Moral Foundations as Ethical Codes in a Brazilian Context

Joao Wachelke

doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.10460

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

Moral Foundations as Ethical Codes in a Brazilian Context

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.10460

PDF HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Published: Mar 7, 2022

Issue: Vol. 39 No. 3 (2021): Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana

Section Artículos

Keywords: morality , ethics , social psychology , moral foundations moralidad , ética , psicología social , fundaciones morales moralidade , ética , psicologia social , fundações morais

Authors

Joao Wachelke Federal University of Uberlandia

Abstract

We present a survey of Brazilians on their adoption of a set of ethical rules, the moral foundations. The aim of the study is to characterize the profiles of a sample of adults in terms of their reliance on moral foundations, under the assumption that each moral foundation represents an ethical code, considering social variables such as gender, schooling level, and religion. Ethical rules consist in associations of evaluative assessments with systems of practices concerning social relationships, while ethical codes are those rules legitimated by communities’ conventions. We administered an adapted version of
the Moral Foundations Questionnaire to 936 adults in
public places. Results from cluster analysis revealed
the existence of two broad response patterns that we
interpreted as ethical codes, a liberal ethic that prioritizes the individual, associated with higher educational levels, and a pluralistic code that values both individual and group relations, linked to lower schooling. Brazil’s history of inequity and authoritarian relationships explains apparent contradictions in the individualizing pattern, the modernization of the pluralistic code, and their ideological conflict. The discussion focuses on
possible interpretations of the identified codes, commenting on the specificity of the study and limitations of usual survey strategies.

How to Cite

Wachelke, J. (2022). Moral Foundations as Ethical Codes in a Brazilian Context. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.10460

References

Almeida, A. C. (2012). A cabeça do brasileiro. Record.

Almeida, R. (2019). Bolsonaro presidente: Conservadorismo, evangelismo e a crise brasileira. Novos Estudos cebrap, 38(1), 185‒213. https://www.scielo.br/j/nec/a/rTCrZ3gHfM5FjHmzd-48MLYN/abstract/?lang=pt

Arenari, B., & Torres, R. (2012). Os batalhadores e o pentecostalismo: Um encontro entre classe e religião. In J. Souza (Ed.), Os batalhadores brasileiros: nova classe média ou nova classe trabalhadora? (pp. 311‒348). Editora UFMG.

Berk, R. A., & Freedman, D. A. (2003). Statistical assumptions as empirical commitments. In T. G. Bloomberg & S. Cohen (Eds.), Law, punishment and social control: Essays in honor of Sheldon Messinger (pp. 235‒254). Aldine de Gruyter.

Costa Ribeiro, C. A. (2006). Classe, raça e mobilidade social no Brasil. Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 49(4), 833‒873. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582006000400006

DaMatta, R. (1997). Carnavais, malandros e heróis: para uma sociologia do dilema brasileira. Rocco.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

Gloria Filho, M., & Modesto, J. G. (2019). Morality, activism and radicalism in the Brazilian Left and the Brazilian Right. Trends in Psychology, 27(3), 763‒777. https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2019.3-12

Gower, J. C. (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27(4), 857‒871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823

Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55‒130. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4

Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366‒385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

Guerra, V. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). The Community, Autonomy, and Divinity Scale (CADS): A new tool for the cross-cultural study of morality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1), 35‒50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109348919

Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 65‒72.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, (20), 98‒116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind – Volume 3: Foundations and the future (pp. 367‒391).

Oxford University Press. Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2‒3), 110‒119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573

Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. D. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 797‒832). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613‒628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 963‒976. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017423

Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. Basic Books.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [IBGE]. (2019). pnad continua: Educação 2017.

https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101576_informativo.pdf

Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Kohlberg, L. (1992). Psicología del desarrollo moral (Asun Zublaur Zárate, Trans.). Desclée de Brouwer.

Leeuwen, F. van., Koenig, B. L., Graham, J., & Park, J. H. (2014). Moral concerns across the United States: Associations with life-history variables, pathogen prevalence, urbanization, cognitive ability, and social class. Evolution and Human Behavior,

(6), 464‒471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.06.005

Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., & Hornik, K. (2018). Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.7-1.

Marcondes, D. (2007). Apresentação. In D. Marcondes, Textos básicos de ética: De Platão a Foucault (pp. 9‒17). Jorge Zahar.

Miles, A. (2014). Demographic correlates of moral differences in the contemporary United States. Poetics, 46, 75‒88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.09.004

Morris, C. (1964). Signification and significance: A study of the relations of signs and values. MIT Press.

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free Press.

Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53‒65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7

Schwarcz, L. M. (2019). Sobre o autoritarismo brasileiro. Companhia das Letras.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25,1‒65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6

Shweder, R. A. (1990). In defense of moral realism: Reply to Gabennesch. Child Development, 61(6), 2060‒2067. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130859

Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The big three of morality (autonomy, community,

divinity), and the big three explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and Health (pp. 119–169). Routledge.

Silvino, A. M. D, Pilati, R., Keller, V. N., Silva, E. P., Freitas, A. F. P., Silva, J. N., & Lima, M. F. (2016). Adaptação do Questionário dos Fundamentos Morais para o português. Psico-usf, 21(3), 487‒495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712016210304

Souza, J. (2015). A tolice da inteligência brasileira: Ou como um país se deixa manipular pela elite. LeYa.

Vasquez, K., Keltner, D., Ebenbach, D., H., & Banaszynski, T. L. (2001). Cultural variation and similarity in moral rhetorics. Voices from the Philippines and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(1), 93‒120.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032001010

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publcation metrics

474 275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and ensure the journal's right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative “Commons Attribution License” that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal.

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Authors

Downloads

Similar Articles