the petty state and its petty law. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 67, 40-55. https://doi.org/10.7440/res67.2019.04

European Court of Human Rights. (2005). Case of Siliadin v. France, Application no. 73316/01 (July 26, 2005). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69891

European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Opuz v. Turkey, 33401/02 (June 9, 2009). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92945

European Court of Human Rights. (2013). Valiuliené v. Lithuania, 33234/07 (March 16, 2013). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636

Farrelly, M. (2020). Critical Discourse Analysis. sage Publications Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036815631

Foucault, M. (2003). "Society must be defended": Lectures at the College de France, 1975-76 (1st ed.). Picador.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001

Fulchiron, A. (2018). La ley de mujeres: amor, poder propio y autoridad: mujeres sobrevivientes de violación sexual en guerra reinventan la justicia desde el cuerpo, la vida y la comunidad [Tesis de doctorado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México]. https://doi.org/https://ru.dgb.unam.mx/handle/DGB_UNAM/TES01000780325

Garland, D. (2012). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.

Garland, D. (2013). Penality and the penal state. Criminology, an Interdisciplinary Journal, 51 (3), 475-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12015

Gartner, R., & Macmillan, R. (1995). The effect of victim-offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37(3), 393-429. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.373.393

Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag. Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. University of California Press.

Goldstein, D. M. (2012). Outlawed: Between Security and Rights in a Bolivian City. Duke University Press.

Goodmark, L. (2018). Decriminalizing domestic violence: A balanced policy approach to intimate partner violence (First ed.). University of California Press.

Goodmark, L. (2021). Gender-based violence, law reform, and the criminalization of survivors of violence. International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, 10 (4), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.1994

Halley, J., Kotiswaran, P., Shamir, H., & Rebouché, R. (2018). Governance feminism: An introduction. University of Minnesota Press.

Hernández Castillo, R. A. (2017). Activismo legal y talleres penitenciarios. Las paradojas de la antropología jurídica feminista y del trabajo cultural en espacios de reclusión. In R. A. Hernández Castillo (Ed.), Resistencias penitenciarias. Investigación activista de espacios de reclusión (pp. 51-82). Juan Pablos Editor.

Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2, 34-61.

Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2016). Analysing discourses and dispositives: A Foucauldian approach to theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 109-136). Sage.

Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2011). Jessica Lenahan Gonzales and others v. United States of America, Caso 12.626 Informe No. 80/11. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/11/5212/11.pdf

Johnson, H. (2012). Limits of a criminal justice response: Trends in police and court processing of sexual assault. In E. A. Sheehy (Ed.), Sexual Assault in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women's Activism (pp. 613-634). University of Ottawa Press.

Kapur, R. (2018). Gender, alterity and human rights: Freedom in a fishbowl. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Kim, M. E. (2019). Anti-carceral feminism: The contradictions of progress and the possibilities of counter-hegemonic struggle. Affilia, 35(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919878276

Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Lamble, S. (2013). Queer necropolitics and the expanding carceral state: Interrogating sexual investments in punishment. Law and Critique, 24(3), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-013-9125-1

Lange, B. (2011). Foucauldian-inspired discourse analysis. A contribution to critical environmental law scholarship? In A. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (Ed.), Law and Ecology: New Environmental Foundations (pp. 39-64). Rout-ledge. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ViyDRAAACAAJ

Lavrysen, L., & Mavronicola, N. (Eds.). (2020). Coercive Human Rights: positive duties to mobilise the criminal law under the ECHR. Hart Publishing.

MacKinnon, C. (2005). Women's lives, men's laws. Harvard University Press.

Machado, J. (2022, February 5). Boletas de auxilio no garantizan la seguridad de las víctimas de agresión. Primicias. https://www.primicias.ec/noticias/sociedad/femicidio-boleta-auxilio-ciclo-violencia-mujeres/

Mahoney, M. R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90(1), 1-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289533

Maier, S. L. (2008). "I have heard horrible stories rape victim advocates' perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence against Women, 14(7), 786-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208320245

Mavronicola, N. (2020a). Coercive overreach, dilution and diversion: The potential dangers of aligning human rights protection with criminal law (enforcement). In L. Lavrysen & N. Mavronicola (Eds.), Coercive Human Rights: Positive duties to mobilise the criminal law under the echr (pp. 183-202). Hart Publishing.

Mavronicola, N. (2020b, October 23). Redistributing Punishment: The Limited Vision of Coercive Human Rights. ejil: Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/redistributing-punishment-the-limited-vision-of-coercive-human-rights/

Mujeres de Frente. (2022, November 24). Making a living: Building new worlds against punitivism and the state. Critical resistance. https://criticalresistance.org/abolitionist/sneak-peek-issue-38-ecuador/

Niemi-Kiesiläinen, J., Honkatukia, P., & Ruuskanen, M. (2007). Legal texts as discourses. In A. Gunnarsson, E.-M. Svensson & M. Davies (Eds.), Exploiting the limits of law (pp. 69-87). Ashgate.

Orenstein, A. (1998). Evidence and Feminism. In B. W. Taylor, S. Rush & R. J. Munro (Eds.), Feminist jurisprudence, women and the law: Critical essays, research agenda, and bibliography (pp. 509-540). Rothman & Co.

Organization of American States and Council of Europe. (2014). Regional tools to fight violence against women. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibp-cajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://www.oas.org/en/mesecvi/docs/mesecvi-coe-cswpub-en.pdf

Organización de los Estados Americanos. (1994). Convención interamericana para prevenir, sancionar y erradicar la violencia contra la mujer. "Convención de Belém do Pará," A-61. Departamento de Derecho Internacional. https://www.oas.org/juridico/spanish/tratados/a-61.html

Pérez, M., & Radi, B. (2020). Gender punitivism: Queer perspectives on identity politics in criminal justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice: The International Journal of Policy and Practice, 20(5), 523-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820941561

Piechestein, A. C., Monclus Masó, M., Brigandi, J., & Martinez Magarzo, Q. (2023). Miradas de los feminismos a la justicia penal: límites y posibilidades para la protección y respuesta eficiente a los conflictos de personas en situación de violencia de género. Cálamo, 19, 10-26. https://doi.org/10.61243/calamo.19.5

Pinto, M. (2020a). Historical trends of Human Rights gone criminal. Human Rights Quarterly, 42(4), 729-761. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2020.0039

Pinto, M. (2020b). Sowing a "Culture of Conviction" what shall domestic criminal justice systems reap from coercive human rights? In L. Lavrysen & N. Mavronicola (Eds.), Coercive Human Rights: Positive Duties to mobilise the criminal law under the ECHR (Hart studies in security and justice). Hart Publishing.

Pinto, M. (2022). Discursive alignment of trafficking, rights and crime control. International Journal of Law in Context, 19 (2), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552322000209

Pinto, M. (2023). Coercive human rights and the forgotten history of the council of Europe's report on decriminalisation. The Modern Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12793

Sattar, A. (2019). Criminal Punishment and Human Rights: Convenient Morality (1st ed.). Routledge.

Schreier, M. (2019). Content Analysis, Qualitative. SAGE Research Methods Foundations; sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036753373

Scott, D. (2016). Regarding rights for the other: Abolitionism and human rights from below. In L. Weber, E. Fishwick & M. Marmo (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Criminology and Human Rights (pp. 50-62). Routledge.

Segato, R. L. (2014). El sexo y la norma: frente estatal, patriarcado, desposesión, colonialidad. Revista Estudos Feministas, 22(2), 593-616. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2014000200012

Sieder, R. (2020). The juridification of politics. In M.-C. Foblets, M. Goodale, M. Sapignoli & O. Zenker (Eds.), The oxford handbook of law and anthropology. Oxford University Press.

Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford University Press.

Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. Routledge.

Snider, L. (1998). Towards safer societies: Punishment, masculinities and violence against women. The British Journal of Criminology, 38 (1), 1-39. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315095295-26/towards-safer-societies-snider-laureen

Spade, D. (2015). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law (Revised and expanded edition). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374794 isbn electronic: 978-0-8223-7479-4

Sudbury, J. (Ed.). (2005). Global lockdown: Race, gender, and the prison-industrial complex. Routledge.

Tapia Tapia, S. (2021). Beyond carceral expansion: Survivors' experiences of using specialised courts for violence against women in Ecuador. Social & Legal Studies, 30 (6), 848-868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920973747

Tapia Tapia, S. (2023). Human rights penality and violence against women: The coloniality of disembodied justice. Law and Critique, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09355-4

Tapia Tapia, S., & Bedford, K. (2021). Specialised (in)security: Violence against women, criminal courts, and the gendered presence of the state in Ecuador. Latin American Law Review, 7, 21-42. https://doi.org/10.29263/lar07.2021.02

Terwiel, A. (2020). What is carceral feminism? Political Theory, 48(4), 421-442.https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591719889946

Teubner, G. (1987). Juridification. Concepts, aspects, limits, solutions. In G. Teubner (Ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres. A comparative analysis in the areas of labor, corporate, antitrust and social welfare law (pp. 3-47). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110921472

Tulkens, F. (2011). The paradoxical relationship between criminal law and human rights. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 9 (3), 577-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqr028

UN Women. (2015). A framework to underpin action to prevent violence against women. un Women. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2015/11/prevention-framework

Uprimny Yepes, R. (2016). Reparaciones transformadoras: un mecanismo para aliviar las tensiones entre justicia correctiva y justicia distributiva. In M. García Villegas & M. A. Ceballos Bedoya (Eds.), Democracia, justicia y sociedad: diez años de investigación en Dejusticia (pp. 741-754). Dejusticia-Centro de estudios de derecho, justicia y sociedad. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7110008

Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A. E., Burney, E., & Wikstrom, P.-O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. University of Cambridge Address Institute of Criminology.

Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.

Whalley, E., & Hackett, C. (2017). Carceral feminisms: The abolitionist project and undoing dominant feminisms. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(4), 456-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2017.1383762

What Works-Evidence Hub. (2023, April). What Works to Prevent Violence. https://www.whatworks.co.za/resources

Whynacht, A. (2021). Insurgent Love: Abolition and Domestic Homicide. Fernwood Publishing Co Ltd.

Wills, J. (2014). The world turned upside down? Neo-liberalism, socioeconomic rights, and hegemony. Leiden Journal of International Law, 27(1), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156513000629

Estadísticas de consulta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Métricas de publicación

203 6




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.

Bajo la licencia Atribución No Comercial (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Se puede compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra y hacer obras derivadas, siempre y cuando se reconozcan los créditos del autor. 

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.