Main Article Content

Authors

The concept of media accountability encompasses the responsibility of the media toward the audiences as well as the mechanisms and instruments that can be used to hold media accountable to citizens in a democratic society. However, from its public function, the press cannot fulfill its regulatory functions and may create damage without violating the law. Through media accountability instruments, journalists can safeguard the quality of their work, strengthen their ethical compliance, and gain public trust to restore their credibility, legitimacy, and reputation. This study seeks to understand, from the perspective of media directors and editors in Chile, the extent of knowledge and perception of media accountability indicators of the press in Chile, particularly self-regulation, given the limited number of studies on this subject. Based on an exploratory study using qualitative methodology, we conducted eleven semistructured interviews with media professionals from the country’s television, newspapers, radio, and digital platforms. They shared their perspectives on self-regulation mechanisms present in Chilean media. The findings revealed that these mechanisms are characterized by a prevalence of orality as a tool for self-regulation, absence of other mechanisms such as those described in the literature, and identification of elements that are not part of media accountability instruments.

Hormazabal, C. (2024). Media Accountability in Chile: The ‘Oral Tradition’ as a Self-Regulation Instrument. Anuario Electrónico De Estudios En Comunicación Social "Disertaciones", 17(2). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/disertaciones/a.13219

Aznar, H. (1999). Comunicación responsable: la autorregulación de los medios. Ariel Comunicación.

Aznar, H. (2005). Ética de la comunicación y nuevos retos sociales: códigos y recomendaciones para los medios. Paidós.

Bardoel, J., & D’Haenens, L. (2004). Media meet the citizen: beyond market mechanisms and government regulations. European Journal of Communication, 19(2), 165-194.

Bastian, M. (2019). Media and accountability in Latin America: framework, conditions, instruments. In Media and accountability in Latin America (pp. 453-493). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24787-4

Bertrand, C.-J. (Ed.). (2000). Media ethics and accountability systems. Routledge.

Bertrand, C.-J. (2005). Introduction: media accountability. Pacific Journalism Review, 11(2), 5-16.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Camaj, L. (2023). The monitorial role of crowdsourced journalism: audience engagement in corruption reporting in nonprofit newsrooms. Journalism Practice, 17(5), 911-929. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1960587

Campbell, A. J. (1999). Self-regulation and the media. Federal Communications Law Journal, 51(3), 711.

Centro de Estudios Públicos (cep). (2022). Estudio Nacional de Opinión Pública Nº 86, abril-mayo 2022. https://www.cepchile.cl/encuesta/estudio-nacional-de-opinion-publica-n86-abril-mayo-2022/

Colegio de Periodistas de Chile. (2015). Código de Ética. https://www.colegiodeperiodistas.cl/p/etica-periodistica.html

Consejo Nacional de Televisión (cntv). (2022). ¿Qué es el cntv? https://www.cntv.cl/acerca-del-cntv/

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Desantes, J. M. (1973). El autocontrol de la actividad informativa. Edicusa.

Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., & Karmasin, M. (2017). The European handbook of media accountability. Routledge.

Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., & Karmasin, M. (2019). Media accountability in the era of post-truth politics: European challenges and perspectives. Routledge.

Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Lauk, E., & Leppik-Bork, T. (2011). Mapping media accountability-in Europe and beyond. Herbert von Halem Verlag Köln.

Elliott, D., & Ozar, D. (2010). An explanation and a method for the ethics of journalism. In C. Meyers (Ed)., Journalism ethics: a philosophical approach (pp. 9-24). Oxford University Press.

Fengler, S., Eberwein, T., Mazzoleni, G., Porlezza, C., & Russ-Mohl, S. (2014). Journalists and media accountability: an international study of news people in the digital age. Peter Lang.

Fengler, S. (2019). Accountability in journalism. In Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.772

Fengler, S., Eberwein, T., & Karmasin, M. (2021). The global handbook of media accountability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326943

García, A. (2010). Realidad del periodismo y los medios en Chile. ComHumanitas: Revista Científica de Comunicación, 1(1), 71-77.

Greene, F., & Lecaros, M. J. (2020). The concept of self-regulation and the ethics council of the media federation of Chile. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(4), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-11-2019-0127

Gutiérrez, F., & Hormazábal, C. H. (2022). Chile: double system of self-regulation and a few union organizations. In The global handbook of media accountability (pp. 481-490). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326943-56

Koliska, M. (2022). Trust and journalistic transparency online. Journalism Studies, 23(12), 1488-1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2102532

Lecaros, M. J. (1991). ¿Quién controla la ética periodística? Cuadernos.Info, (7), 67-83.

Ley 19733 de 2001 (4 de junio) sobre Libertades de Opinión e Información y Ejercicio del Periodismo. https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=186049

Mauri-Rios, M., Ramon-Vegas, X., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., & Díaz-Campo, J. (2022). Indicadores para evaluar la rendición de cuentas en los medios de comunicación. Cuadernos.Info, (51), 1-27.

McQuail, D. (2003). Media accountability and freedom of publication. Oxford University Press.

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. sage Publications.

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf

Ortega, D. (2017). Retos de la libertad de información. Dykinson.

Porlezza, C., & Di Salvo, P. (2020). The accountability and transparency of whistleblowing platforms issues of networked journalism and contested boundaries. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2285-2304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1842233

Real Rodríguez, E. (2008). Herramientas éticas y deontológicas para la excelencia informativa en el periodismo. Defensa del Colegio Profesional como base angular. En El derecho a la información judicial. 6º Congreso Internacional de Ética y Derecho de la Información (pp.433-456). Fundación coso de la Comunidad Valenciana para el Desarrollo de la Comunicación y la Sociedad.

Robertson, C. (2023). Sources and drivers of news media criticism. In Reuters Institute digital news report 2023 (pp. 40-43). Reuters Institute.

Suárez-Villegas, J. C. (2015). Self-regulation of offline and online journalism in Spain in the experience of the Arbitration, Complaints and Ethics Commission. Communication & Society, 28(3), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.28.3.135-149

Von Krogh, T. (2012). Understanding media accountability: media accountability in relation to media criticism and media governance in Sweden 1940-2010. Department of Information Technology and Media, Mid Sweden University.

Ward, S. J., & Wasserman, H. (2010). Towards an open ethics: implications of new media platforms for global ethics discourse. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2010.512825

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.