Main Article Content

Authors

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the profile of patients treated at the Implantology clinic of the Integrated Schools of Adamantina-FAI, Adamantina-SP, Brazil, through analysis of medical records, appliance of questionnaire and execution of clinical examination. Material and methods: The sample universe of this study consisted of 96 medical records and 96 patients seen over the 9 years of FAI’s experience in the discipline of Implantology. The results were analyzed in the IBM SPSS StatisticsVersion 19 program and the Fisher’s exact and chi-square tests were also applied. Discussion / Results: It was observed that 53.97 % of the participants have lost their natural teeth due to caries. The type of implant prosthesis most used was the fixed denture (88 %). It is also important to note that almost all of the patients had no loss of implant, and these individuals were mostly aged less than or equal to 49 years for women (73.8 %) and greater than or equal to 50 years for men (61.8 %). In relation to the quantity of implant elements, the use of 2 implants or less was the most common rehabilitation for both sexes. Another important observation is that only 15.8 % of the participants have the habit of smoking. Conclusion: Thus, the profile of the treated patient at the Implantology clinic of FAI, is mostly women, healthy, aged less than 49 years old, non-smoking, which rehabilitated 1 or 2 teeth, with almost no incidence of implant lost and who opted for fixed denture supported by the implants.

Rodolfo Ferreira, J. P., Caetano Araújo, P., Adas Saliba, M. T., Adas Saliba Moimaz, S., & Adas Saliba Garbin, C. (2015). Profile of the Treated Patients at the Implantology Clinic of Integrated Schools of Adamantina (FAI). Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 13(02), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.12804/revsalud13.02.2015.07

Noia CF, Ortega-Lopes R, Moraes M de, Albergaria-Barbosa JR, Moreira RWF, Mazzonetto R. Complicacoes decorrentes do tratamento com implantes dentarios: analise retrospectiva de sete anos. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2010;64(2):146-9.

Al-Omiri M, Hantash RA, Al-Wahadni A. Satisfaction with dental implants: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2005;14(4):399-406.

Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100.

Sandor GK, Carmichael RP. Dental implants in children, adolescents, and young adults. Atlas OralMaxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2008;16(1):vii-viii.

Noia CF, Chaves Netto HDM, Ortega-Lopes R, Rodriguez-Chessa JG, Mazzonetto R. Uso de enxerto osseo autogeno nas reconstrucoes da cavidade bucal: analise restrospectiva de 07 anos. Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxillofac. 2009;50(4):221-5.

Mazzonetto R, Ortega-Lopes R, Noia CF, Chaves Netto HDM. Pesquisa basica em implantodontia. ImplatNews. 2010;7(3):83-92.

Moghadam M, Dias R, Kuyinu E, Ferguson MB, Mucciolo T, Jahangiri L. Predoctoral fixed implant patient satisfaction outcome and challenges of a clinical implant competency. J Dent Educ. 2012;76(4):437-42.

Hoogstraten J, Lamers LM. Patient satisfaction after insertion of an osseointegrated implant bridge. J Oral Rehabil. 1987;14(5):481-487.

Fonseca GM. Grau de satisfacao dos pacientes tratados com overdentures [monografia de especializacion]. [Rio de Janeiro]: Universidade do Grande Rio; 2004. 71 p.

De Grandmont P, Feine JS, Tache R, Boudrias P, Donohue WB, Tanguay R, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res. 1994;73(5):1096-104.

Boerrigter EM, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP, Bouma J, Raghoebar GM, van Waas MA, et al. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants-a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33(5):282-8.

Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(10):1167-73.

Humphris GM, Healey T, Howell RA, Cawood J. The psychological impact of implant-retained mandibular prostheses: a cross-sectional study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10(4):437-44.

Schmitt A, Zarb GA. The notion of implant-supported overdentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79(1):60-5.

Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(3):195-202.

Krennmair G, Ulm C. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(1):98-104.

Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van’t Hof MA, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures: a 5-years´ follow-up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(3):238-44.

Albrektsson T, Blomberg S, Branemark A, Carlsson GE. Edentulouness-an oral handicap. Patient reactions to treatment with jawbone-anchored prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 1987;14(6):503-11.

Wismeijer D, Van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Mulder J, Kalk W. Patient satisfacti on with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;26(4):263-7.

Leao MP; Granato R; Oderich E; Boff LL; Buttendorf AR; Bianchini MA. Avaliacao da satisfacao de pacientes reabilitados por implantes osseointegraveis. ImplantNews 2009;6(4):417-21.

Ortega-Lopes R, Noia CF, Andrade VC, Cidade CPV, Mazzonetto R. Perfil dos pacientes tratados com implantes dentarios: analise retrospectiva de sete anos. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2011;52(3):147-52.

Dini EL, Castelhano RA. Doencas periodontais em idosos: prevalencia e prevencao para populacao de 3a idade. Rev Bras Odontol. 1993;50(2):3-9.

Frare SM, Limas PA, Allarello FJ, Pedot G, Regio RAS. Terceira idade: quais os problemas bucais existentes? Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1997;51(6):573-6.

Padilha DMP, Baldssevolto J, Soll L, Bercht SMB, Petry PC. Odontogeriatria na universidade para nao perder tempo. Rev Fac Odont Porto Alegre. 1998;39(1):14-6.

Odontologia para 3a idade. Rev Odontol Bras. 1999;8(26):26-7.

Stabile GAV. Avaliacao retrospectiva de oito anos dos procedimentos implantodonticos associados ou nao a procedimentos reconstrutivos realizados na area de cirurgia buco-maxilo-facial da Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba [tesis de maestria]. [Piracicaba]: Unicamp/FOP; 2006. 134 p.

Rodriguez-Chessa JG. Tratamento de maxilas atroficas por meio de fixacoes zigomaticas. Analise retrospectiva de 03 anos [tesis doctoral]. [Piracicaba]: Unicamp/FOP; 2009. 56 p.

Herzberg R, Dolev E, Schwartz-Arad D. Implant marginal bone loss in maxillary sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(1):103-10.

Hiramatsu DA, Tomita NE, Franco LJ. Perda dentaria e a imagem do cirurgiao-dentista entre um grupo de idosos. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2007;12(4):1051-6.

Guimaraes MM, Marcos B. Perda de dente relacionada a razoes clinicas segundo a classe social. Rev do CROMG. 1995;1(2):54-61.

Moura WL, Eugenio MJE, Silva EF. Causas determinantes de exodontias na clinica cirurgica do curso de odontologia da Universidade Federal do Piaui. RASPP Rev Assoc Saude Pub Piaui. 1998;1(1):71-83.

Locker D. Patient-based assessment of the outcomes of implant therapy: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(5):453-61.

Stanford CM. Application of oral implants to the general dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(8):1092-100.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.