Main Article Content

Authors

The observation of similar functional relations under Pavlovian and operant contingencies could support the idea that both respondent and operant behaviors are the result of the same process. The effects of the sequence of exposure to non-contingent and contingent water delivery on the occurrence, temporal distribution, andbehavioral adjustment were assessed. Lights or tones were used as antecedent stimuli between subjects. The required responses under each condition of water delivery (nose-poking and lever-pressing) increased and decreased in correspondence with the ongoing contingency. No differences in the temporal distribution of both responses were observed when they were required by the ongoing contingency. Under both sequences of exposure the behavioral adjustment was higher in the second than in the first condition of water delivery. The results are discussed considering the possibility of a single behavioral process under both conditions of water delivery
Serrano, M., Martinez Montor, D. R., & Montes Castro, E. E. (2015). Distribution and Adjustment of Behavior under Contingent and Non-contingent Conditions of Water Delivery. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 33(02), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl33.02.2015.11

Appel, J. B., & Hiss, R. H. (1962). The discrimination of contingent from non-contingent reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 37-39. doi: 10.1037/h0044613

Cabrer, F., Daza, C., & Ribes, E. (1975). Teoría de la conducta: ¿Nuevos conceptos o nuevos parámetros? Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 1, 191-212.

Cole, M. R. (2001). The long-term effect of high- and low-rate responding histories on fixed-interval responding in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75, 43-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-43

Jenkins, H. M., & Moore, B. R. (1973). The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 163-181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-163

Lattal, K. A., & Maxy, G. C., (1971). Some effects of response independent reinforcers in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16, 225-231. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-225

López, F., & Menez, M. (2012). Transference effects of prior non-contingent reinforcement on the acquisition of temporal control on fixed-interval schedules. Behavioural Processes, 90, 402-407. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.04.007

Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. London: Oxford University Press.

Pear, J. J., & Eldrige, G. D. (1984). The operant-respondent distinction: Future directions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 453-467. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-453

Pulido, M. A., Paz, M., & Sosa, R. (2008). The effects pf behavioral history on response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: A parametric analysis. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 34, 43-56.

Ribes, E., Carpio, C., Pallares, A., & Torres, J. (1986). Efectos de la reducción de la disponibilidad de reforzamiento en un programa temporal señalado. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 12, 127-136.

Ribes, E. (2007). Estados y límites del campo, medios de contacto y análisis molar del comportamiento: Relfexiones teóricas. Acta Comportamentalia, 15, 229-259.

Ribes, E., & López, F. (1985). Teoría de la conducta: Un análisis de campo y paramétrico. México: Trillas.

Seligman, M. E., & Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1-9. doi: 10.1037/h0024514

Serrano, M. (2009). Complejidad e inclusividad progresivas: Algunas implicaciones y evidencias empíricas en el caso de las funciones contextual, suplementaria y selectora. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 35 (MONO), 161-178.

Shapiro, M. M. (1961). Salivary conditioning in dogs during fixed-interval reinforcement contingent upon lever pressing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 361-364. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-361

Skinner, B. F. (1948). “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168-172. doi:10.1037/h0055873

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

Snycersky, S., Laraway, S., Huitema, B. E., & Poling, A. (2004). The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 51-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-51

Staddon, J. E. R., & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). The superstition experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3-43. doi: 10.1037/h0030305

Wanchisen, B. A. (1990). Forgetting the lessons of history. The Behavior Analyst, 13, 31-37.

Wheatley, K. L., Welker, R. L., & Miles, R. C (1977). Acquisition of barpressing in rats following experience with response-independent food. Animal Learning & Behavior, 5, 236-242. doi: 10.3758/BF03209233

Williams, D. R. (1981). Biconditional behavior: Conditioning without constraint. En C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & Gibbon, J. (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 55-99). New York: Academic Press.

Wollin, B. R. (1968). Differences in the manner of pecking a key between pigeons reinforced with food and water. En A. C. Catania (Ed.), Contemporary research in operant behavior (p. 286). Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman.

Zeiler, M. D. (1968). Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 405-414. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-405

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)