Main Article Content

Authors

Contemporary legal research faces the challenge of incorporating methodologies used in other social sciences; it is in this scenario that Network Theory appears as an instrument that provides tools in the approach to the study of law. There are three applications for network analysis, norm networks, jurisprudential networks, and textual networks to analyze the internal structure of a norm. After presenting the three perspectives as a way to bring other researchers closer to the use of networks in legal sciences, they state that the potential of networks in handling large amounts of information can become a limitation due to the inability to observe the details of the objects of study.

Castañeda Guerrero, D. A. (2021). The Network Theory in Legal Investigations: A Review of the Literature. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 23(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.9359

Agnoloni, T., & Pagallo, U. (2014). The case law of the Italian Constitutional Court between network theory and philosophy of information. En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law (pp. 11-38). http://www.leibnizcenter.org/~winkels/NAiL2014-pre-proceedings.pdf

Ajani, G., Boella, G., Lesmo, L., Mazzei, R., Radicioni, D. P., & Rossi, P. (2008). Legal taxonomy syllabus: Handling multilevel legal ontologies. Proceedings of LangTech 2008, 3-6. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?-doi=10.1.1.110.6427

Arjona Sánchez, M. J. (2010). El derecho en red: una aproximación desde el derecho europeo. Videtur Quod, Anuario del Pensamiento Crítico, (2), 1-183. http://www.liberlex.com/archivos/derechoenred.pdf

Ashley, K., Ferrell, E., Potter, M., Guclu, H., Savelka, J., & Grabmai, M. (2014). Statutory network analysis plus information retrieval. En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law (pp. 1-7).

Augsberg, I. (2009). The relevance of network models within the juridic discourse empirical, sociological , and epistemological perspectives. German Law Journal, 10(4), 383-394. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/56b82cfe746fb90712deab40/1454910718465/GLJ_Vol_10_No_04_Augsberg.pdf

Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Dunne, P. E. S., & Staniford, G. (1997). Modelling legal documents as graphs. Information & Communications Technology Law, 6(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23

Boella, G., di Caro, L., Violato, A., & Robaldo, L. (2014). Exploiting networks in Law. International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (lrec), 1654-1658. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/95_Paper.pdf

Bommarito, M., & Katz, D. (2010). A mathematical approach to the study of the United States Code. Physica A, 389(19), 4195-4200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.05.057

Boulet, R., Mazzega, P., & Bourcier, D. (2010). Network analysis of the French Enviromental Code. ai Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Complex Systems, the Semantic Web, Ontologies, Argumentation, and Dialogue. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6237, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5

Boulet, R., Mazzega, P., & Bourcier, D. (2011). A network approach to the French system of legal codes—part I: Analysis of a dense network. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(4), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-011-9116-1

Bourcier, D., & Mazzega, P. (2007). Codification, law article and graphs. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems , jurix 2007: The Twentieth Annual Conference, 29-38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220809998

Cairns, J. W. (2013). Watson, Walton, and the history of legal transplants. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 41(1), 637-696.

Caldarelli, G., & Catanzaro, M. (2012). Redes: Una breve introducción. Alianza.

Dawson, J. P. (1982). Review: The making of the civil law. Alan Watson. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1981. Chicago Law Review, 1(49), 595-604. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23

Fitzgerald, J. (2014). Network analysis as an aid to legal interpretation can counting and drawing rules help lawyers understand the context of those rules? En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law (pp. 72-82). http://www.leibnizcenter.org/~winkels/NAiL2014-pre-proceedings.pdf

Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T. R., Spriggs, J. F., Jeon, S., & Wahlbeck, P. J. (2007). Network analysis and the law: Measuring the legal importance of precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis, 15(3), 324-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm011

Garbarino, C. (2014). A model of legal systems as evolutionary networks: Normative complexity and self-organization of clusters of rule. En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law (pp. 138-159).

Gultemen, D., & van Engers, T. (2014). Graph-based linking and visualization for legislation documents (glvd). En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 137-156). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Hamdaqa, M., & Hamou-Lhadj, A. (2011). An approach based on citation analysis to support effective handling of regulatory compliance. Future Generation Computer Systems, 27(4), 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2010.09.007

Hoekstra, R. (2014). A network analysis of Dutch regulations using the metalex document server. En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 95-112). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Karstens, B., Koolen, M., Dari-Mattiacci, G., Bod, R., & Ginsburg, T. (2014). Reference structures of national constitutions. En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law (pp. 50-60).

Kelsen, H. (1982). Teoría pura del derecho. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Koniaris, M., Anagnostopoulos, I., & Vassiliou, Y. (2015). Network analysis in the legal domain: A complex model for European Union legal sources. Journal of Complex Networks. https://doi.org/10.1093/COMNET/CNX029

Kuppevelt, D., & van Dijck, G. (2017). Answering legal research questions about Dutch case law with network analysis and visualization. En A. Wyner & G. Casini (Eds.), Legal knowledge and information systems (pp. 95-100). ios Press.

ettieri, N., Faro, S., Vicidomini, L., & Altamura, A. (2014a). Nets of legal information connecting and displaying heterogeneous legal source. En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law.

Lettieri, N., Malandrino, D., Spinelli, R., & Rinaldi, C. (2014b). From structure to function. Exploring the use of text and social network analysis in criminal investigations. En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 79-94). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Lettieri, N., Malandrino, D., & Vicidomini, L. (2014c). Document-enhacement and network analisys for criminal investigation: An holistic approach. En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law (pp. 16-38).

Losano, M. G. (2005). Derecho turbulento: En busca de nuevos paradigmas en las relaciones entre derechos nacionales y normativas supraestatales. doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, 28, 159-182.

Martin Katz, D., & Bommarito, M. (2011). Network analysis and law tutorial. http://computationallegalstudies.com/network-analysis-and-law-tutorial/

Mazzega, P., Bourcier, D., & Boulet, R. (2009). The network of French legal codes. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (icail ’09), 236-237. https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568271

Mimouni, N., Nazarenko, A., & Salotti, S. (2014). An approach for searching and browsing a network of legal documents. En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 183-208). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks an introduction. Oxford University Press. Ost, F., & van de Kerchoven, M. (2002). De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit. Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis.

Panagis, Y., & Tarissan, F. (2017). Giving every case its (legal) due. The contribution of citation networks and text similarity techniques to legal studies of European Union law. En A. Wyner & G. Casini (Eds.), Legal knowledge and information systems (pp. 59-68). ios Press.

Smith, T. A. C. (2005). The web of law. San Diego Legal Studies Research Paper, 6(11), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.642863

Sweeney, P., Bjerke, E., Potter, M., Guclu, H., Keane, C., Ashley, K., & Grabmair, Rebecca, H. (2014). Network analysis of manually-encoded state laws and prospects for automation. En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 53-78). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Szöke, Á., Mácsár, K., & Strausz, G. (2014). Knowledge extraction framework for analyzing legal documents. En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network Analysis in Law (pp. 113-136). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Tamme, T., Vohandu, L., & Task, E. (2014). A method to compare the complexity of legal acts. En R. Winkels & N. Lettieri (Eds.), Second International Workshop on Network Analysis in Law (pp. 105-114).

Täsk, E., Vohandu, L., Lohk, A., & Liiv, I. (2011). An experiment to find the deep structure of Estonian legislation. En K. Atkinson (Ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems (pp. 93-102). ios Press.

Watson, A. (1983a). Legal change : Sources of law and legal culture. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 131(5), 1121-1157.

Watson, A. (1993). Legal transplant: An approach to comparative law. University of Georgia Press.

Watson, A. (2001a). Society and legal change. Temple University Press.

Watson, A. (2001b). The evolution of western private law. The Jonhns Hopkins University Press.

Watson, A. (2007). Comparative law: Law, reality and society. Vandeplas Publishing.

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

Whalen, R. (2014a). Bad law before it goes bad: Citation networks and the life cycle of overruled supreme court precedent. En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 1-22). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Whalen, R. (2014b). Citation networks and the life cycle of overruled Supreme Court precedent. En Radbound Winkels, L. Nicola, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 1-22). Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

Winkels, R., & Boer, A. (2014). Finding and visualizing Dutch legislative context networks. En R. Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 157-182). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Winkels, R., de Ruyter, J., & Kroese, H. (2011). Determining authority of Dutch case law. En K. Atkinson (Ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems (pp. 103-112). ios Press.

Zhang, P., Silver, H., Wasson, M., Steiner, D., & Saharma, S. (2014). Knowledge network based on legal issues. En Radboud Winkels, N. Lettieri, & S. Faro (Eds.), Network analysis in law (pp. 23-52). Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An introduction to comparative law. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.