Comparative Analysis of Administrative Justice Systems in Latin America

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.10825

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Published: Jan 21, 2022
Issue: Vol. 24 No. 1 (2022): Arbitraje de inversión
Section Papers


Keywords: Latin America comparative law administrative justice courts

Main Article Content

Authors

Ricardo Perlingeiro
Universidade Estácio de Sá

Abstract

This essay consists of a comparative analysis regarding the traditions of administrative law in Latin America, and their impact on the contemporary scene, as well as on the trends in the general orientations of their administrative justice systems. The method followed consists of pointing out the attributions of the administrative authorities and trying to identify the distinction, in Latin America, between the "administrative function of implementation", the "control of the legality of administrative decisions "(not related to any adjudication function) and the" protection of rights "(by means of a adjudication function), while we examine their historical genesis and future trends. In this perspective, the text addresses administrative powers and their limits; the prerogatives and instruments of the authorities in the exercise of their enforcement functions; the control of administrative decisions by the administrative authorities themselves and also by external bodies; as well as the judicial and extrajudicial protection of rights against administrative decisions.

How to Cite
Perlingeiro, R. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Administrative Justice Systems in Latin America. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.10825
References

Amunátegui Rivera, J. D. (1900). Resumen de derecho administrativo aplicado a la legislación de Chile. Santiago de Chile: La Razón.

Asimow, M. (2015). Five models of administrative adjudication. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 63(1), 3–32.

Barbosa, R. (1892). Habeas corpus. Bahia, Brasil: Typographia do Diario da Bahia.

Brewer Carías, A. R. (1987). Estado de derecho y control judicial. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.

Bueno, J. A. P. (1857). Direito público brazileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Typographia imp. e const. de J. Villeneuve E. C.

Cane, P. (2016). Controlling administrative power: an historical comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cassagne, J. C. (2003). Perspectivas de la justicia contencioso-administrativa en Argentina en el siglo xxi. En M. J. M. Chiner (Ed.), La justicia administrativa (pp. 117-134). Barcelona: Atelier Libros.

Castillo Velasco, J. M. del. (1875). Ensayo sobre el derecho administrativo mexicano, 2. México: Castilho Velasco e Hijos.

Cavalcanti, T. B. (1936). Instituições de direito administrativo brasileiro. 2. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Editora Freitas Bastos.

Chayes, A. (1976). The role of the judge in public law litigation. Harvard Law Review, 89(7), 1281–1316.

Fagundes, S. M. (1946). Da ação popular. Revista de Direito Administrativo, 6, 1-19.

Friedrich, C. J. (1941). Constitutional government and democracy: theory and practice in Europe and America. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

González Pérez, J., & Cassagne, J. C. (2005). La justicia administrativa en Iberoamérica. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.

Gordillo, A. (2005). Los tribunales administrativos como alternativa a la organización administrativa. rap, 955-962.

Gordillo, A. (2013). Tratado de derecho administrativo y obras selectas. Tomo 1. Buenos Aires: fda.

James, H. G. (1913). Principles of Prussian administration. New York: Macmillan Company.

Jèze, G. (1928). Los principios generales del derecho administrativo. Madrid: Reus.

Lares, T. (1852). Lecciones de derecho administrativo. México: Imprenta de Ignácio Cumplido.

Mashaw, J. L. (2005). Judicial review of administrative action: reflections on balancing political, managerial and legal accountability. Direito gv Law Review, 153-170.

Maurer, H. (2012). Derecho administrativo alemán. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Mayer, O. (1982). Derecho administrativo alemán. 1. Buenos Aires: Depalma.

Nunes, C. (1943). Do poder judiciário. Rio de Janeiro: Revista Forense.

Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA). (2010). ag/res. 2607 (xl- 0/10). Ley Modelo Interamericana sobre Acceso a la Información Pública.

Perlingeiro, R. (2007). A impugnação judicial de atos administrativos na defesa de interesses difuso, coletivo e individuais homogêneos. Revista de Direito do Estado, 7, 255-272.

Perlingeiro, R. (2016). Perspectiva histórica de la jurisdicción administrativa en América Latina: tradición europea continental versus influencia estadounidense. Revista de Derecho Administrativo, 103, 141-174.

Perlingeiro, R. (2018). Principals of the right of access to information in Latin America. En H.-J. Blanke & R. Perlingeiro (Eds.), The right of access to public information: an international comparative legal survey (pp. 71–130). Berlin: Springer.

Perlingeiro, R., & Sommermann, K.-P. (2014). Euro-American model code of administrative jurisdiction. Niterói, Brasil: Editora da uff .

Pinto, B. (1946). Separação de poderes. Revista de Direito Administrativo, 6, 243-275.

Ramírez, S. G. (2015). The relationship between Inter-American jurisdiction and states (national systems): some pertinent questions. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law, 5(1), 115–151.

Rivero, J. (2004). Curso de direito administrativo comparado. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.

Schwartz, B. (1954). French administrative law and the common-law world. New York: New York University Press.

Strauss, P. L. (1984). The place of agencies in government: separation of powers and the fourth branch. Columbia Law Review, 84(3), 573–669.

Strauss, P. L. (2016). An introduction to administrative justice in United States. North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.

Tácito, C. (1977). Presença norte-americana no direito administrativo brasileiro. Revista de Direito Administrativo, 129, 21-33.

Uruguay, V. (1862). Ensaio sobre o direito administrativo. Rio de Janeiro: Typographia Nacional.

Vianna, L. W., Carvalho, M. A. R., & Burgos, M. B. (2019). Quem somos: a magistratura que queremos. Brasília: Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros (amb).

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Publcation metrics

480 173




 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The opinions included in the articles are of the authors alone, and under no circumstance do they represent the views of the Editorial Council or Universidad del Rosario. Reproduction of all or part of other articles is allowed as long as the source is cited. This magazine provides free immediate access to its contents under the principle that making research available to the public at no charge promotes sharing of global knowledge.