Main Article Content

Authors

Through a study of comparative law and the jurisprudence  of the Colombian Constitutional Court1  this book  analyzes the different  kinds of decisions in the Judicial  Review  Process and their effects. Professor Martínez classifies constitutional decisions as Interpretative  or Conditional, Integrative, and Substitutive. The first ones are those in which the normative efficiency is maintained,  but  the normative  scope is interpreted. The second  ones fill a legislative omission, and the last ones expel a regulation and fill the corresponding legal vacuum. Likewise the study analyzes how the court sets the temporal effects of its decisions.

Martínez-Caballero, A. (2010). Types of Sentences in the Judicial Review Process: The Colombian Case. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 2(1), 9–32. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/sociojuridicos/article/view/177

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.