Main Article Content

Authors

Introduction: The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is one of the most widely utilized instruments for measuring emotional stress in health studies. However, there is limited knowledge regarding its psychometric performance among healthcare personnel in Colombia. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) among healthcare professionals in Indias, Colombia.


Methods: An instrumental study was conducted involving 500 healthcare professionals, selected through a non-probability convenience sampling method. The process included the assessment of data adequacy, dimensionality, internal validity, and factorial structure.


Results: The analysis based on eigenvalues projected two dimensions and confirmed the original version of the scale, with ten items explaining 72.58% of the total variance. Data suitability, goodness-of-fit indexes, and internal validity reported adequate coefficients. The overall internal consistency with Cronbach's Ordinal Alpha (α=0.86) and McDonald's Omega (ω=0.86) was adequate, as were the ordinal alpha and omega for perceived stress (α=0.88; ω=0.87) and coping ability (α=0.82; ω=0.82).


Conclusion: Strong evidence is reported regarding the data suitability, dimensionality, internal validity, and factor structure of the PSS-10. Its use is recommended in similar samples to corroborate the findings.

Álvarez-Merlano, N. (2026). Perceived Stress Scale-10 (pss-10):: Psychometric Performance in Healthcare Personnel in Cartagena de Indias – Colombia. Revista Ciencias De La Salud, 24(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.14778

World Health Organization. Stress [internet]. Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean: World Health Organization; 2023 [citado 2024 jun 23]. Disponible en: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/375651

Bartlett D. Stress: perspectives and processes. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill Education; 1998.

O'Connor DB, Thayer JF, Vedhara K. Stress and health: a review of psychobiological processes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021;72(1):663-88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-062520-122331

Keller A, Litzelman K, Wisk LE, Maddox T, Cheng ER, Creswell PD, et al. Does the perception that stress affects health matter? The association with health and mortality. Health Psychol. 2012;31(5):677-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026743

Vancampfort D, Koyanagi A, Ward PB, Veronese N, Carvalho AF, Solmi M, et al. Perceived stress and its relationship with chronic medical conditions and multimorbidity among 229,293 community-dwelling adults in 44 low- and middle-income countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(8):979-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx159

Nolte D, Weiffen B. Regionalism under stress: Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective [internet]. Inglaterra: Routledge; 2020 [citado 2024 jun 23]. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429442186

Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social de Colombia. Encuesta de Minsalud revela que el 66,3 % de los colombianos declara haber enfrentado algún problema de salud mental [internet]. 2023 [citado 2024 jun 23]. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Paginas/66-porciento-de-colombianos-declara-haber-enfrentado-algun-problema-de-salud-mental.aspx

Bovier PA, Chamot E, Perneger TV. Perceived stress, internal resources, and social support as determinants of mental health among young adults. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:161-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000015288.43768.e4

Lindholdt L, Labriola M, Andersen JH, Kjeldsen MMZ, Obel C, Lund T. Perceived stress among adolescents as a marker for future mental disorders: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Public Health. 2022;50(3):412-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494821993719

Yılmaz Koğar E, Koğar H. A systematic review and meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10 and PSS-14). Stress Health. 2024;40(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3285

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404

Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. En: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, editores. The social psychology of health. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1988. p. 31-67.

Cohen S, Tyrrell DA, Smith AP. Negative life events, perceived stress, negative affect, and susceptibility to the common cold. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;64(1):131-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.131

Reyna C, Mola DJ, Correa PS. Escala de estrés percibido: análisis psicométrico desde la TCT y la TRI. Ansiedad Estrés. 2019;25(2):138-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2019.04.003

Nielsen MG, Ørnbøl E, Vestergaard M, Bech P, Larsen FB, Lasgaard M, et al. The construct validity of the perceived stress scale. J Psychosom Res. 2016;84:22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.009

Campbell M, Gromer-Thomas J, Maynard DM, Emmanuel M. Measuring stress in Caribbean university students: validation of the PSS-10 in Barbados. Caribb J Psychol. 2019;10:65-88.

Miranda AR, Scotta AV, Méndez AL, Serra SV, Soria EA. Public sector workers' mental health in Argentina: comparative psychometrics of the perceived stress scale. J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(6):429-38. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.229

Ruisoto P, López-Guerra VM, Paladines MB, Vaca SL, Cacho R. Psychometric properties of the three versions of the perceived stress scale in Ecuador. Physiol Behav. 2020;224:113045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113045

Jorquera-Gutiérrez R, Guerra Díaz F. Análisis psicométrico de la Escala de Estrés Percibido (PSS-14 y PSS-10) en un grupo de docentes de Copiapó, Chile. Liberabit. 2023;29(1):e683. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2023.v29n1.683

Campo-Arias A, Bustos-Leiton GJ, Romero-Chaparro A. Consistencia interna y dimensionalidad de la Escala de Estrés Percibido (EEP-10 y EEP-14) en una muestra de universitarias de Bogotá, Colombia. Aquichan. 2009;9(3):271-80.

Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC, Herazo E. Escala de estrés percibido-10: desempeño psicométrico en estudiantes de medicina de Bucaramanga, Colombia. Rev Fac Med. 2015;62(3):407-13. https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v62n3.43735

Loewenthal KM, Lewis CA. An introduction to psychological tests and scales. London: Routledge; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561387

Lee EH. Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nurs Res. 2012;6(4):121-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004

Xuan W, Williams K, Peat JK. Health science research: a handbook of quantitative methods. London: Routledge; 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115922

Remor E. Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the perceived stress scale (PSS). Span J Psychol. 2006;9(1):86-93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006004

Ortegón TM, Vinaccia S, Quiceno JM, Capira A, Cerra D, Bernal S, et al. Apoyo social, resiliencia, estrés percibido, estrés postraumático, ansiedad, depresión y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en líderes comunitarios víctimas del conflicto armado en los Montes de María, Sucre, Colombia. Eleuthera. 2022;24(1):158-178. https://doi.org/10.17151/eleu.2022.24.1.8

Saldaña MR. Pruebas de bondad de ajuste a una distribución normal. Rev Enferm Trab. 2016;6(3):106-14.

Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

Bartlett MS. Test of significance in factor analysis. Br J Psychol. 1950;3(1):77-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x

Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U, Hernández-Dorado A, Muñiz J. Decálogo para el análisis factorial de los ítems de un test. Psicothema. 2022;34(1):7-17. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.456

McNeish D, Wolf MG. Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychol Methods. 2023;28(1):61-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425

McNeish D. Generalizability of dynamic fit index, equivalence testing, and Hu & Bentler cutoffs for evaluating fit in factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res. 2023;58(1):195-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2022.2163477

Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022

Viladrich C, Angulo A, Doval E. Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. An Psicol. 2017;33(3):755. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401

Vizioli N, Pagano A. De alfa a omega: estimación de la confiabilidad ordinal. Una guía práctica. Rev Costarric Psicol. 2022;41(2):119-36. https://doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v41i02.02

Ventura-León JL, Caycho-Rodríguez T. El coeficiente omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Rev Latinoam Cienc Soc Niñez Juv. 2017;15(1):625-7.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.