Cautions measures in the arbitrar process: mandatory or optional?

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))

Issue: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2007)
Section Papers


Keywords: cautions measures arbitration natural justice enunciation requisite process effects unnamed

Main Article Content

Authors

Gabriel Angel Hernández-Villarreal
Universidad del Rosario

Abstract

Alternative methods, so-called, continue to take on greater strength in dispute resolution. They have taken on a preponderant role in the area of arbitration.

For this reason, the possibility that cautions measures could be decreed by arbitrators is a matter of particular interest. This article concerns itself with presenting the fundamentals of such cautions; what is the legal regime; what treatment must follow if international and national arbitrations. Finally, it looks at the conclusions that may be drawn in this matter, seeking to test the central thesis of the author, namely
that they conform to the Colombian juridical order. These means are merely stated'', and not required.

How to Cite
Hernández-Villarreal, G. A. (2010). Cautions measures in the arbitrar process: mandatory or optional?. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 9(1), 183–206. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/sociojuridicos/article/view/336
Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Publcation metrics

2044 468




 

The opinions included in the articles are of the authors alone, and under no circumstance do they represent the views of the Editorial Council or Universidad del Rosario. Reproduction of all or part of other articles is allowed as long as the source is cited. This magazine provides free immediate access to its contents under the principle that making research available to the public at no charge promotes sharing of global knowledge.