Basic article details

Title

Reviewer

Date

Article type

Mark with an X where applicable

Scientific and technological research article

Reflection paper

Review article

Other

Judgment (please indicate the applicable option)

Originality

The article contributes to constructing new concepts, redeveloping existing ones, and changing them in real-time business scenarios.

Interest

Is the article interesting?

Empirical foundation

Is this work fundamentally developed on the basis of field research?

Is this work fundamentally developed on the basis of a literature review?

Theoretical foundation

Is the literature broadly and sufficiently used?

Does the author include classical, basic, and latest works?

Methodological rigor

Is the research methodological design appropriate? 

Is it properly implemented and controlled?

Does the methodological design validate the results?

Readability

Is the text coherent?

Is its draft clear and direct?

Theoretical contribution

Does the text clarify, develop, put into context, or question the existing theory?

Does the text develop or propose a new theory?

Relevance of the results obtained

Does the text develop potential for impact in the advance of scientific, educational, or business activity?

Relevance of the figures and tables included

Does the article include tables, charts, or figures?

Do figures and tables clearly, rigorously, and accurately exemplify ideas, and are relevant data effectively addressed in the article?

Are these pertinent, synoptic, and clarifying?

Bibliographic references

Are bibliographic references comprehensive?

Do they follow the guidelines outlined in the sixth edition of the American Psychological Association’s Publication Manual?

Specific comments, requirements, concerns, and recommendations

Final decision (place an X in the appropriate box)

Approved

Approved with modifications

Rejected