Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

Este artigo conceitual interroga o papel do direito migratório dentro da ordem jurídica europeia moderna, expondo seu enraizamento na soberania estatal. Com base no pensamento jurídico indígena, no pós-estruturalismo e na teoria pós-anarquista, este trabalho desafia a naturalização das fronteiras, a cidadania e a soberania territorial, e propõe legalidades alternativas locais e relacionais. A análise critica o domínio epistemológico do direito europeu moderno na definição da migração irregular e do trabalho migrante, destacando como os controles temporais e espaciais reproduzem a exclusão. Por meio dos conceitos de responsabilidade relacional (do pensamento jurídico indígena), ecotécnica (do pós-estruturalismo) e visão coletiva (do pós-anarquismo), o artigo defende uma práxis decolonial fundamentada baseada na legalidade local, relacional e vivida, em vez de uma forma jurídica centrada no Estado. Este trabalho contribui para a pesquisa jurídica crítica ao teorizar o direito migratório além da soberania, em direção a uma ontologia do direito enraizada no local, na comunidade e na experiência vivida.

Tataryn, A. (2026). O lugar da lei de migração em tempos de soberania. Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 28(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.15742

Adébísí, F. (2023). Decolonisation and Legal Knowledge. Bristol University Press.

Adébísí, F., & Russell, Y. (2024). Troubling Law’s Traditional Canon by Teaching Law and Race. In F. Adébísí, S. Jivraj, & N. Tzouvala (Eds.), Decolonisation, Anti-Racism, and Legal Pedagogy (pp. 256-268). Routledge.

Adébísí, F., Jivraj S., & Tzouvala, N. (Eds.). (2024). Decolonisation, Anti-Racism, and Legal Pedagogy. Routledge.

Anderson, B. (2013). Us and Them? The dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford University Press.

Anderson, B. (2019). New directions in migration studies: towards methodological de-nationalism. CMS, 7, 36.

Anderson, B. (2025). Rethinking Migration: Challenging Borders, Citizenship and Race. Bristol University Press.

Beckett, L., & Singh, M. (2025, June 26). ´We are seeing the best of LA´: As ICE raids haunt the city, Angelenos are showing up for each other. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/26/los-angeles-residents-immigrants-ice-resistance

Bhatia, A. (2021). Statehood, Canadian sovereignty, and the attempted domestication of Indigenous legal relations. In S. Xavier, B. Jacobs, V. Waboose, J. Hewitt, & A. Bhatia (Eds.). Decolonising Law: Indigenous, Third World and Settler Perspectives. Routledge.

Borrows, J. (1999). Sovereignty’s Alchemy: An analysis of Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 37, 537-596.

Borrows, J. (2010). Drawing Out Law. University of Toronto Press.

Borrows, J. (2016). Outsider Education: Indigenous Law and Land-Based Learning. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 33(1), 1-27.

Conely, V., Goh, I. (2014). Nancy Now. Polity Press.

Coulthard, G. (2014). Red Skin White Masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press.

Dauvergne, C. (2014). Irregular migration, state sovereignty and the rule of law. In V. Chetail & C. Bauloz (Eds.). Research Handbook on International Law and Migration. Edward Elgar.

Dussel, E. (2003). Beyond Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Fitzpatrick, P. (1992). The Mythology of Modern Law. Routledge.

Gill, J. & Taylor, L. (2025). Fortress Europe: Migration Flashpoints. Thompson Reuters Foundation.

Gonzalez. F. (2025). The rise of social media as a DIY alert system for ICE raids. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/the-rise-of-social-media-as-a-diy-alert-system-for-ice-raids/

Grabham, E. (2016). Brewing Legal Times. University of Toronto Press.

Gray, M. & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost workers: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The Structure of Knowledge in Westernised Universities. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 6(1), 73-90.

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Hart, HLA. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.

Johnson, R. (2025, forthcoming). Coming to Know – Strategies and Practices for Engaging with Indigenous Legal Orders in the Law School Classroom [Unpublished draft manuscript].

Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 25(4), 742-759.

Marks, S. (2009). False contingency. Current Legal Problems 62 (1), 1-21.

Martel, J. (2022). Anarchist prophets: Disappointing vision and the power of collective sight. Duke University Press.

Mignolo, W. & Walsh, C. (2018). On Decoloniality. Duke University Press.

Mignolo, W. (2007). Delinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 449 – 514.

Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity. Duke University Press.

Morris, R. (2025, July 9). ‘Detained in immigration raid, MAGA mom still has faith in Trump’s mass deportation plan’. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3vd1vn9n06o

Nancy, J-L. (1991). The Inoperative Community. Minnesota University Press.

Nancy, J-L. (1993). The Experience of Freedom. Stanford University Press.

Nancy, J-L. (2000). Being Singular Plural. Stanford University Press.

Napolean, V. & Friedland, H. (2016). An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories. McGill Law Journal, 61(4), 725.

Napoleón, V. (2014). Pensando en los Ordenamientos Jurídicos Indígenas de Canadá. Derecho & Sociedad, 42, 137-158.

Newman, S. (2019). Post-anarchism. Polity Press.

Perulli, A. & Treu, T. (2025). Labour Law in the Mirror. Klewer Law International.

Piro, V. (2021). Migrant farmworkers in ‘plastic factories’: Investigating work-life struggles. Palgrave Macmillan.

Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 168-178.

Shah, S. (2021). Concept: Colonial Modernity. In I. Wall, F. Middleton, S. Shah, & CLAW (Eds.), Critical Legal Pocketbook. Counterpress.

Sharma, N. (2020). Home Rule: national sovereignty and the separation of natives and migrants. Duke University Press.

Simpson, L. (2017). As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom Through Radical Resistance. University of Minnesota Press.

Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: A New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury.

Tataryn, A. (2021). Law, Labour and Precarious Migration: Ecotechnics of the Social. Routledge.

Tataryn, A. (2025). Social reproduction and migrant labour: Extending the view to Sicilian olive groves and tomato greenhouses. International Journal of Law in Context, Advance online publication, 1-18.

Tomba, M. (2019). Insurgent universality: An alternative legacy of modernity. Oxford University Press.

Tomba, M. (2022). What is (insurgent) universality: A reply. Historical Materialism 30(4), 125-136.

Unger, R.M. (2001). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. Verso.

Walsh, C. (2023). Rising Up, Living On. Duke University Press.

Wilson, S. (2008). Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing.

Wimmer, A. & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks 2(4), 301-334.

Xavier, S., Jacobs, B., Waboose, V., Hewitt, J., & Bhatia, A. (2021). Decolonising Law: Indigenous, Third World and Settler Perspectives. Routledge.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.