Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

This paper analyzes the impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on the academic performance of students in Colombia, specifically in mathematics and reading. Using data from secondary school students between 2017 and 2019, ICT access is measured through the availability of computers and Internet. The results indicate that access to ict improves mathematics scores by 0.068 standard deviations, while no significant effect is observed in reading. Additionally, having a computer without Internet access does not affect scores. These findings provide relevant insights for policies aimed at reducing the digital divide. No differential effects are found between males and females.

Rodríguez Arenas, J. L., & Gamboa, L. F. (2024). Does access to ICTs equally matter for men and women in terms of academic exam performance? The case of middle education in Colombia. Revista De Economía Del Rosario, 26(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/economia/a.14427

Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal, 112 (482), 735–765.

Barrera-Osorio, F., & Linden, L. L. (2009). The use and misuse of computers in education: evidence from a randomized experiment in Colombia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (4836).

Basavaraja, M., & Sampath Kumar, B. (2017). Gender disparities in the use of ict: A survey of students in urban schools. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 5 (4), 39–48.

Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016). Technology and education: Computers, software, and the Internet. In Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 5, pp. 239–280). Elsevier.

Campos, D. G., & Scherer, R. (2024). Digital gender gaps in students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills: an integrative data analysis across 32 countries. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (1), 655–693.

Checchi, D., Rettore, E., & Girardi, S. (2019). IC technology and learning: an impact evaluation of Cl@ssi 2.0. Education Economics, 27 (3), 241–264.

Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Cueto, S., Santiago, A., & Severín, E. (2017). Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9 (3), 295–320.

Feng, S., Wong, Y. K., Wong, L. Y., & Hossain, L. (2019). The Internet and Facebook usage on academic distraction of college students. Computers & Education, 134, 41–49.

Gil-Flores, J., Torres-Gordillo, J. J., & Perera-Rodríguez, V. H. (2012). The role of online reader experience in explaining students’ performance in digital reading. Computers & Education, 59 (2), 653–660.

Goolsbee, A., & Guryan, J. (2006). The impact of Internet subsidies in public schools. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (2), 336–347.

Hanafizadeh, M. R., Saghaei, A., & Hanafizadeh, P. (2009). An index for cross-country analysis of ict infrastructure and access. Telecommunications Policy, 33 (7), 385–405.

Hu, J., & Yu, R. (2021). The effects of ict-based social media on adolescents’ digital reading performance: A longitudinal study of pisa 2009, pisa 2012, pisa 2015 and pisa 2018. Computers & Education, 175, 104342.

Hunley, S. A., Krise, J., Rich, T., & Schell, C. (2005). Adolescent computer use. Adolescence, 40 (158).

ICFES, S. (2013). Sistema nacional de evaluación estandarizada de la educación alineación del examen saber 11. Bogotá D.C.: ICFES.

Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & education, 58 (1), 162– 171.

Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in human behavior, 26 (6), 1237–1245.

Lambić, D. (2016). Correlation between Facebook use for educational purposes and academic performance of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 313–320.

Lei, J, & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Com puters & Education, 49 (2), 284–296.

Leuven, E., Lindahl, M., Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2007). The effect of extra funding for disadvantaged pupils on achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (4), 721–736.

Martínez-Domínguez, M., & Mora-Rivera, J. (2020). Internet adoption and usage patterns in rural Mexico. Technology in society, 60, 101226.

Muls, J., Thomas, V., De Backer, F., Zhu, C., & Lombaerts, K. (2020). Identifying the nature of social media policies in high schools. Education and Information Technologies, 25 (1), 281–305.

Muñoz, J. S. (2018). The economics behind the math gender gap: Colombian evidence on the role of sample selection. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 368–391.

Ome, A., & Gamboa, L. (2021). Permanencia y valor agregado en la enseñanza media en Colombia. Vniversitas Económica, 21(1). Universidad Javeriana.

Posso, A. (2016). Internet usage and educational outcomes among 15-year old Australian students. International Journal of Communication, 10, 26.

Román Carrasco, M., & Murillo Torrecilla, F. J. (2012). Learning environments with techno- logical resources: a look at their contribution to student performance in Latin American elementary schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60 (6), 1107–1128.

Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ict development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58.

Su, W., Han, X., Yu, H., Wu, Y., & Potenza, M. N. (2020). Do men become addicted to Internet gaming and women to social media? a metaanalysis examining gender-related differences in specific Internet addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106480.

Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. Cyberpsychology and behavior, 3 (2), 167–178.

Wu, J. Y., & Peng, Y. C. (2017). The modality effect on reading literacy: Perspectives from students’ online reading habits, cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and web navigation skills across regions. Interactive Learning Environments, 25 (7), 859–876.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.