• Alburquerque, F. (1999). Cambio estructural, desarrollo económico y reforma de la gestión pública. Manual del agente de desarrollo local, Ediciones Sur, Santiago de Chile. 129 p.
• Antonelli, C. (2000). Collective knowledge communication and innovation: the evidence of technological districts. Regional Studies, 34, 535–547.
• Antonelli,C. (1995). The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics. Kluwer. Dordrecht. 183 p.
• Becker W, Dietz J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33,209–23.
• Bodas Freitas,I., Argou Marques, R, Mirra de Paula e Silva, E. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42, 443–453.
• Boisier, S. (1995). La Mesoeconomía Territorial: interacción entre personas e instituciones. Notas para orientar a los gobiernos regionales, Documento 95/26, Serie Ensayos, ILPES. 20 p.
• Boschma, R. & Lambooy, J. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9, 411–429.
• Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Regional Studies. 38, 1001–1014.
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
• Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation Networks: spatial perspectives. Belhaven Press, Londres y New York. 1-9 p
• CEPAL-FAO-IICA. (2010). Perspectivas de la agricultura y del desarrollo rural en las Américas: una mirada hacia América Latina y el Caribe, Santiago de Chile. 164 p.
• Chung, J. (2014). An analysis of the status of the Triple Helix and university–industry–government relationships in Asia. Scientometrics, 99, 139–149.
• Corder, G., Foreman, D. (2011). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: a step-by-step approach. Wiley-Blackwell. 243-244 p.
• Edwards, M. and Shultz, C. (2005). Reframing Agribusiness: Moving from Farm to Market Centric. Journal of Agribusiness. 23, 57-73.
• Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry– government relations. Research Policy. 29, 109–23.
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix University –Industry - Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review. 14, 14-19.
• Fiaz, M. (2013). An empirical study of university–industry R&D collaboration in China: Implications for technology in society. Technology in Society, 35, 191–202.
• Freeman, C. eds. (1987). Technical Change And Full Employment. Blackwell. Oxford and New York, 49-69.
• Fritsch M, Lukas R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy. 30,297–312.
• Fujita, M. y Krugman, P. (2007). La nueva economía geográfica presente pasado y futuro. Investigaciones Regionales. 4, 177-206.
• Geldes, C., Felzeinsztein, C., Turkina, E. y Durand, A. (2015). How does proximities affect interfirm marketing cooperation in cluster? A study of agribusiness in latin-american emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 263-272.
• Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations' performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 119, 294–309.
• George, V., Farris, G. (1999). Performance of Alliances: Formative Stages and Changing Organizational and Environmental Influences. R & D Management, 29 (4), 379-389.
• Gilly, J. and Torre, A. (2000). Proximity relations. Elements for an analytical framework, in Green, M. and McNaughton, R. (Eds) Industrial Networks and Proximity. Ashgate, Aldershot. 1–16 p.
• Giuliani, E., Andrea Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., Rabellotti, R. (2010). Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy, 39, 748–761.
• Gomes-Caseres, B. (1997). The Alliance Revolution. The New Shape of Business Rivalry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 320 p.
• Hong, W.; Sung, Y. (2013). The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations: an analysis based on Chinese patent data. Research Policy, 42(2), 454-464.
• Howells, J. 2002. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39, 871–884.
• Jeung, S., Ha Ngo, T. (2012). Riccardo Viale and Henry Etzkowitz (eds): The capitalization of knowledge: a triple hélix of university-industry-government High Educ, 63,161–163.
• Knoben, J. and Oerlemans, L. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89.
• Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W., Van der Panne, G. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple – helis relations among technology, organization. and territory. Research Policy, 35(2), 181-199.
• Lopes, C; Baptista, R; Cardoso, C. (2012). The proximity between Academy, Industry and Government: towards a more sustainable development of a Brazilian oil región. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 100–109.
• López A. (2008). Determinants of R&D cooperation: evidence form Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 113–36.
• López Leyva, S. (2005). La Vinculación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología con el Sector Productivo: Una perspectiva económica y social. 2da. Edición corregida y aumentada. Editorial Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa. México. 526 p.
• Lundvall, B. (1997). National Systems and National Styles of Innovation. Fourth International ASEAT Conference. Differences in styles. Manchester. September 2-4.
• Malaver, F. y Vargas, M. (2004). Hacia una caracterización de los procesos de innovación en la industria colombiana. Los resultados de un estudio de caso. Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 33, 5-33.
• Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A. (1999). The competitiveness of firms and regions. ‘Ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies. 6: 9–25.
• Montoro-Sanchez, A., Mora-Valentin, E., Guerras-Martin,L. (2006). R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. A comparative analysis of the characteristics and reasons depending on the nature of the partner. International Journal of Technology Management, 35(1–4), 156–81.
• MSCI. (2012). Índice de mercados emergentes. http://www.msci.com/products/indices/country_and_regional/em/
• (Fecha de consulta 08/06/2017).
• Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 263 p.
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 95 p.
• ODEPA. (2016). Región de Coquimbo, Información Regional 2016. http://www.odepa.cl/wp-content/files_mf/1462200523Coquimbomarzo.pdf (Fecha de consulta 07/06/2017)
• Papagiannidis, S., Li, F., Etzkowitz, H. (2009). Michael Clouser Entrepreneurial networks: A Triple Helix approach for brokering human and social capital. J Int Entrep. 7, 215–235.
• Perdana, T. (2012). The Triple Helix Model for Fruits and Vegetables Supply Chain Management Development Involving Small Farmers in Order to Fulfill the Global Market Demand: a Case Study in Value Chain Center (VCC) Universitas Padjadjaran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 52, 80-89.
• Porter, M. (1998). Cluster and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, November – December, 77-90.
• Porter, M.; Fuller, M. (1988). Coaliciones y Estrategia Global. Información Comercial Española, 658(4), 101-120.
• Rosenkopf, L. and Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766.
• Sábato, J. y Botana, N. (1968). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la Integración, 1(3), 15-36.
• Santos Martín, J., Del Olmo Martínez, R., Pajares Gutiérrez, J. (2005). Fenómenos de difusión de conocimiento y dimensión geográfica de la innovación, una aproximación multi-agente. IX Congreso de Ingeniería de Organización. Gijón 8-9. 121 p.
• Shinn, T. (2002). The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599-614.
• Walpole, R. (1999). Probabilidad y estadística para ingenieros. Sexta Edición, Pretice Hall, Hispanoamericana S.A. Impreso Mexico. 223 p.
• Wen-Hsiang. L. (2011). Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 64, 1218.
