Main Article Content

Authors

The partial reinforcement effect (PRE) is observed when a partially reinforced cue shows more extinction resistance than a continuous reinforced cue. In two experiments using a predictive learning task the effect of response mode in PRE was studied. Human participants were trained in a trial-by-trial, phase or global response mode in a predictive task in which they had to predict the probability of an outcome (appearance of a rabbit) following different cues (magic words). During an acquisition phase a cue EC25 was paired with the outcome on 25 % of the trials (partial reinforcement), while cues EC100 and ECcont were paired with the outcome on all the trials (continuous reinforcement) During an extinction phase, cues EC25 and EC100 were extinguished but cue ECcont not. Judgments were required for each cue in the Global group at the end of training, in the  hase group at the end of each phase and in the Trial group, each 3 trials. These results showed PRE for cue EC25 in all groups and can not be explained by associative or probabilistic models.

Angelica Serena Alvarado Garcia, Universidad Autónoma de México

Psicóloga. Doctora en psicología experimental, FES Iztalala, Universidad Autónoma de México

Javier Vila, Universidad Autónoma de México FES iztacala

Psicólogo. Doctor en psicología, FES Iztacala, Universidad Autónoma de México.

Luis J. Lopez Romero, Universidad Autónoma de México

Psicólogo. FES Iztacala, Universidad Autónoma de México.
Alvarado Garcia, A. S., Vila, J., & Lopez Romero, L. J. (2013). Partial reinforcement effect in the extinction of the predictive learning: An evaluation of the response mode. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 31(3), 453–466. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/apl/article/view/2219

Abad, M. J. F., Ramos-Álvarez, M. M. y Rosas, J. M. (2009). Partial reinforcement and context-switch effects in human predictive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 174-188.

Alvarado-García, A., Vila, J & López-Romero, L. (2009). Las instrucciones modulan el efecto del modo de respuesta en el aprendizaje causal. Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, Volumen 1, No. 1, 31-40.

Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.

Amsel, A. (1992). Frustration theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bouton, M. E., & Sunsay, C. (2001). Contextual control of appetitive conditioning: Influence of a contextual stimulus generated by a partial reinforcement procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 109–125.

Capaldi, E. J. (1967). A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 67–156). New York: Academic Press.

Capaldi, E. J. (1994). The sequential view: From rapidly fading stimulus traces to the organization of memory and the abstract concept of number. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 156–181.

Catena, A., Maldonado, A., & Cándido, A. (1998). The effect of frequency of judgement and the type of trials on covariation learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 481-495. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.481

Hall, G. y Honey, R.,C. (1989). Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition and habituation: Associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues. Journal of

Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 16, 271-278.

Hogarth, R., M. y Einhorn, H., J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology. 24, 1-55.

Humphreys, L. G. (1939). The effect of random alternation of reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of conditioned eyelid reactions. Journal of Experimental

Psychology, 25(2), 141-158. doi:10.1037/h0058138.

Jenkins, H. M. (1962). Resistance to extinction when partial reinforcement is followed by regular reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 441-450.

doi:10.1037/h0048700.

Jenkins, W. O., McFann, H., & Clayton, F. L. (1950). A methodological study of extinction following aperiodic and continuous reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and

Physiological Psychology, 43(3), 155-167. doi:10.1037/h0058733.

Matute, H., Vegas, S., & De Marez, P.-J. (2002). Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 714-725. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.714.

Myers, C.,E., Oliver, l., M., Warren, S., G. y Gluck, M., A. (2000). Stimulus exposure effects in human associative learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 53B (2), 173-187.

Olay-Paredes, y Rosas, (1999). Within- subjects extinction and renewal in predictive judgments. Psicológica. 20, 195-210.

Pearce, J. M., Redhead, E. S., & Aydin, A. (1997). Partial reinforcement inappetitive Pavlovian conditioning with rats. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50(B), 274-294.

Rescorla, R. A. (1999). Whitin-subject partial reinforcement extinction in autoshaping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B,75-87.

Rescorla, R.A. & Wagner, A.R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement, En A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy, EdsClassical Conditioning II, pp. 64–99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, NY.

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Oxford, England: Appleton-Century.

Vila, N. J. (2000). Extinción e inhibición en juicios de causalidad. Psicológica, 21(3), 257-273.

Weinstock, S. (1954). Resistance to extinction of a running response following partialreinforcement under widely spaced trials. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 47(4), 318-322.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.