Relação entre inovação organizacional e desempenho organizacional

Barra lateral de artigos

PDF (Español (España))

Publicado: dic 31, 2012
Edição: v. 13 n. 21 (2011): (Julho-Dezembro)
Seção Artigos


Palavras-chave: inovação desempenho organizacional Organização desempenho de negócios.

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

Peter Yamakawa
Ph.D y M.Sc. en Ingeniería de la Universidad de Osaka (Japón)
Jhony Ostos
Ph.D en Management Science, Esade (España), y MBA, Universidad del Pacífico (Lima, Perú)

Resumo

Diversos escritos exploram a inovação organizacional e relacionam seu efeito no desempenho organizacional. No entanto, poucos estudos, por uma parte, tomam em conta a inovação técnica e a inovação administrativa como dimensões da inovação organizacional, e por outro lado, utilizam estas dimensões para analisar seu efeito no desempenho organizacional. Neste trabalho, os autores analisam a influência da inovação, incluindo as duas dimensões destacadas, sobre o desempenho organizacional. Adicionalmente, os autores examinam o comportamento das características organizacionais como variável moderadora desta relação. O estudo foi aplicado às empresas do setor serviços. Os resultados indicam que a inovação emgeral e a inovação técnica influem no desempenho organizacional, não assim a inovação administrativa, o qual reforça a idéia de que as empresas devem melhorar a baixa percepção daimportância da inovação administrativa para conseguir melhores desempenhos.
Biografia do Autor

Peter Yamakawa, Ph.D y M.Sc. en Ingeniería de la Universidad de Osaka (Japón)

Ph.D y M.Sc. en Ingeniería de la Universidad de Osaka (Japón) y magíster en Administración de la Universidad ESAN (Lima, Perú). Actualmente es vicerrector de Investigación y profesor del área de Operaciones y Tecnologías de Información de la Universidad ESAN.

Jhony Ostos, Ph.D en Management Science, Esade (España), y MBA, Universidad del Pacífico (Lima, Perú)

Ph.D en Management Science, Esade (España), y MBA, Universidad del Pacífico (Lima, Perú), con estudios de posgrado en Administración en University of California at Fullerton. Actualmente es profesor ordinario auxiliar de la Universidad ESAN. Correo electrónico:
Como Citar
Yamakawa, P., & Ostos, J. (2012). Relação entre inovação organizacional e desempenho organizacional. Revista Universidad Y Empresa, 13(21), 93–115. Recuperado de https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/empresa/article/view/1889
Referências

Baldwin, C., y Clark, K. (2000), Design rules: the power of modularity, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

Bolton, M. (1993), “Organizational innovation and substandart performance: when is necessity the mother of innovation?”. En: Organization Science, 4 (1): 57- 75.

Chamanski, A., y Waago, S. (2001), “Organizational performance of technology-based firms: the rol of technology and business strategy”. En: Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2 (3): 205-23.

Daft, R. (2004), Organization theory and design (8a . ed.). South Western.

Damanpour, F. (1996), “Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models”. En: Management Science, 42 (5): 693-16.

Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”. En: Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3): 555-90.

Damanpour, F., y Evan, W. (1984), “Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of ‘organizational lag’”. En: Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (3): 392-09.

Damanpour, F., et ál. (1989), “The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance”. En: Journal of Management Studies, 26 (6): 587-01.

Decanio, S., et ál. (2000), “The importance of organizational structure for the adoption of innovations”. En: Management Science, 46 (10): 1285-99.

Ethiraj, S., y Levinthal, D. (2004), “Modularity and innovation in complex systems”. En: Management Science, 50 (2): 159-73.

Fredrickson, J. (1986), “The strategic decision process and organizational structure”, Academy of Management Review, 11 (2): 280-97.

Galunic, K., y Eisenhardt, K. (2001), “Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms”, En: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6): 1229-49.

Gatignon, H., et ál. (2002), “A structural approach to assessing innovation: construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics”. En: Management Science, 48 (9): 1103-22.

Gibbons, D. (2004), “Network structure and innovation ambiguity effects on diffusion in dynamic organizational fields”, En: Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6): 938-51.

Gilbert, C. (2003), “The disruption opportunity”. En: MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (4): 27-32.

Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000), “Unravelling the links between dimensions of innovation and organizational performance”. En: The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11 (1): 137-53.

Han, J., et ál. (1998), “Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?”. En: Journal of Marketing, 62 (3): 30-45.

Henderson, R., y Clark, K. (1990), “Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms”. En: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 9-30.

Hill, C., y Rothaermel, F. (2003), “The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovative”, En: Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 257-74.

Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI) Perú. PEA 2008. Recuperado el 28 de octubre de 2009, de http://www. mintra.gob.pe/.

INEI Perú. Ingreso 2008. Recuperado el 28 de octubre de 2009, de http://www.mintra.gob.pe/.

INEI Perú. PBI 2008. Recuperado el 28 de octubre de 2009, de http://www.inei.gob.pe/.

Kimberly, J., y Evaniski, M. (1981), “Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and conceptual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations”. En: Academy of Management Journal, 24 (4): 689-13.

Klein, S., et ál. (2005, mayo), “The F-PEC scale of family influence: construction, validation, and further implication for theory”. En: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 321-39.

Koo, C., et ál. (2004), “An examination of Porter’s competitive strategies in electronic virtual markets: a comparison of two on-line business models”. En: International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9 (1): 163-80.

Langerak, F., et ál. (2004), “The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance”. En: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (2): 79-94.

Lee, J., y Miller, D. (1996), “Strategy, environment and performance in two technological contexts: contingency theory in Korea”. En: Organization Studies, 17 (5): 729-50.

Li, H., y Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001), “Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China”. En: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6): 1123-34.

Miller, D. (1991), “Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment”. En: Management Science, 17 (1): 34-52.

Miller, D. (1987), “Strategy making and structure: analysis and implications for performance”. En: Academy of Management Journal, 30 (1): 7-32.

Mintzberg, M. (1980), “Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design”. En: Management Science, 26 (3): 322-41.

Olson, E., et ál. (2005), “The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behaviour”. En: Journal of Marketing, 69 (3): 49-65.

Pil, F., y Cohen, S. (2006), “Modularity: implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage”. En: Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 995-11.

Quiles, M., et ál. (2006), “Variables moderadoras y mediadoras de la relación percepción de diferencias-ansiedad intergrupal”. En: Psicothema, 18 (1): 105-11.

Schilling, M., y Steensma, H. (2001), “The use of modular organization form: an industrylevel analysis”. En: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6): 1149-69.

Seaden, G., et ál. (2003), “Strategic decisions and innovation in construction”. En: Construction Management and Economics, 21, (6): 603-12.

Sheremata, W. (2004), “Competing through innovation in network markets: strategies for challengers”. En: Academy of Management Review, 29, (3): 359-77.

Tegarden, L., et ál. (2005), “The engagement of employees in the strategy and firm performance: the role of strategic goals and environment”. En: Journal of Business Strategies, 22 (2): 75-99.

Tidd, J. (2001), “Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance”. En: International Journal of Management Reviews, 3 (3): 169-83.

Tsai, W. (2001), “Knowledge transfer in intraorganizacional networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance”. En: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5): 996-04.

Tushman, M., y Nadler, D. (1986), “Organizing for innovation”. En: California Management Review, 28 (3): 74-92.

Van de Ven, A. (1986), “Central problems in the management of innovation”. En: Management Science, 32 (5): 590-07.

Walker, R., et ál. (2007), “Combinative effects of innovation types on performance: a longitudinal study of public services”. En: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1-6.

Wischnevsky, J., y Damanpour, F. (2006), “Organizational transformation and performance: an examination of three perspectives”. En: Journal of Management Studies, 23 (1): 104-28.

Zhou, K., et ál. (2005), “The effects of strategic orientations on technology –and market–based breakthrough innovations”. En: Journal of Marketing, 69 (2): 42-60.

Estatísticas de consulta

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Métricas de publicação

4404 2803