Main Article Content

Authors

Introduction: in the literature there are studies that determine that 70 % to 80 % of the adult population at least once in their life has presented nonspecific lumbar pain, generating an impact on the social security system due to its high involvement in treatment costs, disabilities and labor absenteeism. Due to their cyclical behavior, about 90 % of the diagnoses are classified as nonspecific. However, there are no evaluative instruments that allow differential diagnoses and identify structural and functional deficiencies. The objective is to design an instrument that identifies structural and functional deficiencies in segmental instabilities of the lumbar spine. Materials and methods: This study was developed through five phases: literature review, a proposal of the examination tool, consensus of experts, pilot test and application to 17 workers in the general services sector. Results: The instrument had a subjective and an objective component. The results of the postero-anterior stability tests determined that 29% of the workers presented functional and structural deficiencies; the prone stability test was positive in 18 % of the cases, although they were asymptomatic in the subjective component. Conclusions: In ergonomics, it is important to consider worker evaluations that integrate the assessment of functional and structural deficiencies for preventive purposes of musculoskeletal disorders and functional rehabilitation.
Trillos, M. C., Tolosa-Guzmán I., & Perdomo, M. (2018). Clinical Evaluation of Lumbar Segmental Instability in Workers. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 16(Especial), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6847

Majid K, Truumees E. Epidemiology and Natural History of Low Back Pain. Semin in Spine Surg. 2008; 20(2): 87-92.

McGill S. Low Back Disorders Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation. Champaign (Illinois, Estados Unidos): Human Kinetics; 2002.

Panjabi MM, Lydon C, Vasavada A, Crisco JJ, Grab D, Dvorak J. On the Understanding of Clinical Instability. Spine. 1994; 19(23): 2642-50.

Bogduk N, Twomey LT. Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum. Tercera edición. Melbourne (Australia): Churchill Livingstone, 1987.

Demoulin C, Distrée V, Tomasella M, Crielaard JM, Vanderthommen M. Literature Review: Lumbar Functional Instability: A Critical Appraisal of the Literature. Ann Phis Rehabil Med. 2007; 50: 677-84.

Leone A, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Guglielmi G, Bonomo L. Degenerative Lumbar Intervertebral Instability: What is it and How Does Imaging Contribute? Skeletal Radiol, 2009; 38(6):529-33.

Tolosa I RZ, Mora M. Predicción clínica del dolor lumbar inespecí co. Rev Cienc Salud. 2012; (3): 347.

Panjabi MM. Clinical Spinal Instability and Low Back Pain. J Electromyogr Kinesio. 2003; 13: 371-9.

Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Segunda Edición. Filadel a (Pensilvania, Estados Unidos): Saunders; 2014.

Dutton M. Manual Therapy of the Spinean Integrated Approach. NuevaYork (Estados Unidos): McGraw-Hill Medical Pub Division; 2002.

Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, Mishock J. Interrater Reliability of Clinical Examination Measures for Identification of Lumbar Segmental Instability. Arch Physl Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1858-64.

Abbott JH, McCane B, Herbison P, Moginie G, Chapple C, Hogarty T. Lumbar Segmental Instability: A Criterion-Related Validity Study of Manual Therapy Assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005; 6: 56-10.

Donatelli RA, Wooden MJ. Orthopaedic Physical Therapy. Cuarta Edición. Washington (Estados Unidos): Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.

Constanza TM. Evaluación clínica de los desórdenes musculoesqueléticos en la columna lumbar: Bogotá (Colombia); Editorial Universidad del Rosario; 2012.

Intolo P, Milosavljevic S, Baxter DG, Carman AB, Pal P, Munn J. Systematic Review: The Effect of Age on Lumbar Range of Motion: A Systematic Review. Man Ther. 2009; 14: 596-604.

Cano-Gómez C, De La Rúa JR, García-Guerrero G, Juliá-Bueno J, Marante-Fuertes J. Physiopathology of Lumbar Spine Degeneration and Pain. Rev Esp Cir Traumatol. 2008; 52(1):37-46.

Meadows JTS. Diagnóstico diferencial en sioterapia: Madrid (España): Mc Graw Hill- Interamericana, 2000.

Kool J, Luomajoki H, de Bruin Eling D, Airaksinen O. Movement Control Tests of the Low Back; Evaluation of the Difference Between Patients with Low Back Pain and Healthy Controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 9(1): 170.

National Institute of Health Search Results [internet]. Clinical Guidelines on the Identi cation, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Obes Res. 1998; 6(6) 464. Disponible en https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9813653

Krivickas LS, Feinberg JH. Lower Extremity Injuries in College Athletes: Relation Between Ligamentous Laxity and Lower Extremity Muscle Tightness. Arch Physl Med Rehabil. 1996; 77(11): 1139-43.

Vanti C, Conti C, Faresin F, Ferrari S, Piccarreta R. Original Contribution: The Relationship Between Clinical Instability and Endurance Tests, Pain, and Disability in Nonspecific Low Back Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016; 39:359-68.

Denteneer L, De Hertogh W, Truijen S, Van Daele U, Stassijns G. Inter- and Intrarater Reliability of Clinical Tests Associated With Functional Lumbar Segmental Instability and Motor Control Impairment in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(1):151-64.

Vélez C PM, Miranda T, Franco I, Moreno Y, Riveros C. Implementación de ‘Escuela de espalda’ mediante la técnica de ‘Core’ en una fábrica de geotextiles para la prevención del dolor lumbar Rev Cienc Salud. 2011;(1):57.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.