Main Article Content

Authors

The strategic equilibrium of an N-person cooperative game with transferable utility is a system composed of a cover collection of subsets of N and a set of extended imputations attainable through such equilibrium cover. The system describes a state of coalitional bargaining stability where every player has a bargaining alternative against any other player to support his corresponding equilibrium claim. Any coalition in the sable system may form and divide the characteristic value function of the coalition as prescribed by the equilibrium payoffs. If syndicates are allowed to form, a formed coalition may become a syndicate using the equilibrium payoffs as disagreement values in bargaining for a part of the complementary coalition incremental value to the grand coalition when formed. The emergent well known-constant sum derived game in partition function is described in terms of parameters that result from incumbent binding agreements. The strategic-equilibrium corresponding to the derived game gives an equal value claim to all players.  This surprising result is alternatively explained in terms of strategic-equilibrium based possible outcomes by a sequence of bargaining stages that when the binding agreements are in the right sequential order, von Neumann and Morgenstern (vN-M) non-discriminatory solutions emerge. In these solutions a preferred branch by a sufficient number of players is identified: the weaker players syndicate against the stronger player. This condition is referred to as the stronger player paradox.  A strategic alternative available to the stronger players to overcome the anticipated not desirable results is to voluntarily lower his bargaining equilibrium claim. In doing the original strategic equilibrium is modified and vN-M discriminatory solutions may occur, but also a different stronger player may emerge that has eventually will have to lower his equilibrium claim. A sequence of such measures converges to the equal opportunity for all vN-M solution anticipated by the strategic equilibrium of partition function derived game.    [298-words]

Turbay, G. J. (2011). A Strategic-Equilibrium Based. Revista Universidad Y Empresa, 12(19), 54–86. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/empresa/article/view/1307

Harsanyi, J. C. (1959) “ A bargaining model for the cooperative n-person game” in Luce R.D. and A.W. Tucker (eds.) Contributions to the theory of Games, IV (Annals of Mathematics Studies, 28) Princeton, N.Y.

Luce, R.D. and H. Raiffa (1957), Games and Decisions John Wiley & Sons, New York

Thrall R.M. and W.F. Lucas(1963) “N-person games in partition function form” Naval Research logistics Quarterly” ,10 ,281-298.

Turbay G.J. (2007) “Eigen-behaviors in closed economies” Working paper, Facultad de Administracion , UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO, Bogota, Colombia

Turbay G.J. (2009) “Strategic-equilibrium for n-person cooperative games.” Working paper to be presented July12-16, 2010 at the 21st Game theory International Conference. Honoring Robert J. Aumann , Stony Brook, N.Y..

Turbay G.J. (2010) “The Stronger Player Paradox” working paper to be presented at the First Brazilian Game Theory Conference, Honoring John F. Nash. July 29-August 4.

Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern (1967), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 3rd Ed., Princeton University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.