Main Article Content

Authors

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between social support and the frequency of patients with acute complications of type 2diabetes. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on type 2 diabetic patients who consulted a level III hospital, between 2014 and 2015; the perception of social support (ci 95%) was measured with the questionnaire for medical outcomes studies on social support (MOS) in patients with and without acute complications of diabetes. A logistic regression model was applied to identify predictive variables for acute complications. Results: 205 patients were selected, average age 66 years old, 51,2% female, 56,6% married, 50,7% with acute complications, the majority with social support (83,6%; ci 95%, 76,1-91,2%); the average global social support in patients without acute complications was 78,9 (76,8-88,1), with complications 70,8 (68,3-73,2) for a group difference of 8,2; (ci 95%, 4,9-11,4). The lack of social support (β:3,581), the glucometry interval range between 177-309 (β:2,930), being married (β:1,845) and insulin treatment (β:1,672) predicted acute diabetes complications. Conclusion: Patients with acute complications had lower social support scores, and the interaction between the lack of social support and sociodemographic variables predicted a risk of acute complications. Social support should be explored in diabetic patients to improve treatment strategies.

Aníbal Alfonso Teherán Valderrama, Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

MD., Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda. 

María Camila Mejía Guatibonza, Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

MD., Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda. 

Luz Jannelle Álvarez Meza, Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

MD., Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

Yenny José Muñoz Ramírez, Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

MD., Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

María Claudia Barrera Céspedes, Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

Vanessa Cadavid González, Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.

Centro de Investigaciones, Fundación Universitaria Juan N. Corpas y Clínica Juan N. Corpas Ltda.
Teherán Valderrama A. A., Mejía Guatibonza M. C., Álvarez Meza, L. J., Muñoz Ramírez Y. J., Barrera Céspedes, M. C., & Cadavid González V. (2017). Relationship Between Social Support and Acute Complications of Diabetes Type 2: A Cross-Sectional Study. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 15(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.5757

Organización Mundial de la Salud (oms). Diabetes. 2013. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/media- centre/factsheets/fs312/es/

American Diabetes Association (ada). Standards of medical care in diabetes-2016. Disponible en: http:// care.diabetesjournals.org/content/suppl/2015/12/21/39.Supplement_1.DC2/2016-Standards-of-Care. pdf

Asociación Latinoamericana de Diabetes (alad). Guías alad sobre el diagnóstico, control y tratamiento de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 con medicina basada en evidencia. 2013. Disponible en: https://issuu.com/ alad-diabetes/docs/guias_alad_2013

Colombia, Ministerio de Salud. Carga de Enfermedades por Enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles y discapacidad en Colombia: Informe técnico Observatorio Nacional de Salud. 2015. Disponible en: http:// www.ins.gov.co/lineas-de-accion/ons/SiteAssets/Paginas/publicaciones/5to%20Informe%20ONS%20 v-f1.pdf

Azzollini S, Bail P, Vera V, Victoria A. El apoyo social y el autocuidado en diabetes tipo 2. Anu Inv. 2012;19(1):109-13.

Koetsenruijter J, van Lieshout J, Lionis C, Portillo MC, Vassilev I, Todorova E, et al. Social support and health in diabetes patients: An observational study in six European countries in an era of austerity. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135079.

Londoño N, Rogers H, Castilla J, Posada S, Ochoa N, Jaramillo MA, et al. Validación en Colombia del cuestionario mos de apoyo social. Int J of Psychological Research, 2012;5(1):142-50.

Bautista Rodríguez LM, Zambrano Plata GE. La calidad de vida percibida en pacientes diabéticos tipo 2. Investig Enferm Imagen Desarr. 2015;17(1):131-48.

Woods SB, Priest JB, Roush T. The biobehavioral family model: Testing social support as an additional exogenous variable. Fam Process. 2014;53(4):672-85.

Liao CC, Li CR, Lee SH, Liao WC, Liao MY, Lin J, et al. Social support and mortality among the aged people with major disease or ADF disabilities in Taiwan: A national study. Arch Gerontol Geria- tr. 2015;60(2):317-21.

McWilliams LA, Higgins KS, Dick BD, Verrier MJ. A longitudinal investigation of pain-related social support preferences in a chronic pain treatment sample. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(8):672-8.

Rodríguez A, Camacho EJ, Escoto M del C, Contreras G, Casas D. Social representation of family support for diabetic patients in users of a family medicine unit in Chalco, State of Mexico. Medwave. 2014;14(7):e6011.

Frenkel W, Jongerius E, Mandjes-van Uitert M, Van Munster B, De Rooij S. Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in acutely hospitalized elderly adults: A prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(2):342-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12635

Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. STROBE Initiative.The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-7.

Umpierrez G, Korytkowski M. Diabetic emergencies-ketoacidosis, hyperglycaemichy perosmolarstate and hypoglycaemia. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016 Apr;12(4):222-32. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.15

Venkataraman K, Kannan AT, Kalra OP, Gambhir JK, Sharma AK, Sundaram KR, Mohan V. Diabetes self-efficacy strongly influences actual control of diabetes in patients attending a tertiary hospital in India. J Community Health. 2012;37(3):653-62.

Aron D, Conlin PR, Hobbs C, Vigersky RA, Pogach L. Individualizing glycemic targets in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(5):340-1.

Hempler NF, Joensen LE, WillaingI. Relationship between social network, social support and health behaviour in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Cross-sectional studies. BMC Public Health. 2016 feb 29;16:198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2819-1

Vissenberg C, Stronks K, Nijpels G, Uitewaal PJ, Middelkoop BJ, Kohinor MJ, et al. Impact of a social network-based intervention promoting diabetes self-management in socioeconomically deprived patients: a qualitative evaluation of the intervention strategies. BMJ Open. 2016 abr 13;6(4):e010254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010254

Fachado A, Menéndez M, González L. Apoyo social: mecanismos y modelos de in uencia sobre la enfermedad crónica. Cad Aten Primaria. 2013;19:118-123. Disponible en: http://www.agamfec.com/ wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/19_2_ParaSaberDe_3.pdf

Figueroa C, Gamarra G. Factores asociados con no control metabólico en diabéticos pertenecientes a un programa de riesgo cardiovascular. Acta Med Colomb. 2013;38(4):213-21.

Caicedo D, Duarte C, González K, Gualdrón E, Guamán R, Igua D, et al. Factores no farmacológicos asociados al control de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Medicas uis. 2012;25(1):29-43.

Ariza E, Camacho N, Londoño E, Niño C, Sequeda C, Solano C, et al. Factores asociados a control metabólico en pacientes diabéticos tipo 2; UBA Manga de Coomeva EPS en Cartagena (Colombia). Salud Uninorte. 2005;21:28-40.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.