Validação da Escala Curta de Empatia (ECE) para a população mexicana

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.12026

Barra lateral de artigos

PDF (Español (España))

Publicado: jun. 14, 2023
Edição: v. 41 n. 2 (2023): Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana
Seção Artículos


Palavras-chave: Empathy , Prosocial behavior , Personality , Scale , Compassion Empatía , Conducta prosocial , Personalidad , Instrumento , Compasión Empatia , Conduta pró-social , Personalidade , Instrumento , Compaixão

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

  Paola Eunice Díaz Rivera Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  Christian Enrique Cruz Torres Universidad de Guanajuato
  Jaime Martín del Campo Ríos Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
  Juan José Duarte Barroso Universidad de Guanajuato
Resumo

Diaz Loving et al. (1986) desenharam a Escala de Empatia Multidimensional (ease), um instrumento culturalmente válido para a população mexicana inspirado na estrutura conceitual do Índice de Reatividade Interpessoal (iri) (Davis, 1980). Apresentamos evidências de validade e confiabilidade da escala curta de empatia (ece), uma versão breve do ease, aplicada a 674 participantes mexicanos (50,8% mulheres) (M = 22,8 anos, DP = 9,2). Além do iri, realizamos perguntas sobre comportamento pró-social e aplicamos o Inventário de Personalidade de 10 itens como critérios de validade externa. A análise fatorial exploratória mostrou três fatores (desconforto pessoal, tomada de perspectiva e compaixão) com níveis adequados de confiabilidade. A análise fatorial confirmatória verificou a estrutura com indicadores de qualidade de ajuste aceitáveis, obtendo evidências de equivalência estrutural para mulheres e homens. As relações dos três fatores da ece com pró-socialidade, personalidade e gênero fornecem critérios de validade externa para o instrumento.

Biografia do Autor

Christian Enrique Cruz Torres, Universidad de Guanajuato

Doctorado en Psicología. Integrante del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, Adscrito al departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Guanajuato Campus León como Profesor -Investigador de Tiempo completo

Como Citar
Díaz Rivera, P. E., Cruz Torres, C. E., Martín del Campo Ríos, J., & Duarte Barroso, J. J. (2023). Validação da Escala Curta de Empatia (ECE) para a população mexicana. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana , 41(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.12026
Referências

Abe, K., Niwa, M., Fujisaki, K., & Suzuki, Y. (2018). Associations between emotional intelligence, empathy and personality in Japanese medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1165-7

Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos (Versión 22.0) [Programa de cómputo]. SPSS. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171665

Baez, S., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., García, A. M., Cetkovich, M., & Ibáñez, A. (2017). Men, women… who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PloS one, 12(6), Article e0179336 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179336

Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). The science of evil: On empathy and the origins of cruelty. Basic books.

Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. En J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (pp. 3-15). MIT Press.

Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Cook, J., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers. Basic and applied social psychology, 27(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2701_2

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.

Caballo, V. E., Andrés, V., & Bas, F. (1997). Fobia social. Manual para el tratamiento cognitivo-conductual de los trastornos psicológicos, 1, 25-87. https://acortar.link/cfFKeJ

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Coke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(7), 752-766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.752

Costa, P., Magalhães, E., & Costa, M. J. (2013). A latent growth model suggests that empathy of medical students does not decline over time. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18, 509-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9390-z

Davidov, M., Paz, Y., Roth‐Hanania, R., Uzefovsky, F., Orlitsky, T., Mankuta, D., & Zahn‐Waxler, C. (2021). Caring babies: Concern for others in distress during infancy. Developmental Science, 24(2), Article e13016. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13016

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85), 1-19. https://www.uv.es/friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf

Davis, M. H. (1983). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00860.x

De Waal, F. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Three Rivers Press (Random House).

De Waal, F. B., & Preston, S. D. (2017). Mammalian empathy: Behavioral manifestations and neural basis. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(8), 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.72

Díaz-Loving, R., Andrade-Palos, P., & Nadelsticher-Mitrani, A. (1986). Desarrollo de la Escala Multidimensional de Empatía (EASE). Revista de Psicología Social y Personalidad, 2(1), 3-11.

Díaz-Loving, R., González-Varela, M., La Rosa, J., & Nina-Estrella, R. (1985). Empatía: antecedentes históricos y su relación con conductas prosociales y antisociales. Revista de Psicología Social y Personalidad, 1(2), 77-92.

Eisenberg, N. (1992). The caring child. Harvard University Press.

Eisenberg, N. (2003). Prosocial behavior, empathy, and sympathy. En M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, C. L. M. Keyes & K. A. Moore (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life course (pp. 253-265). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Schaller, M., Fabes, R. A., Fultz, J., Shell, R., & Shea, C. L. (1989). The role of sympathy and altruistic personality traits in helping: A reexamination. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00760.x

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1991). Prosocial behavior and empathy: A multimethod developmental perspective. En M. S. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 34-61). Sage Publications.

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. En W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701-778). John Wiley & Sons.

Escrivá, V. M., Navarro, M. D. F., & García, P. S. (2004). La medida de la empatía: análisis del Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Psicothema, 16(2), 255-260. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/ibc-32463

Fernández-Pinto, I., López-Pérez, B., & Márquez, M. (2008). Empatía: medidas, teorías y aplicaciones en revisión. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 24(2), 284-298. https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/42831

Ferrando, P. J., & Seva, U. L. (2017). 10 años del programa FACTOR: una revisión crítica de sus orígenes, desarrollo y líneas futuras. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-240. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304

Florenzano, R., & Guerrero, J. (2014). Personality disorders: From Schneider to DSM5. Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatría, 52(1), 38-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082014000300008

Froman, R. D., & Peloquin, S. M. (2001). Rethinking the use of the Hogan Empathy Scale: A critical psychometric analysis. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 55(5), 566-572. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.5.566

Furnham, A. (2008). Relationship among four Big Five measures of different length. Psychological Reports, 102(1), 312-316. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.102.1.312-316

Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002

Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069

Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807

Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Brüne, M. (2013). Towards a neuroscience of empathy: Ontogeny, phylogeny, brain mechanisms, context and psychopathology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(8), 1537-1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.001

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 820-835. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820

Guilera, T., Batalla, I., Forné, C., & Soler-González, J. (2019). Empathy and big five personality model in medical students and its relationship to gender and specialty preference: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1485-2

Hoffman, M. L. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. En M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 440-455). The Guilford Press.

Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027580

Iacoboni, M. (2009). Las neuronas espejo: empatía, neuropolítica, autismo, imitación, o de cómo entendemos a los otros. Katz Editores.

Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7(1), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x

JASP Team. (2022). JASP (Version 0.16.3) [Computer software]. Recuperado de https://jasp-stats.org

Keaton, S. A. (2017). Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1980). En D. L. Worthington & G. D. Bodie (Eds.), The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures (pp. 340-347). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119102991.ch34

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. The Guilford Press.

Lauterbach, O., & Hosser, D. (2007). Assessing empathy in prisoners. A shortened version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.66.2.91

Levine, R. V., Norenzayan, A., & Philbrick, K. (2001). Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32(5), 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005002

Lim, D., & DeSteno, D. (2016). Suffering and compassion: The links among adverse life experiences, empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior. Emotion, 16(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000144

Lockwood, P. L., Seara-Cardoso, A., & Viding, E. (2014). Emotion regulation moderates the association between empathy and prosocial behavior. PloS one, 9(5), Article e96555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096555

Löffler, C. S., & Greitemeyer, T. (2021). Are women the more empathetic gender? The effects of gender role expectations. Current Psychology, 42, 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01260-8

Lorenzo, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2021). MSA: The forgotten index for identifying inappropriate items before computing exploratory item factor analysis. Methodology, 17(4), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.7185

Martín del Campo-Ríos, J. M., & Cruz-Torres, C. E. (2020). Contextual violence and its link to social aggression: A study of community violence in Juárez. PeerJ, 8, Article e9162. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9162

Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x

Revilla, M., & Ochoa, C. (2017). Ideal and maximum length for a web survey. International Journal of Market Research, 59(5), 557-565. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2017-039

Segal, E. A., Gerdes, K. E., Mullins, J., Wagaman, M. A., & Androff, D. (2011). Social empathy attitudes: Do Latino students have more? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21(4), 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2011.566445

Sest, N., & March, E. (2017). Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 69-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.038

Song, Y., & Shi, M. (2017). Associations between empathy and big five personality traits among Chinese undergraduate medical students. PloS one, 12(2), Article e0171665.

Swickert, R. J., Rosentreter, C. J., Hittner, J. B., & Mushrush, J. E. (2002). Extraversion, social support processes, and stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(5), 877-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00093-9

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353

Verschuere, B., Van Ghesel Grothe, S., Waldorp, L., Watts, A. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., & Noordhof, A. (2018). What features of psychopathy might be central? A network analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in three large samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000315

Wright, M. F. (2013). The relationship between young adults' beliefs about anonymity and subsequent cyber aggression. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(12), 858-862. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0009

Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7

Estatísticas de consulta

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Métricas de publicação

461 562




 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Os autores conservam os direitos de autor e garantem à revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação do trabalho da mesma forma que licenciado sob uma Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a outros compartilhar o trabalho com um reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e a publicação inicial nesta revista. 

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.