Main Article Content

Authors

This paper argues for a decolonization and provincializing of audience research. The tendencies within audience research reflect on one hand a dominant Anglo-Saxon discourse and use of concepts that emerge from particular Anglo-Saxon realities. On the other hand, studies from other regions, África and Latin America in particular, are presented and discussed in this paper, offering other insights, challenging what is articulated as myopia within audience studies, myopia both in the empirical focus, but in particular in the nature of the knowledge production emerging in contemporary audience studies. The paper seeks not just to celebrate and document diversity within global audience research. By drawing on Boaventura de Sousa Santos’ notions of epistemologies of the south and epistemology of blindness, and of seeing the paper argues for a sensitivity, breadth and nuance in knowledge production that can contribute to a truly global understanding of audiences in the digital era.
Tufte, T. (2017). Beyond Myopic Perspectives in Audience Research. Ethnographic Inquiries into Non-Western Audiences in the Digital Era: The Áfrican Case. Anuario Electrónico De Estudios En Comunicación Social "Disertaciones", 11(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/disertaciones/a.6275

Ang, I. (1996). Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world. London: Routledge.

Carpentier, N., Schrøder, K., & Hallet, L. (2014). Audience/Society transformation. In Carpentier, N., Schrø-

der, N. & Hallet, L. (Eds.), Audience transformations: Shifing audience positions in late modernity (pp. 1-12).

London: Routledge.

Couldry, N. (2006). Culture and citizenship: The missing link? European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3),

–39.

Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1996). Media events. The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

De Brujin, M., Brinkman, I. & Nyamnjoh, F. (2013). Side@Ways: Mobile margins and the dynamics of communication in Africa. Bamenda, Cameroon and Leiden, The Netherlands: Langaa & Áfrican Studies Centre.

Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. London: Methuen.

Ginsburg, F., Abu-Lughod, L., & Larkin, B. (2002). Media worlds: Anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley and

Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Helle Valle, J. et al., Project description. Www.mediafrica.no, 2014-2018. Visitado el 10 de agosto de 2017.

IFAD. (2011). Rural poverty report: 2011. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

ITU. (2015). Measuring the Information Society Report. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.

Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of

aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–79.

Moores, S. (2012). Media, place and mobility. London: Palgrave.

Morley, D. & Silverstone, R. (1990). Domestic communication: Technologies and meanings. Media, Culture

and Society, 12(1), 31-55.

Morley, S. (2007). Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new. London: Routledge.

Murphy, P. & Kraidy, M. (eds.) (2003). Global media studies. Ethnographic perspectives. London: Routledge.

Postill, J. (2014). Democracy in an age of viral reality: A media epidemiography of Spain’s indignados

movement. Ethnography, 15(1), 51-69.

Ridell, S. (2015). Exploring audience activities and their power-relatedness in the digitalized city: Diversity

and Routinisation of people’s media relations in the triply articulated urban space. En F. Zeller, C. Ponte &

B. O´Neill (eds.), Revitalising audience research, innovations in european audience research (pp. 236-260).

London: Routledge.

Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistimicide. Abington: Routledge.

Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Verso.

Tenhunen, S. (2013). Introduction: Mobile technology, gender and development. suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 32(1), 1-15.

Tufe, T. (1997). Televisión, modernidad y vida cotidiana. Un análisis de la obra de Roger Silverstone desde

contextos culturales diferentes. Comunicación y Sociedad, 31 (septiembre-diciembre), 65-96.

Tufe, T. (2000). Living with the Rubbish Queen. Telenovelas, culture and everyday life in Brazil. Luton: University of Luton Press.

Tufe, T. (2017). Communication and social change. A citizen perspective. Cambridge: Polity.

Vidali, D. S., & Tufe, T. (2014). Civic Mediations. Ethnography, 15(1), 5-11.

Willems, W. & Mano, W. (Eds.) (2017). Everyday media cultures in Africa. Audiences and users. London:

Routledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.