Hacia una taxonomía de la literatura del emprendimiento académico: aportaciones para Latinoamérica

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.8946

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF HTML Lector Inteligente ePub

Publicado: ene. 12, 2022
Número: Vol. 23 Núm. 41 (2021)
Sección Artículo de revisión


Palabras clave: Emprendimiento académico taxonomía de la literatura aportes para Latinoamérica

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

  Pilar Pérez-Hernández
Instituto Politécnico Nacional (México)

Resumen

La emergencia del conocimiento como motor del crecimiento sitúa al emprendimiento académico como punto catalizador del desarrollo tecnológico y económico; por ello, ha recibido creciente interés tanto de políticos como de gestores universitarios y académicos. Aunque el auge de la literatura del emprendimiento académico se propagó a partir de la década de los noventa, los objetos y dinámicas del trabajo académico han cambiado. Este estudio realiza una taxonomía de la literatura sobre emprendimiento académico para identificar tendencias, vacíos y áreas de oportunidad para Latinoamérica. La metodología seguida hizo un análisis sistemático de literatura basado en la producción regional. Los resultados apuntan a que la literatura se ha centrado predominantemente en los cambios de la universidad y el tránsito a la universidad emprendedora, la comercialización de tecnología universitaria y factores sociales. Empero, deja de lado los atributos individuales de los académicos que emprenden, el sistema de incentivos y la identificación de oportunidades de estos. Esta revisión permite identificar áreas de oportunidad por explorar en la práctica e investigación en Latinoamérica.

Biografía del autor/a

Pilar Pérez-Hernández, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (México)

Profesora titular de la Maestría en Política y Gestión del Cambio Tecnológico del Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Administrativas y Sociales, Instituto Politécnico Nacional-CIECAS.

Cómo citar
Pérez-Hernández, P. (2022). Hacia una taxonomía de la literatura del emprendimiento académico: aportaciones para Latinoamérica. Revista Universidad Y Empresa, 23(41). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.8946
Referencias bibliográfica

Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42, 408-422.

Acs, Z., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ., 32(1), 15-30.

Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer

from mit. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.

Almeida, M., Terra, B., & Pérez, M. (2011). The incubator movement: a comparative analysis of

Brazil and Mexico. In M. Saad & G. Zawdie (Eds.), Theory and practice of the triple helix system in developing countries: issues and challenges. Oxford: Routledge.

Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2019). Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: a bibliometric review. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25, 105-113.

Arundel, A., & Bordoy, C. (2008). Developing internationally comparable indicators for the commercialization of publicly-funded research. unu-merit.

Bell, E. (1993). Some current issues in technology transfer and academic-industrial relations:

a review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 5(3), 307-321.

Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the

individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.

Brandao, B., & Rücker, P. (2019). Universities institutional settings and academic entrepreneurship: notes from a developing country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 243-252.

Brouwer, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university licensing. Journal of Technology Transfer,

(3), 263-270.

Bubela, T. M., & Caulfield, T. (2010). Role and reality: technology transfer at Canadian universities. Trends in Biotechnology, 28, 447-451.

Calderón Martínez, M. (2017). Tercera misión de la universidad. Una revisión de la literatura

sobre emprendimiento académico. VinculaTegica, 3(1), 364-373.

Cantu-Ortiz, F., Galeano, N., Mora-Castro, P, & Fangmeyer, J. (2017). Spreading academic entrepreneurship: made in Mexico. Business Horizons, 60(4), 541-550.

Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research

Policy, 38, 936-946.

Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, N. (2005). Assessing the relative performance

of university ttos in the uk. Research Policy, 34, 369-384.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting

from technology. Boston, ma: Harvard Business School Press.

Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the University of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267-281.

Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Surrey: iau Press.

Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: new foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13(2), 17-23.

Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case

of a research-based spin-off. J. Bus. Ventur., 19(1), 55-79.

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183-216.

W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.

D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the uk: what are the factors underlying I have the variety of interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36, 1295-1313.

Dagnino, R., Thomas, H., & Davyt, A. (2000). Vinculacionismo/neovinculacionismo. Racionalidad de la interacción universidad-sector productivo en América Latina (1955 1995). En R. Casas & G. Valenti (Coords.), Dos ejes de la vinculación de las universidades a la producción. La formación de recursos humanos y las capacidades de producción (pp. 25-48). México: Plaza y Valdés Editores-Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, unam/uam.

Dalmarco, G., Hulsink, W., Blois, G. V. (2018). Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 99-111.

Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfers organizations

in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321-342.

Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.

Ding, W., & Choi, E. (2001). Divergent paths to commercial science: a comparison of scientists’

founding and advising activities. Research Policy, 40, 69-80.

Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinout from academic institutions: literature review with suggestions for further research. Journal Technologic Transfer, 33, 225-247.

Dutrenit, G., De Fuentes, C., & Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organizations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico. Science and

Public Policy, 37(7), 513-526.

El-Katany, M., & Awny, M. (2016). Universities third mission activities: case study from Egypt.

iamot, 25th Conference Proceedings.

Engel, J. S., & Del-Palacio, I. (2011). Global clusters of innovation: the case of Israel and Silicon Valley. Calif. Manag. Rev., 53(2), 27-49.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.

Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: the entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge

firmament. Technological Forescasting & Social Change, 123, 122-129.

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.

Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.

Etzkowitz, H., Germain-Alamartine, E., Keel, J., Kumar, C., Nelson, K., & Albats, E. (2019). Entrepreneurial university dynamics: structured ambivalence, relative deprivation and institution-formation in the Stanford innovation system. Technological Forecasting & Social

Change, 141, 159-171.

European Commission (ec). (2001). Building an innovative economy in Europe: a review of 12 studies of innovation policy and practice in today’s Europe. eur 17043.

Fellnhofer, K. (2019). Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: a biliometric mapping and visualization. Educational Research Review, 27, 28-55.

Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the ip system? Business creation in

academia. Research Policy, 39, 1060-1069.

Fini, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities

and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40, 1113-1127.

Forliano, C., De Bernardim, P., & Yahiaoui, D. (2021). Entrepreneurial universities: a bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains. Technological orecasting & Social Change, 165, 1-16.

Franklin, S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. J. Technol. Transf., 26(1-2), 127-141.

Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.

Fuster, E., Padilla-Meléndez, A., Lockett, N., & Del-Águila-Obra, A. (2019). The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: the case of Andalusia. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 219, 219-231.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1998). The new production of knowledge, the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: sage.

Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639.

Graham, R. (2014). Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from emerging world leaders. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small business Economics, 21(4), 329-341.

Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). ‘Academics’ organizational characteristics and the generation

of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821-845.

Grigg, T. (1994). Adopting an entrepreneurial approach in universities. Journal of Engineering

and Technology Management, 11(3-4), 273-298.

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Gajòn, E. (2014). Innovative pathways for university entrepreneurship in the 21th century advances in the study of entrepreneurship. Innovation and Economic Growth, 24, 89-118.

Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research

performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950.

Harmon, B., Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, R., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., et al. (1997). Mapping

the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(6), 423-434.

Hayter, C. S. (2013). Harnessing university entrepreneurship for economic growth factors of

success among university spin-offs. Econ. Dev. Q., 27(1), 18-28.

Hernández-Mondragón, A., Herrera-Estrella, L., & Kuriharcuch, W. (2016). Legislative environment and other factors that inhibit transfer of Mexican publicly funded research into

commercial ventures. Technology in Society, 46, 100-108.

Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., & Hamilton, K. (2001). The changing composition of innovative activity in the us. A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30(4), 681.

Higher Education Funding Council for England (hefce). (2006). Higher education-business

and community interaction survey, 2003-04. Available from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2006/06_25/

Hsu, D. H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture

capital funding. Research Policy, 36(5), 722-741.

Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy,

(9), 1555-1568.

Jensen, R. A., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240-259.

Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the current university

invention ownership model. Res. Policy, 38, 1407-1422.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Res. Policy, 40(10), 1354-1368.

Laukkanen, M. (2003). Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university-based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4), 372-382.

Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: an empirical

assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111.

Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). U.S. science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects

on the academic mission of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323-1356.

Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities spinout strategies. Small Business Economics, 20, 185-200.

López, T., & Álvarez, C. (2018). Entrepreneurship research in Latin America: a literature review.

Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 31(4), 736-756.

Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-131.

Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical

findings. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 773-776.

Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P.H., & Balkin, D. B. (2004). Entrepreneurship from the Ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4), 353-364.

Mazzucato, M. (2014). El Estado emprendedor. Barcelona: rba Libros.

Molas-Gallart, J., et al. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. United Kingdom: spru.

Molas-Gallart, J., & Castro-Martínez, E. (2007). Ambiguity and conflict in the development of

‘Third Mission’ indicators. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 321-330.

Moray, N., & Clarysse, B. (2005). Institutional change and resource endowments to science-

based entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 34(7), 1010-1027.

Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Ivory tower and industrial

innovation. University-industry technology transfers before and after the Bayh-Dole Act. California: Stanford University Press.

Ndonzuau, N., Pirnay, N., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation.

Technovation, 22(5), 281-289.

Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. D. (2009). Opportunity recognition and the

tendency to be an entrepreneur: a bivariate genetics perspective. Organizational Behavior

and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 108-117.

Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., Hunkin, J., & Spector, T. D. (2008). Is the tendency to

engage in entrepreneurship genetic? Management Science, 54(1), 167.

Nicolau, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts phenomenon. Management Science, 49(12), 1702-1726.

O’Shea, R., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff

activity: a conceptual framework. J. Technol. Transf., 33(6), 653-666.

Oliver, L. A. (2004). Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations. Research

Policy, 33(4), 583.

Osca-Lluch, J., Miguel, S., González, C., Peñaranda-Ortega, M., & Quiñones-Vidal, E. (2013). Cobertura y solapamiento de Web of Science y Scopus en el análisis de la actividad científica

española en psicología. Anal. Psicol., 29(3).

Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional

success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 99-114.

Pérez, M., & Ávila, I. (2015). Propuesta de indicadores de la comercialización de tecnología

universitaria en México. En Congreso Ricyt 2015.

Pérez, M., & Calderón, M. (2019). Avances normativos en la creación de empresas spin off

universitarias en México. Entreciencias, 7(20), 53-64.

Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic

engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university-industry relations.

Res. Policy, 42(2), 423-442.

Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31(4), 161-170. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003

Politis, D., Gabrielsson, J., & Shveykina, O. (2012). Early-stage finance and the role of external

entrepreneurs in the commercialization of university-generated knowledge. Ventur. Capital, 14(2-3), 175-198.

Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing

with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291-311.

Rasmussen, E. (2011). Book review: entrepreneurship education. International Small Business

Journal, 29(6), 731-733.

Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An

entrepreneurial competency perspective. J. Technol. Transf., 40(5), 782-799.

Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the

evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Res. Policy, 43(1), 92-106.

Ricyt. (2017). Manual de Valencia: propuesta de indicadores de vinculación de la universidad

con el entorno socioeconómico. Ricyt-oei.

Ricyt. (2019). Estado de la ciencia. Ricyt. Roberts, E. B., & Peters, D. H. (1981). Commercial innovation from university faculty. Research Policy, 10(2), 108-126.

Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy

of the literature. Ind. Corp. Change, 16(4), 691-791.

Sánchez, A., Ortiz Guzmán, A., Pérez, M., Rivera, I., & Pérez, S. (2019). Mecanismos de transferencia de tecnología como elementos de fortalecimiento del conocimiento acumulado en la industria biofarmacéutica mexicana: el caso de la udibi-ipn. Nova Scientia, 22(11), 246-273.

Saragossi, S., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003). What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 47-51.

Schmitz, A., Urbano, D., Aparecida, G., Artur, J., & Guerrero, M. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship in the case setting: a systematic literature review. International Entrepreneur Managment Journal, 13, 369-395.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research.

Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.

Shane, S. (2002). University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies. Journal of

Business Venturing, 17(6), 537-552.

Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: university spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, uk-Northampton, ma, usa: Edward Elgar.

Siegel, D. (2006). Technological entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? Br. J. Manag.,

(4), 582-595.

Siegel, D., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices

on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study.

Res. Policy, 32(1), 27-48.

Singh, A., Wong, P., & Ho, Y. (2015). The role of universities in the national innovation systems

of China and East Asian niess: an exploratory analysis of publications and patenting data.

Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(2), 140-156.

Smilor, R., Dietrich, G., & Gibson, D. (1993). The entrepreneurial university: the role of higher

education in the United States in technology commercialisation and economic development.

Cambridge, ma, usa: unesco.

Solleiro, J. L., & López, R. E. (1993). La experiencia reciente de vinculación universidad-empresa

en México. En G. A. Plonsky (Ed.), Cooperación empresa-universidad en Iberoamérica (pp. 137-160). Sao Paulo: cyted.

Somaya, D., Teece, D., & Wakeman, S. (2011). Innovation in multi-invention contexts: mapping

solutions to technological and intellectual property complexity. Calif. Manag. Rev., 53(4), 47-79.

Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal

of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144.

Sutz, J. (2000). The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy,

(2), 279-290.

Svensson, P., Klofsten, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). An entrepreneurial university strategy for renewing a declining industrial city: the Norrköping way. Eur. Plan. Stud., 20(4), 505-525.

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy, 15(6), 285-305.

Thorn, K., & Soo, M. (2006). Latin American universities and the third mission: trends, challenges and policy options. World Bank Policy Research. Working Paper 4002.

Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the Ivory tower? Sources of growth in

university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90-104.

Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual

property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109-124.

unico. (2005). uk university commercialisation survey: financial year 2004.Cambridge: Experian.

Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-441.

Villavicencio, D. (2017). Las vicisitudes de la innovación en biotecnología y nanotecnología

en México. México: Editorial Itaca-Conacyt.

Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university

high-tech spinout companies. Res. Policy, 33(1), 147-175.

Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Estadísticas de consulta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Métricas de publicación

354 215




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.