Main Article Content

Authors

The skills and psycholinguistic competences in the mother tongue (L1) seem to play a fundamental role in the acquisition and learning of a second language (L2). The purpose of this study was to establish the psycholinguistic predictors of the L1 for the acquisition and learning of English as an L2. The sample was made up of 111 children, students in public schools of the city of Medellín. The results of this research project suggest that there are two psycholinguistic factors considered as strong predictors of L1 for the acquisition of English as an L2, the first factor was named syntactic analysis and the second one phono-lexical. In conclusion, the skills in L1 and the aptitudes for the acquisition of the L2 are closely related or at least the psycholinguistic profile in L1 is fundamental for the acquisition and learning of English as an L2. 

Olber Eduardo Arango Tobón, Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigó

Psicólogo. Magister en Neuropsicología

Isabel Cristina Puerta Lopera, Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigo

Psicóloga; doctora en Psicología.

Paula Andrea Montoya Zuluaga, Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigo

Psicóloga; doctora en Psicología.

José Wilmar Sánchez Duque, Fundación Universitaria Luis Amigo

Reeducador; doctor en Psicología.

Arango Tobón, O. E., Puerta Lopera, I. C., Montoya Zuluaga, P. A., & Sánchez Duque, J. W. (2013). Psycholinguistic predictors of the acquisition and learning of English as a second language. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 31(3), 546–555. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.2228

Bell, N. L., Lassiter, K. S., Matthews, T., & Hutchinson, M. B. (2001). Comparison of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition and Wechsler Adult Intelligence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(3), 417-422.

Bosh, L. (1983). El desarrollo fonológico infantil: una prueba para su evaluación. Anuario de Psicología. 28(1), 86-114 .

Bravo, V. L., Villalón, M. & Orellana, E. (2004) Los procesos cognitivos y el aprendizaje de la lectura inicial: diferencias cognitivas entre buenos lectores y lectores deficientes. Estudios. pedagógicos. 30, 7-19.

Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959, 2000). Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT): Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp. Republished by Second Language Testing, Inc., www.2LTI.com.

Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.

Dunn, Ll., Dunn, L.M., & Arribas, A. (2006). PPUT – III Peabody, Test de vocabulario en imágenes. Madrid, TEA ediciones.

Georgiou, G.K., Parrilla. R., & Papadopoulos. T.C. (2008). Predictors of Word decoding and Reading Fluency across Languages Varying in Orthographic Consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology. 100(3), 566-580.

Heinze, E., Prieto, M. F., Sampaio, A., & Gonçalves, O. (2007). Valoración interlingüística de la producción verbal a partir de una tarea narrativa en el síndrome de Williams. (Spanish). Psicothema, 19(3), 428-434.

Krashen. S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. London: Pergamon Press.

Lervag, A., Braten, I., & Hulme, C. (2009). The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early Reading development: A Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology. 45(3), 764-781.

Proutt, H.T & Schwartz, J.F. (1984). Validity of Peabody picture vocabulary test – revised with mentally retarded adults. Journal of clinical psychology. 40(2), 584 – 587.

Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude, and working memory on adult incidental SLA: a replication and extensión of Keber, Walkenfield, adn Hernstadt (1991). In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211 – 266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (2007). The science of reading: A handbook. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Skehan, P., & Ducroquet, L. (1988). A comparison of first and foreign language ability. ESOL Department, Institute of Education, London University: Working Documents No. 8.

Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences? Modern Language Journal, 75, 3–16.

Sparks, R. (1995). Examining the linguistic coding differences hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 187–214.

Sparks, R., Artzer, M., Javorsky, J., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Miller, K., et al. (1998). Students classified as learning disabled (LD) and non learning disabled students: Two comparison studies of native language skill, foreign language aptitude, and foreign language proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 531–551.

Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term cross linguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59, 203–243.

Sparks, R., Patton, J., & Ganschow, L. (2012). Profiles of more and less successful L2 learners: A cluster analysis study. Learning and Individual Differences. 22, 463-472.

Yopp, H.K. (1995). A test for assessing phonemic awareness in Young children. The Reading Teacher, 49, 20-29.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.