La gestión del conocimiento en emprendimientos sociales: un análisis bibliométrico y cienciométrico de tendencias

Natalia Marulanda-Grisales; José Julián Herrera Pulgarín; María Lucelly Urrego Marín; Alma Leonora García Gómez

doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.11893

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

Gestão do conhecimento em empreendimentos sociais: uma análise bibliométrica e cienciométrica de tendências

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.11893

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España)) LinkedIn (Español (España))

Publicado: mai. 23, 2023

Edição: v. 24 n. 43 (2022)

Seção Artículo de revisión

Palavras-chave: empreendedorismo social gestão do conhecimento indicadores bibliométricos revisão de literatura

Autores

Natalia Marulanda-Grisales
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios

José Julián Herrera Pulgarín
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Uniminuto)

María Lucelly Urrego Marín
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Uniminuto)

Alma Leonora García Gómez
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Uniminuto)

Resumo

As tendências da gestão do conhecimento nas empresas sociais requerem uma revisão das formas de liderança nos territórios, de forma a caracterizar as competências e aptidões adequadas que dão origem a uma cultura organizacional que relacione o valor social com a solução eficaz das necessidades das comunidades. Portanto, o campo de pesquisa sobre empreendedorismo social encontra nos fatores organizacionais um horizonte de entendimento favorável. O objetivo do trabalho é avaliar o andamento da produção científica sobre gestão do conhecimento em relação a essas empresas híbridas, durante os anos de 1995 a 2021. Como metodologia, revisou-se as tendências de pesquisa, para o que se utilizou um estudo bibliométrico e cienciométrico, com uma amostra de 157 documentos recuperados da base de dados Scopus. Com base nas leis de Lotka, Pareto e Solla Price, foram desenvolvidos indicadores de quantidade, qualidade e história. Os resultados estabelecem como áreas de investigação futura: a articulação das ferramentas da Indústria 4.0 e 5.0, a integração global dos ecossistemas de empreendedorismo, o aumento da inclusão e diversidade, bem como o empoderamento e posicionamento no meio das várias comunidades identificadas como gestores de soluções para seus problemas particulares.

Biografia do Autor

José Julián Herrera Pulgarín, Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Uniminuto)

Seccional Antioquia-Chocó, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas

María Lucelly Urrego Marín, Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Uniminuto)

Seccional Antioquia-Chocó, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas

Alma Leonora García Gómez, Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios (Uniminuto)

Seccional Antioquia-Chocó, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales

Como Citar

Marulanda-Grisales, N., Herrera Pulgarín, J. J., Urrego Marín, M. L., & García Gómez, A. L. (2023). Gestão do conhecimento em empreendimentos sociais: uma análise bibliométrica e cienciométrica de tendências. Revista Universidad Y Empresa, 24(43), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.11893

Referências

Abreu, E. S. de, Kimura, H., & Sobreiro, V. A. (2019). What is going on with studies on banking efficiency? Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 195-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.07.010

Alonso Martínez, D., González Álvarez, N., & Nieto, M. (2015). Emprendimiento social versus innovación social. Cuadernos Aragoneses de Economía, 24(1-2), 119-140.

Araújo, N., Fraiz-Brea, J. A., Cardoso, L. A., & Matos, A. (2020). Scopus analysis of the academic research performed by public universities in Galicia and North of Portugal. Information Resources Management Journal (irmj), 33(1), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2020010102

Arciga-Alejandre, M. P., Sanchez-Ortiz, J., Ariza-Hernandez, F. J., & Catalan-Angeles, G. (2019). A multi-stage homotopy perturbation method for the fractional Lotka-Volterra model. Symmetry, 11(11), 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11111330

Ari, M. D., Iskander, J., Araujo, J., Casey, C., Kools, J., Chen, B., Swain, R., Kelly, M., & Popovic, T. (2020). A science impact framework to measure impact beyond journal metrics. plos one, 15(12), e0244407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244407

Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (bid), & Social Enterprice Knowledge Network (sekn). (2006). Gestión efectiva de emprendimientos sociales: lecciones extraídas de empresas y organizaciones de la sociedad civil en Iberoamérica. Planeta.

Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Sharma, G. D. (2019). Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: a systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041091

Benckendorff, P., & Shu, M. (2019). Research impact benchmarks for tourism, hospitality and events scholars in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 38, 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.04.005

Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019). Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 4719-4742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140

Bozhikin, I., Macke, J., & Da Costa, L. F. (2019). The role of government and key non-state actors in social entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 730-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.076

Building a values-driven data practice. (2019). Angaza. https://www.angaza.com/2019/09/12/ building-values-driven-data-practice/

Burghardt, K. J., Howlett, B. H., Fern, S. M., & Burghardt, P. R. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 nih-funded colleges of pharmacy using two databases. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(7), 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.10.006

Calvo Giraldo, O. (2018). La gestión del conocimiento en las organizaciones y las regiones: una revisión de la literatura. Tendencias, 19(1), 140-163. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.181901.91

Castro Laszlo, K., & Laszlo, A. (2002). Evolving knowledge for development: the role of knowledge management in a changing world. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(4), 400-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210440893

Cebrino, J., & Portero de la Cruz, S. (2020). A worldwide bibliometric analysis of published literature on workplace violence in healthcare personnel. PLoS one, 15(11), e0242781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242781

Ciambotti, G., Sgrò, F., Bontis, N., & Zaccone, M. C. (2021). Local relationships matter! The impact of intellectual capital on entrepreneurial bricolage in African social entrepreneurs. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(4), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1678

Corso, M., Martini, A., Pellegrini, L., & Pesoli, A. (2008). Emerging approach to E2.0: the case of social enterprise. First results from a 1-year field research. In M. D. Lytras, J. M. Carroll, E. Damiani, R. D. Tennyson, D. Avison, G. Vossen, & P. Ordonez de Pablos (Eds.), The open knowledge society. A computer science and information systems manifesto (pp. 92-100). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87783-7_12

Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., Chavan, G., & Shams, S. M. R. (2020). Social business enterprises as a research domain: a bibliometric analysis and research direction. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1861477

Cheung, C. F., Leung, C. S., Chu, K. F., & Lee, W. B. (2005). Case management in social service organizations: a knowledge management approach. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management (eckm) (pp. 649-656). Scopus.

De Solla Price, D. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505

Del Cerro, J. (2016). ¿Qué es el emprendimiento social? Negocios que cambian el mundo. Nueva Editorial Iztaccihualt.

Durán-Sánchez, A., Álvarez-García, J., González-Vázquez, E., & Del Río-Rama, M. de la C. (2020). Wastewater management: bibliometric analysis of scientific literature. Water, 12(11), 2963. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12112963

Fornacciari, P., Mordonini, M., Nonelli, M., Sani, L., & Tomaiuolo, M. (2017). Knowledge discovery on Scopus. University of Parma.

Friess, D. A., Yando, E. S., Wong, L.-W., & Bhatia, N. (2020). Indicators of scientific value: an under-recognised ecosystem service of coastal and marine habitats. Ecological Indicators, 113, 106255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106255

García, M. L. S., Adame, M. E. C., & Sáenz, M. E. V. (2020). Una aproximación a los conceptos de emprendedor y emprendimiento social. Revista Universidad y Empresa, 22(39).

Ghods, M. A. (2019). Entrepreneurial marketing: the missing link in social enterprise studies. Journal of Marketing Development & Competitiveness, 13(6), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0163-5

Godói-de-Sousa, E., & Machado, V. (2013). Social enterprises in Brazil: socially produced knowledge versus social innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000300015

Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: a review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 113, 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.032

Hallinger, P. (2021). A meta-synthesis of bibliometric reviews of research on managing for sustainability, 1982-2019. Sustainability, 13(6), 3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063469

Hernández-González, V., Sans-Rosell, N., Jové-Deltell, M. C., & Reverter-Masia, J. (2016). Comparación entre Web of Science y Scopus, estudio bibliométrico de las revistas de anatomía y morfología. International Journal of Morphology, 34(4), 1369-1377. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022016000400032

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Horng, J.-S., Liu, C.-H., Chou, S.-F., & Huang, Y.-C. (2020). The roles of university education in promoting students’ passion for learning, knowledge management and entrepreneurialism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.005

Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., & Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: a citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4

Huang, F., Gardner, S., & Moayer, S. (2016). Towards a framework for strategic knowledge management practice: integrating soft and hard systems for competitive advantage. vine Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(4), 492-507. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2015-0049

Jisha, A., & Selvaraju, R. (2020). Price square Root law, Pareto principle, and collaborations in Indian geese publication output: scientometric assessment. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4014

Jones, P., & Ratten, V. (2020). Knowledge spillovers and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1801363

Khiste, G. P., & Paithankar, R. R. (2017). Analysis of bibliometric term in Scopus. International Journal of Library Science and Information Management, 3(3), 81-88.

Kleiner, A., & Roth, G. (1997). How to make experience your company’s best teacher. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 172-177.

Kordab, M., Raudeliūnienė, J., & Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I. (2020). Mediating role of knowledge management in the relationship between organizational learning and sustainable organizational performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310061

Kumar, A., & Kushwaha, G. S. (2018). Humanitarian logistics: a review and cientometric analysis. Journal of Information Technology Research (jitr), 11(4), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2018100104.

Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: a cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x

Lacka, E., Chan, H. K., & Wang, X. (2020). Technological advancements and B2B international trade: a bibliometric analysis and review of industrial marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.007

Lam-Gordillo, O., Baring, R., & Dittmann, S. (2020). Ecosystem functioning and functional approaches on marine macrobenthic fauna: a research synthesis towards a global consensus. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106379

Lehoux, P., Pacifico Silva, H., Pozelli Sabio, R., & Roncarolo, F. (2018). The unexplored contribution of responsible innovation in health to sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 10(11), 4015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114015

Leydesdorf, L., & Opthof, T. (2018). Revisiting relative indicators and provisional truths. issi Newsletter, 14(3), 62-67.

Li, J., Lei, L., & Cheng, L. (2020). Mapping evaluation, appraisal and stance in discourse (2000-2015): a bibliometric analysis. Glottotheory, 10(1-2), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2019-0002

Lieberman, M. B., Balasubramanian, N., & Garcia‐Castro, R. (2018). Toward a dynamic notion of value creation and appropriation in firms: the concept and measurement of economic gain. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1546-1572. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2708

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323.

Lubberink, R., Blok, V., Ophem, J., Velde, G., & Omta, O. (2018) Innovation for society: towards a typology of developing innovations by social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 52-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2017.1410212

Martins, K., & Aveni, A. (2020). Impactos socio ambientais do emprendedor social. Revista Processus de Políticas Públicas e Desenvolvimento Social, 2(4), 57-73.

Merga, M. K., Mat Roni, S., & Mason, S. (2020). Should Google Scholar be used for benchmarking against the professoriate in education? Scientometrics, 125(3), 2505-2522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03691-3

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the Prisma statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Mok, W. J., Ghaffar, M. A., Noor, M. I. M., Lananan, F., & Azra, M. N. (2023). Understanding climate change and heavy metals in coastal areas: a macroanalysis assessment. Water, 15, 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050891

Ng’eno, B., Rogers, B., Mbori-Ngacha, D., Essajee, S., Hrapcak, S., & Modi, S. (2020). Understanding the uptake of prevention of mother-to-child transmission services among adolescent girls in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of literature. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 585-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1699124

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2005). The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth058

Oliveira, O. J. de, Silva, F. F. da, Juliani, F., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., & Nunhes, T. V. (2019). Bibliometric method for mapping the state-of-the-art and identifying research gaps and trends in literature: an essential instrument to support the development of scientific projects. In S. Kunosic & E. Zerem (Eds.), Scientometrics Recent Advances. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856

Phillips, W., Alexander, E. A., & Lee, H. (2019). Going it alone won’t work! The relational imperative for social innovation in social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 315-331.

Pimbert, M. P., & Pretty, J. N. (1995). Parks, people and professionals: putting ‘participation’ into protected area management. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

Pitolli, F. (2018). A fractional B-spline collocation method for the numerical solution of fractional predator-prey models. Fractal Fract., 2, 13.

Pitolli, F. (2019). A collocation method for the numerical solution of nonlinear fractional dynamical systems. Algorithms, 12, 156.

Ploum, L., Blok, V., Lans, T., & Omta, O. (2018). Toward a validated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship. Organization & Environment, 31(2), 113-132.

Prathap, G. (2019). The Pinski-Narin influence weight and the Ramanujacharyulu power-weakness ratio indicators revisited. Scientometrics, 119, 1173-1185. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uniminuto.edu/10.1007/s11192-019-03046-7

Ranabahu, N. (2020). “Wicked” solutions for “wicked” problems: responsible innovations in social enterprises for sustainable development. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(6), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2020.20

Ravi, K., & Sangeeta, D. (2021). A practical numerical approach to solve a fractional Lotka-Volterra population model with non-singular and singular kernels. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 145, 110792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110792

Ricardo, M. A. (2021). Knowledge management and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development in the United Nations context. Ciencias Administrativas, (17). https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e077

Ruiz Palomino, P., Linuesa Langreo, J., & Kelly, L. (2019). Hacia nuevos modelos empresariales más sociales y humanos: el papel de las mujeres en procesos de emprendimiento social y economía de comunión. Revista Empresa y Humanismo, 22(2), 87-122. https://hdl.handle.net/10171/57942

Sadabadi, A. A., Ramezani, A., & Fartash, K. (2022). Scientific mapping of social accounting using research indexed in scientific databases. J. Inf. Organ. Sci., 46(1). https://doi.org/10.31341/jios.46.1.2

Sage, A. P., & Small, C. T. (2000). Simulation perspective on knowledge management and sharing, and conflict and complexity in social systems management. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 536-541).

Sánchez, A., Quintero Soto, M. L., Sánchez Rosales, R., Fierro Moreno, E., & García Lirios, C. (2017). Gobernanza del emprendimiento social: especificación de un modelo para el estudio de la innovación local. Nómadas. Critical Journal of Social and Juridical Sciences, 51(2).

Santos, F. J., De la O Barroso, M., & Guzmán, C. (2020). La economía global y los emprendimientos sociales. Revista de Economía Mundial/Journal of World Economy, (35).

Scuotto, V., Le Loarne Lemaire, S., Magni, D., & Maalaoui, A. (2022). Extending knowledge-based view: future trends of corporate social entrepreneurship to fight the gig economy challenges. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1111-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.060

Schepis, D., Purchase, S., & Butler, B. (2021). Facilitating open innovation processes through network orchestration mechanisms. Industrial Marketing Management, 93, 270-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.01.015

Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., Calandra, D., & Biancone, P. (2020). Employing bibliometric analysis to identify suitable business models for electric cars. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121503

Shetty, M. V., & Shingi, P. M. (2009). Towards a heuristic model of social entrepreneurship development. In K. S. Soliman (Ed.), Creating global economies through innovation and knowledge management: theory & practice, Vols. 1-3 (pp. 104-114). Int Business Information Management Assoc-Ibima.

Siqueira, A. C. O., & Honig, B. (2019). Entrepreneurs’ ingenuity and self-imposed ethical constraints: creating sustainability-oriented new ventures and knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(10), 1965-1983. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2018-0707

Solano, S. E., Martínez Losa, N. A., & Casado, P. P. (2017). Emprendimiento social. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, (118), 69-81.

Solomon, G. T., Alabduljader, N., & Ramani, R. S. (2019). Knowledge management and social entrepreneurship education: lessons learned from an exploratory two-country study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(10), 1984-2006. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0738

Spiegler, A. B., & Halberstadt, J. (2018). Sustainability: how relationship networks influence the opportunity recognition process of female social entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 202-235.

Suciu, M. C., & Florea, C. A. (2015). km and open innovation: the expected evolution of innovation in the case of Romania. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 734-741).

Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2020). Evaluation of xml schema support in knowledge management. In Information modelling and knowledge bases XXXII (pp. 150-160). https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200826

Susanto, C., Al Habsy, T., Wilopo, & Abdillah, Y. (2021). The influence of social entrepreneurship on the organizational learning, partnership, competitive advantages, and business performance (a study of a creative industry-based small scale apparel business in dki Jakarta). Human Systems Management, 40(3), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-190751

Tomich, T. P., Lidder, P., Coley, M., Gollin, D., Meinzen-Dick, R., Webb, P., & Carberry, P. (2019). Food and agricultural innovation pathways for prosperity. Agricultural Systems, 172, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.002

Ullah, A., Wang, B., Sheng, J., Long, J., Khan, N., & Sun, Z. (2021). Identification of nodes influence based on global structure model in complex networks. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 6173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84684-x

Uribe-Toril, J., De Pablo, J., Ruiz-Real, J. L., & Pires Manso, J. R. (2019). Scientific literature on social entrepreneurship and its impact in the Ibero-American sphere [Literatura científica sobre emprendimiento social y su impacto en el ámbito iberoamericano]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 25(3), 10-29.

Valenzuela Fernández, L., Merigó, J. M., & Nicolas, C. (2017). Universidades influyentes en investigación sobre orientación al mercado: una visión general entre 1990 y 2014. Estudios Gerenciales, 33(144), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2017.07.001

Wichitsathian, S., & Nakruang, D. (2019). Knowledge integration capability and entrepreneurial orientation: case of Pakthongchai Silk Groups Residing. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 977.

Wynes, S., Donner, S. D., Tannason, S., & Nabors, N. (2019). Academic air travel has a limited influence on professional success. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 959-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.109

Xia, D.-M., Wang, X.-R., Zhou, P.-Y., Ou, T.-L., Su, L., & Xu, S.-G. (2021). Research progress of heat stroke during 1989-2019: a bibliometric analysis. Military Medical Research, 8(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-021-00300-z

Yang, Y., & Meng, G. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of comparative research on the evolution of international and Chinese ecological footprint research hotspots and frontiers since 2000. Ecological Indicators, 102, 650-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.031

Zou, X., Yue, W. L., & Vu, H. L. (2018). Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accid. Anal. Prev., 118, 131-145.

Żur, A. (2020). Entrepreneurial identity and social-business tensions: the experience of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 438-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1740297

Estatísticas de consulta