Contenido principal del artículo

Luis Lanteri

Este trabajo analiza la existencia de la enfermedad holandesa en el caso de la economía argentina. Se investigan los choques en los términos del intercambio y en la oferta del sector agropecuario (sector en auge) sobre el producto manufacturero (pib real), las tasas de inflación y el desempleo. Se incluyen modelos de var, con restricciones de largo plazo, y datos trimestrales de Argentina, que cubren el período 1993-2015. Los resultados muestran que los choques de precios externos afectan positivamente al producto manufacturero y negativamente a las tasas de desempleo. No habría evidencia sustancial sobre la existencia de la enfermedad holandesa en esta economía.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Lanteri, L. (2015). Efectos de la enfermedad holandesa (’Dutch disease’). Alguna evidencia para Argentina. Revista De Economía Del Rosario, 18(02), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.12804/rev.econ.rosario.18.02.2015.02

Adler, G., & Magud, N. (2015). Four decades of terms-of-trade booms: a metric of income windfall. Journal of International Money and Finance, (55), 162-192.

Bjornland, H. (1998). The economic effects of North Sea oil on the manufacturing sector. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, (45), 553-585.

Bjornland, H., & Thorsrud, L. (2014a). Boom of gloom? Examining the Dutch disease in two-speed economies. Oslo: Norges Bank.

Bjornland, H., & Thorsrud, L. (2014b). What is the effect of an oil price decrease on the Norwegian economy? Oslo: Norges Bank.

Blanchard, O., & Quah, D. (1989). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review, (79), 655-673.

Bresser-Pereira, L. (2008). The Dutch disease and its neutralization: a Ricardian approach. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, (28), 47-71.

Bruno, M., & Sachs, J. (1982). Energy and resource allocation: a dynamic model of the Dutch disease. The Review of Economic Studies, (49), 845-859.

Charnavoki, V., & Dolado, J. (2014). The effects of global shocks on small commodity-exporting economies: lessons from Canada. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, (6), 207-237.

Chen, Y., & Rogoff, K. (2003). Commodity currencies. Journal of International Economics, (60), 133-160.

Clarida, R., & Gali, J. (1994). Sources of real exchange fluctuations: how important are nominal shocks? Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, (41), 1-56.

Corden, W. (1984). Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: survey and consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, (36), 359-380.

Corden, W., & Neary, J. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. Economic Journal, (92), 825-848.

De Gregorio, J. (2015). From rapid recovery to slowdown: why recent economic growth in Latin America has been slow. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Francis, M. (2008). Adjusting to the commodity price boom: the experiences of four industrialized countries. Bank of Canada Review, 29-41.

Frankel, J. (2011). How can commodity exporters make fiscal and monetary policy less procyclical? Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP11-015, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.

Frenkel, J., & Razin, A. (1986). Real exchange rates, interest rates and fiscal policies. Economic Studies Quarterly, (37), 99-113.

Gruss, B. (2014). After the boom. Commodity prices and economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean. imf Working Paper 14/154. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Ismail, K. (2010). The structural manifestation of the ‘Dutch disease’: the case of oil exporting countries. imf Working Paper 10/103. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Kilian, L., Rebucci, A., & Spatafora, N. (2009). Oil shocks and external balances. Journal of International Economics, (77), 181-194.

Lippi, F., & Nobili, A. (2012). Oil and the macroeconomy: a quantitative structural analysis. Journal of the European Economic Association, (10), 1059-1083.

Oomes, N., & Kalcheva, K. (2007). Diagnosing Dutch disease: does Russia have the symptoms? imf Working Paper 07/102. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Sachs, J., & Wyplosz, C. (1984). Exchange rate effects of fiscal policy. nber Working Paper 1255.

Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2015). How important are terms of trade shocks? nber Working Paper 21253. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Spatafora, N., & Warner, A. (1999). Macroeconomic and sectoral effects of terms of trade shocks. The experience of the oil exporting developing countries. imf Working Papers 99/134. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Detalles del artículo