O lugar da lei de migração em tempos de soberania

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.15742

Barra lateral de artigos

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))

Publicado: ene 15, 2026
Edição: v. 28 n. 1 (2026): Decolonialidad y Constitucionalismo Transformador
Seção Dossier Decolonialidad y Constitucionalismo Transformador


Palavras-chave: direito migratório soberania estatal práxis decolonial pensamento jurídico indígena exclusão estrutural

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

  Anastasia Tataryn
St. Jeromes University

Resumo

Este artigo conceitual interroga o papel do direito migratório dentro da ordem jurídica europeia moderna, expondo seu enraizamento na soberania estatal. Com base no pensamento jurídico indígena, no pós-estruturalismo e na teoria pós-anarquista, este trabalho desafia a naturalização das fronteiras, a cidadania e a soberania territorial, e propõe legalidades alternativas locais e relacionais. A análise critica o domínio epistemológico do direito europeu moderno na definição da migração irregular e do trabalho migrante, destacando como os controles temporais e espaciais reproduzem a exclusão. Por meio dos conceitos de responsabilidade relacional (do pensamento jurídico indígena), ecotécnica (do pós-estruturalismo) e visão coletiva (do pós-anarquismo), o artigo defende uma práxis decolonial fundamentada baseada na legalidade local, relacional e vivida, em vez de uma forma jurídica centrada no Estado. Este trabalho contribui para a pesquisa jurídica crítica ao teorizar o direito migratório além da soberania, em direção a uma ontologia do direito enraizada no local, na comunidade e na experiência vivida.

Como Citar
Tataryn, A. (2026). O lugar da lei de migração em tempos de soberania. Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 28(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.15742
Referências

Adébísí, F. (2023). Decolonisation and Legal Knowledge. Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529219371.001.0001

Adébísí, F., & Russell, Y. (2024). Troubling Law’s Traditional Canon by Teaching Law and Race. In F. Adébísí, S. Jivraj, & N. Tzouvala (Eds.), Decolonisation, Anti-Racism, and Legal Pedagogy (pp. 256-268). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397885-21

Adébísí, F., Jivraj S., & Tzouvala, N. (Eds.). (2024). Decolonisation, Anti-Racism, and Legal Pedagogy. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397885

Anderson, B. (2013). Us and Them? The dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691593.001.0001

Anderson, B. (2019). New directions in migration studies: towards methodological de-nationalism. CMS, 7, 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0140-8

Anderson, B. (2025). Rethinking Migration: Challenging Borders, Citizenship and Race. Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529234497

Beckett, L., & Singh, M. (2025, June 26). ´We are seeing the best of LA´: As ICE raids haunt the city, Angelenos are showing up for each other. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/26/los-angeles-residents-immigrants-ice-resistance

Bhatia, A. (2021). Statehood, Canadian sovereignty, and the attempted domestication of Indigenous legal relations. In S. Xavier, B. Jacobs, V. Waboose, J. Hewitt, & A. Bhatia (Eds.). Decolonising Law: Indigenous, Third World and Settler Perspectives. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161387-4

Borrows, J. (1999). Sovereignty’s Alchemy: An analysis of Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 37, 537-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1522

Borrows, J. (2010). Drawing Out Law. University of Toronto Press.

Borrows, J. (2016). Outsider Education: Indigenous Law and Land-Based Learning. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 33(1), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4807

Conely, V., Goh, I. (2014). Nancy Now. Polity Press.

Coulthard, G. (2014). Red Skin White Masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679645.001.0001

Dauvergne, C. (2014). Irregular migration, state sovereignty and the rule of law. In V. Chetail & C. Bauloz (Eds.). Research Handbook on International Law and Migration. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930057.00007

Dussel, E. (2003). Beyond Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216406266

Fitzpatrick, P. (1992). The Mythology of Modern Law. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203308943

Gill, J. & Taylor, L. (2025). Fortress Europe: Migration Flashpoints. Thompson Reuters Foundation.

Gonzalez. F. (2025). The rise of social media as a DIY alert system for ICE raids. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/the-rise-of-social-media-as-a-diy-alert-system-for-ice-raids/

Grabham, E. (2016). Brewing Legal Times. University of Toronto Press.

Gray, M. & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost workers: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The Structure of Knowledge in Westernised Universities. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 6(1), 73-90.

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q

Hart, HLA. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.

Johnson, R. (2025, forthcoming). Coming to Know – Strategies and Practices for Engaging with Indigenous Legal Orders in the Law School Classroom [Unpublished draft manuscript].

Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 25(4), 742-759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x

Marks, S. (2009). False contingency. Current Legal Problems 62 (1), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/62.1.1

Martel, J. (2022). Anarchist prophets: Disappointing vision and the power of collective sight. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478023043

Mignolo, W. & Walsh, C. (2018). On Decoloniality. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371779

Mignolo, W. (2007). Delinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 449 – 514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647

Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jqbw

Morris, R. (2025, July 9). ‘Detained in immigration raid, MAGA mom still has faith in Trump’s mass deportation plan’. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3vd1vn9n06o

Nancy, J-L. (1991). The Inoperative Community. Minnesota University Press.

Nancy, J-L. (1993). The Experience of Freedom. Stanford University Press.

Nancy, J-L. (2000). Being Singular Plural. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619005

Napolean, V. & Friedland, H. (2016). An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories. McGill Law Journal, 61(4), 725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1038487ar

Napoleón, V. (2014). Pensando en los Ordenamientos Jurídicos Indígenas de Canadá. Derecho & Sociedad, 42, 137-158.

Newman, S. (2019). Post-anarchism. Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315693163-5

Perulli, A. & Treu, T. (2025). Labour Law in the Mirror. Klewer Law International.

Piro, V. (2021). Migrant farmworkers in ‘plastic factories’: Investigating work-life struggles. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74509-7

Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 168-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353

Shah, S. (2021). Concept: Colonial Modernity. In I. Wall, F. Middleton, S. Shah, & CLAW (Eds.), Critical Legal Pocketbook. Counterpress.

Sharma, N. (2020). Home Rule: national sovereignty and the separation of natives and migrants. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002451

Simpson, L. (2017). As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom Through Radical Resistance. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt77c

Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: A New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849664554

Tataryn, A. (2021). Law, Labour and Precarious Migration: Ecotechnics of the Social. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204673-4

Tataryn, A. (2025). Social reproduction and migrant labour: Extending the view to Sicilian olive groves and tomato greenhouses. International Journal of Law in Context, Advance online publication, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552325100207

Tomba, M. (2019). Insurgent universality: An alternative legacy of modernity. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190883089.001.0001

Tomba, M. (2022). What is (insurgent) universality: A reply. Historical Materialism 30(4), 125-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-20222306

Unger, R.M. (2001). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. Verso.

Walsh, C. (2023). Rising Up, Living On. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478024156

Wilson, S. (2008). Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing.

Wimmer, A. & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks 2(4), 301-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00043

Xavier, S., Jacobs, B., Waboose, V., Hewitt, J., & Bhatia, A. (2021). Decolonising Law: Indigenous, Third World and Settler Perspectives. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161387

Estatísticas de consulta

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Métricas de publicação

0




 

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

As opiniões dos artigos só comprometem aos autores e em nenhum caso ao Conselho Editorial nem à Universidad del Rosario. Permite-se a reprodução total ou parcial dos artigos citando a fonte. esta revista provê acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo sob o princípio que fazer disponível gratuitamente pesquisas ao público apoia a um maior intercâmbio de conhecimento global.