Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

Este artículo analiza el impacto de las Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación (TIC) en el rendimiento académico de estudiantes en Colombia, específicamente en matemáticas y lectura. Utilizando datos de estudiantes de secundaria entre 2017 y 2019, se mide el acceso a TIC a través de la disponibilidad de computadoras e Internet. Los resultados indican que el acceso a TIC mejora las puntuaciones en matemáticas en 0.068 desviaciones estándar, mientras que no se observa un efecto significativo en lectura. Además, tener una computadora sin acceso a Internet no impacta las puntuaciones. Estos hallazgos proporcionan información relevante para políticas que buscan reducir la brecha digital. No se encuentran efectos diferenciales entre hombres y mujeres.

Rodríguez Arenas, J. L., & Gamboa, L. F. (2024). Desmontando mitos: ¿Favorecen realmente las TIC a un género en la educación media? El caso de Colombia. Revista De Economía Del Rosario, 26(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/economia/a.14427

Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal, 112 (482), 735–765.

Barrera-Osorio, F., & Linden, L. L. (2009). The use and misuse of computers in education: evidence from a randomized experiment in Colombia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (4836).

Basavaraja, M., & Sampath Kumar, B. (2017). Gender disparities in the use of ict: A survey of students in urban schools. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 5 (4), 39–48.

Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016). Technology and education: Computers, software, and the Internet. In Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 5, pp. 239–280). Elsevier.

Campos, D. G., & Scherer, R. (2024). Digital gender gaps in students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills: an integrative data analysis across 32 countries. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (1), 655–693.

Checchi, D., Rettore, E., & Girardi, S. (2019). IC technology and learning: an impact evaluation of Cl@ssi 2.0. Education Economics, 27 (3), 241–264.

Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Cueto, S., Santiago, A., & Severín, E. (2017). Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9 (3), 295–320.

Feng, S., Wong, Y. K., Wong, L. Y., & Hossain, L. (2019). The Internet and Facebook usage on academic distraction of college students. Computers & Education, 134, 41–49.

Gil-Flores, J., Torres-Gordillo, J. J., & Perera-Rodríguez, V. H. (2012). The role of online reader experience in explaining students’ performance in digital reading. Computers & Education, 59 (2), 653–660.

Goolsbee, A., & Guryan, J. (2006). The impact of Internet subsidies in public schools. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (2), 336–347.

Hanafizadeh, M. R., Saghaei, A., & Hanafizadeh, P. (2009). An index for cross-country analysis of ict infrastructure and access. Telecommunications Policy, 33 (7), 385–405.

Hu, J., & Yu, R. (2021). The effects of ict-based social media on adolescents’ digital reading performance: A longitudinal study of pisa 2009, pisa 2012, pisa 2015 and pisa 2018. Computers & Education, 175, 104342.

Hunley, S. A., Krise, J., Rich, T., & Schell, C. (2005). Adolescent computer use. Adolescence, 40 (158).

ICFES, S. (2013). Sistema nacional de evaluación estandarizada de la educación alineación del examen saber 11. Bogotá D.C.: ICFES.

Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & education, 58 (1), 162– 171.

Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in human behavior, 26 (6), 1237–1245.

Lambić, D. (2016). Correlation between Facebook use for educational purposes and academic performance of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 313–320.

Lei, J, & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Com puters & Education, 49 (2), 284–296.

Leuven, E., Lindahl, M., Oosterbeek, H., & Webbink, D. (2007). The effect of extra funding for disadvantaged pupils on achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (4), 721–736.

Martínez-Domínguez, M., & Mora-Rivera, J. (2020). Internet adoption and usage patterns in rural Mexico. Technology in society, 60, 101226.

Muls, J., Thomas, V., De Backer, F., Zhu, C., & Lombaerts, K. (2020). Identifying the nature of social media policies in high schools. Education and Information Technologies, 25 (1), 281–305.

Muñoz, J. S. (2018). The economics behind the math gender gap: Colombian evidence on the role of sample selection. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 368–391.

Ome, A., & Gamboa, L. (2021). Permanencia y valor agregado en la enseñanza media en Colombia. Vniversitas Económica, 21(1). Universidad Javeriana.

Posso, A. (2016). Internet usage and educational outcomes among 15-year old Australian students. International Journal of Communication, 10, 26.

Román Carrasco, M., & Murillo Torrecilla, F. J. (2012). Learning environments with techno- logical resources: a look at their contribution to student performance in Latin American elementary schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60 (6), 1107–1128.

Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ict development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58.

Su, W., Han, X., Yu, H., Wu, Y., & Potenza, M. N. (2020). Do men become addicted to Internet gaming and women to social media? a metaanalysis examining gender-related differences in specific Internet addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106480.

Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two-sample comparison. Cyberpsychology and behavior, 3 (2), 167–178.

Wu, J. Y., & Peng, Y. C. (2017). The modality effect on reading literacy: Perspectives from students’ online reading habits, cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and web navigation skills across regions. Interactive Learning Environments, 25 (7), 859–876.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.