Main Article Content

Authors

This article through the use of economic categories tries to identify the reasons that did not allow that former legislation (Law 333 1996) produced the result expected from the administration of seizure goods. This law pretended that this goods were not only productive, but also that they may generate employment. It is proposed in this article some remedies for the problems that were not solve by the new legislation (laws 785-793 2002) with the aim to establish the legal and institutional adjustments that permit that permit the fulfillment of the original objectives.
Restrepo-Medina, M. A. (2010). Expropiation and seizure goods as penalties for drug traffic. Economic analysis of the legal regime. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 5(2), 242–256. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/sociojuridicos/article/view/261

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.