Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Test of Infant Motor Performance to Colombian Spanish

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.10146

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Published: Feb 11, 2022
Issue: Vol. 20 No. 1 (2022): Ciencias de la Salud
Section Clinical or Experimental Research


Keywords: infants newborns motor skills translation reliability of results

Main Article Content

Authors

Mónica Naranjo Ruiz
CITERM Research Group, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales (Colombia)
Inés Gabriela Guerrero Uchima
CITERM Research Group, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales (Colombia)
María Eugenia Serrano Gómez
Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia
Martha Lucía Acosta Otálora
Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia
Mónica Yamile Pinzón Bernal
Universidad Autónoma de Manizales (Colombia)
Luisa Matilde Salamanca Duque
Universidad Autónoma de Manizales (Colombia)

Abstract

Introduction: There has been growing interest in recent years in the cross-cultural adaptation of measuring instruments for various conditions treated by physiotherapy. Validation of an instrument within a target language and culture creates a final version that is conceptually and linguistically adapted to the context but remains valid and reliable. This paper describes the process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) from us English to Colombian Spanish. This was performed in accordance with international methodological guidelines. Materials and methods: A group of trained translators and field experts participated in the five stages presented herein. These stages were translation and adaptation of the instrument to Colombian Spanish, validation of its content and appearance, back-translation, revision by the original author, and, finally, a pilot test. Results: The existence of two intralingual translated and revised versions of this instrument led to a more appropriate preliminary version from conceptual, discursive, and terminological perspectives. Therefore, the adjustments made in the first stage were primarily semantic. During the second stage, field experts positively assessed the translated version and suggested adjustments to grammar, spelling, and word choices. There were no significant discursive problems during the back-translation stage
so conceptual and terminological adjustments were minor. The revision stage and the pilot test were
satisfactory. Conclusion: This translation and cross-cultural adaptation was successful. The Colombian
Spanish version of the measure was culturally relevant and used appropriate language, yet remained a valid and reliable tool.

How to Cite
Naranjo Ruiz, M., Guerrero Uchima, I. G. ., Serrano Gómez, M. E. ., Acosta Otálora, M. L. ., Pinzón Bernal, M. Y. ., & Salamanca Duque, L. M. . (2022). Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Test of Infant Motor Performance to Colombian Spanish. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.10146
References

Vericat A, Orden AB. Riesgo neurológico en el niño de mediano riesgo neonatal. Acta Pediátr Méx. 2017;38(4):255–66.

Ylijoki MK, Ekholm E, Ekblad M, Lehtonen L. Prenatal risk factors for adverse developmental outcome in preterm infants-systematic review. Front Psychol. 2019 26;10:595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00595

Stoinska B, Gadzinowski J. Neurological and developmental disabilities in ELBW and VLBW: follow-up at two years of age. J Perinatol. 2011;31(2):137–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.75

Lenke MC. Motor outcomes in premature infants. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2003;3(3):104–9.

Bélanger R, Mayer-Crittenden C, Minor-Corriveau M, Robillard M. Gross motor outcomes of children born prematurely in Northern Ontario and followed by a neonatal follow-up programme. Physiother Can. 2018;70(3):233–9. https://doi.rg/10.3138/ptc.2017-13

Campbell SK, Osten ET, Kolobe THA, Fisher AG. Development of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Medi Reha Cli of North Am. 1993;4(3):541-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30569-2

Campbell SK, Hedeker D. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome. J Pediatr. 2001;139(4):546–51. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.117581

Rose RU, Westcott SL. Responsiveness of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (timp) in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005;17(3):219–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pep.0000176575.63915.67

Campbell SK, The Test of Infant Motor Performance (timp). Test User’s Manual version. 2.0. Chicago: Infant Motor Performance Scales; 2005.

Byrne R, Noritz G, Maitre NL, NCH Early Developmental Group. Implementation of early diagnosis and intervention guidelines for cerebral palsy in a High-Risk Infant Follow-Up Clinic. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;76:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.08.002

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa. 1976) 2000;25(24):3186–91. htpps://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.

Escobar Bravo MÁ. Adaptación cross-cultural de instrumentos de medida relacionados con la salud. Enferm Clin. 2004;14(2):102–6.

Balluerka N, Gorostiaga A, Alonso-Arbiol I, Haranburu M. La adaptación de instrumentos de medida de unas culturas a otras: una perspectiva. Psicothema. 2007;19(1):124–33.

Muñiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK, International Test Commission. Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición. Psicothema. 2013;25(2):151–7.

Valdelamar-Jiménez J, Sánchez-Pedraza R. Traducción y adaptación cross-cultural de la escala Life Orientation Test – Revised para medir optimismo disposicional en cuidadores de pacientes con cáncer en Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Publ. 2017 May;35(2):2016–224. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v35n2a06

Garcimartin P, Pardo-Cladellas Y, Verdú-Rotellar JM, Delgado-Hito P, Astals-Vizcaino M, Comin-Colet J. Cross-cultural adaptation into Spanish of the Patient empowerment in long-term conditions questionnaire. Aten Primaria. 2019;51(1):24–31. htpps://doi. org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.009

Gaite L, Ramírez N, Herrera S, Velásquez JL. Traducción y adaptación transcultural de instrumentos de evaluación en Psiquiatría: Aspectos metodológicos. Arch Neurobiol. 1997;60(2):91–11.

Cabré Castellví MT. Theories of terminology. Terminol Int J Theor Appl Issues Spec Commun. 2003 Dec 31;9(2):163–99.

Echevarria Ulloa M. Adaptacion transcultural y version espanola de la prueba de rendimiento motor infantil (TIMP). [tesis doctoral].Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; (2017) Available from ttps://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/42956/

Campos De AC, Santos DCC, Rocha NACF. Children Y. Motor performance of children with Down syndrome and typical development at 2 to 4 and 26. Pediatr Phys Ther.2018;27(2):135–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000120

Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(4):254–66.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02025.x

Campbell SK, Kolobe THA. Concurrent validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance with Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2000;12(1):2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942630802224892

Coker-Bolt P, Woodbury ML, Perkel J, Moreau NG, Hope K, Brown T, et al. Identifying premature infants at high and low risk for motor delays using motor performance testing and MRS. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2014;7(3):219–32. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-140291

Campbell SK, Kolobe TH, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44(4):263–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162201002043

Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development [Measurement instrument]. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1969.

Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd ed) [Measurement instrument]. San Antonio, tx: The Psychological Corporation; 1993.

Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3.ª ed. San Antonio: Pearson; 2006.

Piper M, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1994.

Folio R, Fewell R. Peabody developmental motor scales and activity cards manual. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources; 1983.

Spittle OJ, Anderson P, Boyd R, Doyle L. Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants What’s new Dates Text of review Synopsis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1(11):1–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub2

Rana M, Upadhyay J, Rana A, Durgapal S, Jantwal A. A systematic review on etiology, epidemiology, and treatment of cerebral palsy. Int J Nutr Pharmacol Neurol Dis. 2017;7:76–83. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnpnd.ijnpnd_26_17

Einspieler C, Prechtl HF, Bos AF, Ferrari F, Cioni G. Prechtl’s Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term and Young Infants [ebook]. London: Mac Keith Press; 2008.

Dubowitz L, Ricciw D, Mercuri E. The Dubowitz neurological examination of the fullterm newborn. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(1):52-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20048

Barbosa VM, Campbell SK, Smith E, Berbaum M. Comparison of Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) item responses among children with cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and typical development. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59(4):446–56. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.59.4.446

Finkel RS, Hynan LS, Glanzman AM, Owens H, Nelson L, Cone SR, et al. The test of infant motor performance: Reliability in spinal muscular atrophy type i. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008;20(3):242–6.

Moriyama CH, Massetti T, Crocetta TB, Silva Da TDD, Mustacchi Z, Guarnieri R, et al. Systematic review of the main motor scales for clinical assessment of individuals with Down syndrome. Dev Neurorehabil. 2020;23(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2019.1687598

Campbell SK. Test–retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1999;11(2):60–6.

Chiquetti EMdos S, Valentini NC, Saccani R. Validation and reliability of the test of infant motor performance for Brazilian infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2020;0(0):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2020.1711843

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Publcation metrics

1076 280




 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Published articles are solely the authors’ responsibility and do not commit the Editorial Committee nor the Scientific Committee. The copyrights belong to the Revista Ciencias de la Salud, therefore, total or partial reproduction of the published material is forbidden, unless there is a previous authorization.

Most read articles by the same author(s)