Control inhibitorio en perros domésticos:¿qué sabemos hasta ahora?

Jesica Paola FAGNANI; Gabriela Barrera; Mariana Bentosela

doi:10.12804/apl34.3.2016.11

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

Control inhibitorio en perros domésticos:¿qué sabemos hasta ahora?

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/apl34.3.2016.11

PDF HTML Lector Inteligente ePub

Publicado: sept. 8, 2016

Número: Vol. 34 Núm. 3 (2016)

Sección Artículos

Palabras clave: perros inhibición impulsividad autocontrol comunicación

Autores/as

Jesica Paola FAGNANI
Icivet-UNL CONICET

Gabriela Barrera
Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento en Cánidos (ICOC) Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral, Consejo Nacional de InvestigacionesCientíficas y Técnicas (ICiVet Litoral, CONICET-UNL

Mariana Bentosela
Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento en Cánidos (ICOC) Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IDIM; CONICET-UBA)

Resumen

Este trabajo revisa el estado actual de la literatura sobre el control inhibitorio en perros domésticos (Canis familiaris). Para tal fin, previamente se pretende definir los dos paradigmas vigentes para evaluar el control inhibitorio, ejemplificarlos con algunas tareas que han sido utilizadas en perros, y finalmente revisar cuáles son los aportes y las áreas aún no estudiadas sobre la temática en estos animales. Se concluye que, a pesar de que el perro es un buen modelo de estudio, existen pocos trabajos que midan específicamente el fenómeno, y sus resultados aún no son lo suficientemente concluyentes. Esta revisión aportará de modo general al conocimiento de los procesos de control inhibitorio, y particularmente en perros domésticos. A nivel aplicado, estudiar este fenómeno es de utilidad para la mejora de las estrategias de aprendizaje y adiestramiento en las áreas de trabajo como búsqueda y rescate o terapia asistida, y en el valioso papel como mascotas, siendo por tanto de gran apoyo al bienestar humano

Biografía del autor/a

Jesica Paola FAGNANI, Icivet-UNL CONICET

Becaria Doctoral CONICET.

Gabriela Barrera, Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento en Cánidos (ICOC) Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral, Consejo Nacional de InvestigacionesCientíficas y Técnicas (ICiVet Litoral, CONICET-UNL

Becaria Doctoral CONICET.

Mariana Bentosela, Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento en Cánidos (ICOC) Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (IDIM; CONICET-UBA)

Doctora en Psicología

Cómo citar

FAGNANI, J. P., Barrera, G., & Bentosela, M. (2016). Control inhibitorio en perros domésticos:¿qué sabemos hasta ahora?. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana , 34(3), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl34.3.2016.11

Referencias bibliográfica

Addessi, E., Paglieri, F. & Focaroli, V. (2011). The ecological rationality of delay tolerance: insights from capuchin monkeys. Cognition, 119, 142–147.

Amici, F., Aureli, F. & Call, J. (2008). Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility, and inhibitory control in primates. Current Biology 18(18), 1415–1419.

Barrera, G., Elgier, A., Jakovcevic, A., Mustaca, A. & Bentosela, M. (2009). Problemas de comportamiento en los perros domésticos (canisfamiliaris): aportes de la psicología del aprendizaje. Revista de Psicología, 18, 123-146.

Bentosela, M. & Mustaca, A. (2007). Comunicación entre perros (Canisfamiliaris) y hombres: Un negocio conveniente. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 39 (2), 375-387.

Beran, M. & Evans, T. (2006). Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): The effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals. Behavioral Processes, 73(3), 315–324.

Beran, M., Evans, T.,Paglieri, F., McIntyre, J., Addessi, E. & Hopkins, W. (2014). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: A study with the hybrid delay task. Animal Cognition, 17, 197-205.

Boogert, N., Anderson, R., Peters, S., Searcy, W. & Nowicki, S. (2011). Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour reaching, but not with other cognitive measures. Animal Behaviour 81(6), 1209–1216.

Braüer, J., Bös, M., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2013). Domestic dogs (Canisfamiliaris) coordinate their actions in a problem-solving task. Animal Cognition, 16, 273–285.

Bray, E., MacLean, E. & Hare, B. (2014). Context speciﬁcity of inhibitory control in dogs. Animal Cognition 17, 15–31. Doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0633-z

Broos, N., Schmaal, L., Wiskerke, J., Kostelijk, L., Lam, T., Stoop, N. et al. (2012). The Relationship between Impulsive Choice and Impulsive Action: A Cross-Species Translational Study. PLoS ONE, 7 (5), e36781. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036781

Brosnan, S. & Beran, M. (2009).Trading behavior between conspeciﬁcs in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 181–194. Doi:10.1037/a0015092

Eagle, T. & Robbins, T. (2003). Inhibitory control in rats performing a stop-signal reaction-time task: effects of lesions of the medial striatum and D-amphetamine. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 1302–17.

Evans, T. & Beran, M. (2007). Chimpanzees use self-distraction to cope with impulsivity. Biology Letter, 22,599–602. Doi:10.1098/rsbl. 2007.0399

Evans, T., Beran, M., Paglieri, F. & Addessi, E. (2012). Delaying gratification for food and tokens in capuchin monkeys (Cebusapella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): when quantity is salient, symbolic stimuli do not improve performance, Animal Cognition, 15, 539–548. Doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0482-1

Evenden, J. (1999). Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharm, 146 (348), 361-375.

Frank, H. & Frank, M. (1983). Inhibition training in wolves anddogs. Behavioral Processes, 8, 363-377.

Fratkin, L., Sinn, D., Patall, E. & Gosling, S. (2013). Personality consistency in dogs: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 8, e54907. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054907

Freidin, E., Putrino, N., D’Orazio, M. & Bentosela, M. (2013). Dogs’ Eavesdropping from People’s Reactions in Third Party Interactions. PLoS ONE, 8, (11), e79198. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079198

Jacobs, C., van Den Broeck, W.& Simoens, P. (2006). Increased volume and neuronal number of the basolateral nuclear group of the amygdaloid body in aggressive dogs. Behavioral Brain Research, 170, 119-125.

Jakovcevic, A. & Bentosela, M. (2009). Diferencias individuales en los perros domésticos (canis familiaris): revisión de las evaluaciones conductuales. Interdisciplinaria, 26, (1), 49-76

Kubinyi, E., Vas, J., Hejjas, K., Ronai, Z., Brúder, I., Turcsán, B. et al. (2012). Polymorphism in the Tyrosine Hydroxylase (TH) Gene Is Associated with Activity-Impulsivity in German Shepherd Dogs. PLoS ONE, 7 (1), e30271. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030271

Leonardi, J., Vick, S. & Dufour, V. (2012). Waiting for more: the performance of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on exchange tasks. Animal Cognition, 15, 107–120, Doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0437-y

Lipszyc, J. & Schachar, R. (2010).Inhibitory control and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task. Journal of the International Neuropsychiatric Society, 16, 1064–1076. Doi: 10.1017/ S1355617710000895

MacLean, E., Hare, B., Nunna, C., Addessi, E., Amici, F., Andersone, R. et al. (2014). The evolution of self-control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 111 (20), 1-9. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323533111

Mazur, J. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.EnCommons, M., et al. (Eds), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value (Vol. 5; pp. 55–73). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum

McGuire, J. & Kable, J. (2012). Decision makers calibrate behavioral persistence on the basis of time-interval experience. Cognition, 124, 216–226.

Miklósi, A., Topál, J.& Csányi,V. (2004). Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us. Animal Behavior, 67, 995-100.

Miller, H., Pattison, K., DeWall, C., Rayburn-Reeves, R. & Zentall, T. (2010). Self-Control Without a ''Self''?: Common Self-Control Processes in Humans and Dogs. Psychological Science, 21, 534. Doi: 10.1177/0956797610364968

Miller, H., DeWall, N., Pattison, K., Molet, M. & Zentall, T. (2012). Too dog tired to avoid danger: Self-control depletion in canines increases behavioral approach toward an aggressive threat. Psychological Bulletin Review, 19, 535–540. Doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0231-0

Mischel, W.& Rodriguez, M. (1993).Psychological distance in self-imposed delay of gratification. EnCocking,R. &Renninger, K. (Eds.), The development and meaning of psychological distance. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Mischel, W. (2014). The Marshmallow Test: Mastering Self-control. New York: Hachette Digital, Inc.

Ostojic, L. & Clayton, N. (2013). Behavioural coordination of dogs in a cooperative problem-solving task with a conspeciﬁc and a human partner. Animal Cognition, 17, 445-459. Doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0676-1

Osvath, M. & Osvath, H. (2008). Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and orangutan (Pongoabelii) forethought: self-control and pre-experience in the face of future tool use. Animal Cognition, 11, 661–674. Doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0157-0

Paglieri, F., et al (2013). The hybrid delay task: Can capuchin monkeys (Cebusapella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so? Behavioral Processes, 94, 45-54.

Parrish, A., Perdue, B., Evans, T. & Beran, M. (2013). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) transfer token repeatedly with a partner to accumulate rewards in a self-control task. Animal Cognition, 16 (4), 627-36. Doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0599-x.

Pelé, M., Micheletta, J., Uhlrich, P., Thierry, B. & Dufour, V. (2011). Delay maintenance in Tonkean macaques and brown capuchin monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 32, 149–166. Doi: 10.1007/s10764010-9446-y

Putrino, N., Jakovcevic, A., Carpintero, S., D´Orazio, M. & Bentosela, M. (2014). ¿Existen asociaciones entre sociabilidad, aprendizaje y comunicación entre perros y personas? Revista de Psicología, 23 (1), xx-xx.

Rachlin, H.& Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 15–22.

Riemer, S., Mills, D. & Wright, H. (2013). Impulsive for life? The nature of long-term impulsivity in domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, 17 (3), 815-819. Doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0701-4

Roberts, W. (2002). Are animals stuck in time? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 473–489.

Rosati, A., Stevens, J., Hare, B. & Hauser, M. (2007). The evolutionary origins of human patience: temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Current Biology, 17, 1663-1668.

Scott, J. & Fuller,J. (1965).Genetics and the Social Behaviour of the Dog. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

Scott, J., Shepard, J. &Werboff, J. (1967). Inhibitory training in dogs: Effects of age at training in basenjis and Shetland sheepdogs. Journal of Psychology, 66, 237-252.

Shifferman, E. (2009). Its own reward: lessons to be drawn from the reversed-reward contingency paradigm. Animal Cognition 12, 547-558. Doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0215-2

Soubrié, P. (1986). Reconciling the role of central serotonin neurons in human and animal behavior. Behavioral Brain Science, 9, 319-64.

Spady, T. & Ostrander, E. (2008). Canine Behavioral Genetics: Pointing Out the Phenotypes and Herding up the Genes. Journal of Human Genetics, 82, 10–18.

Stafford, K. (2007). The Welfare of Dogs. Dordrecht: Springer.

Stahl, C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., Nuszbaum, M., Tüscher, O., Lieb, K. & Klauer, K. (2014). Behavioral Components of Impulsivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143 (2), 850–886.

Stevens, J. & Stephens, D. (2009). The adaptive nature of impulsivity. En Madden,G. &Bickel, W. (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 361-387). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Stevens, J. (2010). Intertemporal choice. EnBreed, M. &Moore, J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal behavior (cap 6).Oxford: Academic Press.

Stevens, J., Rosati, A., Heilbronner, S. &Mühlhoff, N. (2011). Waiting for Grapes: Expectancy and Delayed Gratification in Bonobos. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 99-111.

Tangney, J., Baumeister, R.& Boone, A. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.

Topál, J., Gergely, G., Erdohegyi, A., Csibra, G. &Miklosi, A. (2009).Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants. Science, 325 (5945), 1269-1272. Doi: 10.1126/science.1176960

Udell, M. & Wynne, C. (2010). Ontogeny and phylogeny: both are essential to human-sensitive behavior in the genus Canis. Animal Behavior, 79, e9-e14.

Van den Bergh, F., Spronk, M., Ferreira, L., Bloemarts, E., Groenink, L., Olivier, B. et al. (2006). Relationship of delay aversion and response inhibition to extinction learning, aggression, and sexual behaviour. Behavioral Brain Research, 175, 75–81.

Vas, J., Topál, J., Pách, E. & Miklósi, A. (2007). Measuring attention deficit and activity in dogs: A new application and validation of a human ADHD questionnaire. Applied Animal Behavioral Science, 103, 105-117.

Vick, S., Bovet, D. & Anderson, J. (2009). How do African grey parrots (Psittacuserithacus) perform on a delay of gratiﬁcationtask? Animal Cognition, 13, 351-358. Doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0284-2

Vlamings, P. (2006). Inhibition in great apes: Performance on a detour-reaching and reversed contingency task. Tesis de Maestría. Netherlands: University of Maastricht.

Wan, M., Hejjas, K., Ronai, Z., Elek, Z., Sasvari-Szekely, M., Champagne, F. et al. (2013). DRD4 and TH gene polymorphisms are associated with activity, impulsivity and inattention in Siberian Husky dogs. Animal Genetics, 44, 717–727. Doi: 10.1111/age.12058

Wright, H., Mills, D. & Pollux, P. (2011). Development and validation of a psychometric tool for assessing impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canisfamiliaris). International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 210–25.

Wright, H., Mills, D. & Pollux, P. (2012).Behavioural and physiological correlates of impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Physiology & Behavior, 105, 676–682.

Wright, L., Lipszyc, J., Dupuis, A., Thayapararajah, S. &Schachar, R. (2014). Response inhibition and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of go/no-go task performance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(2), 429-439. Doi: 10.1037/a0036295

Zaichenko, M. & Merzhanova, G. (2011). Studies of impulsivity in rats in conditions of choice between food reinforcements of different value. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 41, 445-451.

Estadísticas de consulta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas de publicación

2254 724

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.

Barra lateral del artículo

Contenido principal del artículo