Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42, 408-422.
Acs, Z., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ., 32(1), 15-30.
Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer
from mit. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
Almeida, M., Terra, B., & Pérez, M. (2011). The incubator movement: a comparative analysis of
Brazil and Mexico. In M. Saad & G. Zawdie (Eds.), Theory and practice of the triple helix system in developing countries: issues and challenges. Oxford: Routledge.
Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2019). Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: a bibliometric review. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25, 105-113.
Arundel, A., & Bordoy, C. (2008). Developing internationally comparable indicators for the commercialization of publicly-funded research. unu-merit.
Bell, E. (1993). Some current issues in technology transfer and academic-industrial relations:
a review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5(3), 307-321.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the
individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.
Brandao, B., & Rücker, P. (2019). Universities institutional settings and academic entrepreneurship: notes from a developing country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 243-252.
Brouwer, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university licensing. Journal of Technology Transfer,
(3), 263-270.
Bubela, T. M., & Caulfield, T. (2010). Role and reality: technology transfer at Canadian universities. Trends in Biotechnology, 28, 447-451.
Calderón Martínez, M. (2017). Tercera misión de la universidad. Una revisión de la literatura
sobre emprendimiento académico. VinculaTegica, 3(1), 364-373.
Cantu-Ortiz, F., Galeano, N., Mora-Castro, P, & Fangmeyer, J. (2017). Spreading academic entrepreneurship: made in Mexico. Business Horizons, 60(4), 541-550.
Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research
Policy, 38, 936-946.
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, N. (2005). Assessing the relative performance
of university ttos in the uk. Research Policy, 34, 369-384.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting
from technology. Boston, ma: Harvard Business School Press.
Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267-281.
Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Surrey: iau Press.
Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: new foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13(2), 17-23.
Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case
of a research-based spin-off. J. Bus. Ventur., 19(1), 55-79.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183-216.
W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the uk: what are the factors underlying I have the variety of interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36, 1295-1313.
Dagnino, R., Thomas, H., & Davyt, A. (2000). Vinculacionismo/neovinculacionismo. Racionalidad de la interacción universidad-sector productivo en América Latina (1955 1995). En R. Casas & G. Valenti (Coords.), Dos ejes de la vinculación de las universidades a la producción. La formación de recursos humanos y las capacidades de producción (pp. 25-48). México: Plaza y Valdés Editores-Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, unam/uam.
Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., Blois, G. V. (2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 99-111.
Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfers organizations
in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321-342.
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.
Ding, W., & Choi, E. (2001). Divergent paths to commercial science: a comparison of scientists’
founding and advising activities. Research Policy, 40, 69-80.
Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinout from academic institutions: literature review with suggestions for further research. Journal Technologic Transfer, 33, 225-247.
Dutrenit, G., De Fuentes, C., & Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organizations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico. Science and
Public Policy, 37(7), 513-526.
El-Katany, M., & Awny, M. (2016). Universities third mission activities: case study from Egypt.
iamot, 25th Conference Proceedings.
Engel, J. S., & Del-Palacio, I. (2011). Global clusters of innovation: the case of Israel and Silicon Valley. Calif. Manag. Rev., 53(2), 27-49.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: the entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge
firmament. Technological Forescasting & Social Change, 123, 122-129.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.
Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
Etzkowitz, H., Germain-Alamartine, E., Keel, J., Kumar, C., Nelson, K., & Albats, E. (2019). Entrepreneurial university dynamics: structured ambivalence, relative deprivation and institution-formation in the Stanford innovation system. Technological Forecasting & Social
Change, 141, 159-171.
European Commission (ec). (2001). Building an innovative economy in Europe: a review of 12 studies of innovation policy and practice in today’s Europe. eur 17043.
Fellnhofer, K. (2019). Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: a biliometric mapping and visualization. Educational Research Review, 27, 28-55.
Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the ip system? Business creation in
academia. Research Policy, 39, 1060-1069.
Fini, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities
and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40, 1113-1127.
Forliano, C., De Bernardim, P., & Yahiaoui, D. (2021). Entrepreneurial universities: a bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains. Technological orecasting & Social Change, 165, 1-16.
Franklin, S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. J. Technol. Transf., 26(1-2), 127-141.
Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
Fuster, E., Padilla-Meléndez, A., Lockett, N., & Del-Águila-Obra, A. (2019). The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: the case of Andalusia. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 219, 219-231.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1998). The new production of knowledge, the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: sage.
Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639.
Graham, R. (2014). Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from emerging world leaders. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small business Economics, 21(4), 329-341.
Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). ‘Academics’ organizational characteristics and the generation
of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821-845.
Grigg, T. (1994). Adopting an entrepreneurial approach in universities. Journal of Engineering
and Technology Management, 11(3-4), 273-298.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Gajòn, E. (2014). Innovative pathways for university entrepreneurship in the 21th century advances in the study of entrepreneurship. Innovation and Economic Growth, 24, 89-118.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research
performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950.
Harmon, B., Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, R., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., et al. (1997). Mapping
the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6), 423-434.
Hayter, C. S. (2013). Harnessing university entrepreneurship for economic growth factors of
success among university spin-offs. Econ. Dev. Q., 27(1), 18-28.
Hernández-Mondragón, A., Herrera-Estrella, L., & Kuriharcuch, W. (2016). Legislative environment and other factors that inhibit transfer of Mexican publicly funded research into
commercial ventures. Technology in Society, 46, 100-108.
Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., & Hamilton, K. (2001). The changing composition of innovative activity in the us. A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30(4), 681.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (hefce). (2006). Higher education-business
and community interaction survey, 2003-04. Available from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2006/06_25/
Hsu, D. H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture
capital funding. Research Policy, 36(5), 722-741.
Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy,
(9), 1555-1568.
Jensen, R. A., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240-259.
Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university
invention ownership model. Res. Policy, 38, 1407-1422.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Res. Policy, 40(10), 1354-1368.
Laukkanen, M. (2003). Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university-based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4), 372-382.
Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: an empirical
assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). U.S. science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects
on the academic mission of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323-1356.
Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities spinout strategies. Small Business Economics, 20, 185-200.
López, T., & Álvarez, C. (2018). Entrepreneurship research in Latin America: a literature review.
Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 31(4), 736-756.
Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-131.
Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical
findings. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 773-776.
Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P.H., & Balkin, D. B. (2004). Entrepreneurship from the Ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4), 353-364.
Mazzucato, M. (2014). El Estado emprendedor. Barcelona: rba Libros.
Molas-Gallart, J., et al. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. United Kingdom: spru.
Molas-Gallart, J., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2007). Ambiguity and conflict in the development of
‘Third Mission’ indicators. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321-330.
Moray, N., & Clarysse, B. (2005). Institutional change and resource endowments to science-
based entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 34(7), 1010-1027.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial
innovation. University-industry technology transfers before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. California: Stanford University Press.
Ndonzuau, N., Pirnay, N., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation.
Technovation, 22(5), 281-289.
Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. D. (2009). Opportunity recognition and the
tendency to be an entrepreneur: a bivariate genetics perspective. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 108-117.
Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., Hunkin, J., & Spector, T. D. (2008). Is the tendency to
engage in entrepreneurship genetic? Management Science, 54(1), 167.
Nicolau, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts phenomenon. Management Science, 49(12), 1702-1726.
O’Shea, R., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff
activity: a conceptual framework. J. Technol. Transf., 33(6), 653-666.
Oliver, L. A. (2004). Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations. Research
Policy, 33(4), 583.
Osca-Lluch, J., Miguel, S., González, C., Peñaranda-Ortega, M., & Quiñones-Vidal, E. (2013). Cobertura y solapamiento de Web of Science y Scopus en el análisis de la actividad científica
española en psicología. Anal. Psicol., 29(3).
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional
success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 99-114.
Pérez, M., & Ávila, I. (2015). Propuesta de indicadores de la comercialización de tecnología
universitaria en México. En Congreso Ricyt 2015.
Pérez, M., & Calderón, M. (2019). Avances normativos en la creación de empresas spin off
universitarias en México. Entreciencias, 7(20), 53-64.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic
engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university-industry relations.
Res. Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161-170. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003
Politis, D., Gabrielsson, J., & Shveykina, O. (2012). Early-stage finance and the role of external
entrepreneurs in the commercialization of university-generated knowledge. Ventur. Capital, 14(2-3), 175-198.
Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing
with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291-311.
Rasmussen, E. (2011). Book review: entrepreneurship education. International Small Business
Journal, 29(6), 731-733.
Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An
entrepreneurial competency perspective. J. Technol. Transf., 40(5), 782-799.
Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the
evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Res. Policy, 43(1), 92-106.
Ricyt. (2017). Manual de Valencia: propuesta de indicadores de vinculación de la universidad
con el entorno socioeconómico. Ricyt-oei.
Ricyt. (2019). Estado de la ciencia. Ricyt. Roberts, E. B., & Peters, D. H. (1981). Commercial innovation from university faculty. Research Policy, 10(2), 108-126.
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy
of the literature. Ind. Corp. Change, 16(4), 691-791.
Sánchez, A., Ortiz Guzmán, A., Pérez, M., Rivera, I., & Pérez, S. (2019). Mecanismos de transferencia de tecnología como elementos de fortalecimiento del conocimiento acumulado en la industria biofarmacéutica mexicana: el caso de la udibi-ipn. Nova Scientia, 22(11), 246-273.
Saragossi, S., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003). What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 47-51.
Schmitz, A., Urbano, D., Aparecida, G., Artur, J., & Guerrero, M. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the case setting: a systematic literature review. International Entrepreneur Managment Journal, 13, 369-395.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research.
Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
Shane, S. (2002). University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of
Business Venturing, 17(6), 537-552.
Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, uk-Northampton, ma, usa: Edward Elgar.
Siegel, D. (2006). Technological entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? Br. J. Manag.,
(4), 582-595.
Siegel, D., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices
on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study.
Res. Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Singh, A., Wong, P., & Ho, Y. (2015). The role of universities in the national innovation systems
of China and East Asian niess: an exploratory analysis of publications and patenting data.
Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(2), 140-156.
Smilor, R., Dietrich, G., & Gibson, D. (1993). The entrepreneurial university: the role of higher
education in the United States in technology commercialisation and economic development.
Cambridge, ma, usa: unesco.
Solleiro, J. L., & López, R. E. (1993). La experiencia reciente de vinculación universidad-empresa
en México. En G. A. Plonsky (Ed.), Cooperación empresa-universidad en Iberoamérica (pp. 137-160). Sao Paulo: cyted.
Somaya, D., Teece, D., & Wakeman, S. (2011). Innovation in multi-invention contexts: mapping
solutions to technological and intellectual property complexity. Calif. Manag. Rev., 53(4), 47-79.
Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal
of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144.
Sutz, J. (2000). The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy,
(2), 279-290.
Svensson, P., Klofsten, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). An entrepreneurial university strategy for renewing a declining industrial city: the Norrköping way. Eur. Plan. Stud., 20(4), 505-525.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
Thorn, K., & Soo, M. (2006). Latin American universities and the third mission: trends, challenges and policy options. World Bank Policy Research. Working Paper 4002.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the Ivory tower? Sources of growth in
university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90-104.
Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual
property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109-124.
unico. (2005). uk university commercialisation survey: financial year 2004.Cambridge: Experian.
Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-441.
Villavicencio, D. (2017). Las vicisitudes de la innovación en biotecnología y nanotecnología
en México. México: Editorial Itaca-Conacyt.
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university
high-tech spinout companies. Res. Policy, 33(1), 147-175.
Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pilar Pérez-Hernández
