Análise das evidências sobre julgamento moral e tomada de decisão entre 2005 e 2020

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.10373

Barra lateral de artigos

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Publicado: mar. 17, 2022
Edição: v. 39 n. 3 (2021): Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana
Seção Artículos


Palavras-chave: moral judgment , moral decision making , evidence , content analysis , systematic review juicio moral , toma de decisiones morales , evidencia , análisis de contenido , revisión sistemática julgamento moral , tomada de decisão moral , evidências de validade , análise de conteúdo , revisão sistemática

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

  Jesús Goenaga Universidad de San Buenaventura
Juan Diego Lopera Universidad de Antioquia
Johny Villada Universidad de Antioquia
Resumo

É apresentada uma revisão sistemática de 80 estudos sobre julgamento moral na tomada de decisão moral das ciências cognitivas, publicados entre 2005 e 2020, em inglês e espanhol. Os artigos foram avaliados segundo los níveis de evidência da Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), realizando uma análise metodológica e identificando as seguintes tendências teóricas: neurociências cognitivas, variáveis de influência biológica, psicológica e sociocultural, debate razão vs. intuição, divergência entre julgamento e comportamento moral e compreensão do julgamento moral como um processo de avaliação. Conclui-se que os estudos revisados oferecem representatividade das evidências em níveis explicativos, preferência pelo tipo de pesquisa empírica analítica, manuseio assíduo de variáveis independentes em desenhos experimentais e utilização de instrumentos de dilemas morais e registro eletrofisiológico que oferecem amplas possibilidades inferenciais, entretanto, é necessária maior consistência teórica e metodológica para evitar contradições que dificultam o fortalecimento de modelos teóricos.

Como Citar
Goenaga, J., Lopera, J. D., & Villada, J. . (2022). Análise das evidências sobre julgamento moral e tomada de decisão entre 2005 e 2020. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana , 39(3). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.10373
Referências

Albert, L, S., Reynolds, S., & Turan, B. (2015). Turning inward or focusing out? Navigating theories of interpersonal and ethical cognitions to understand ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2236-2

Avram, M., Gutyrchik, E., Bao, Y., Pöppel, E., Reiser, M., & Blautzik, J. (2013). Neurofunctional correlates of esthetic and moral judgments. Neuroscience Letters, 534(1), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.053

Barque-Duran, A., Pothos, E. M., Hampton, J. A., & Yearsley, J. M. (2017). Contemporary morality: Moral judgments in digital contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 184-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.020

Bartels, D.M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108(2), 381-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001

Bauman, C., & Skitka, L. (2009). In the mind of the perceiver: Psychological implications of moral conviction. En B. Ross (Ed.), Moral judgment and decision making (pp. 339-362). Academic Press.

Caruso, E. M., & Gino, F. (2011). Blind ethics: Closing one’s eyes polarizes moral judgments and discourages dishonest behavior. Cognition, 118(2), 280-285. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.008

Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1249-1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008

Crockett, M. J., Clark, L., Hauser, M. D., & Robbins, T. W. (2010). Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(40), 17433-17438.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009396107

Crockett, M. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Siegel, J. Z., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111,48), 17320-17325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408988111

Culiberg, B., & Bajde, D. (2014). Do you need a receipt? Exploring consumer participation in consumption tax evasion as an ethical dilemma. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 271-282. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1870-4

Cummins, D. D., & Cummins, R. C. (2012). Emotion and deliberative reasoning in moral judgment. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(328), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00328

Dávila, E. A. (2009). Aproximación pragmática a la teoría del juicio moral, desde la crítica a Kohlberg. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 7(2), 1273-1299. http://158.69.118.180/rlcsnj/index.php/Revista-

Latinoamericana/article/view/157

De Freitas, J., & Johnson, S. G. B. (2018). Optimality bias in moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.011

Dedeke, A. (2015). A cognitive-intuitionist model of moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 437-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1965-y

Delgado, V, A., & Ricapa Z., E. (2010). Relación entre los tipos de familia y el nivel de juicio moral en un grupo de estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 13(2), 153-174. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3751515

Djeriouat, H., & Trémolière, B. (2014). The dark triad of personality and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of Honesty/Humility and Harm/Care. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.026

Dungan, J. A., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2019). The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103848

Echavarría, C. V., & Montoya, S. (2006). Moral justifications of the good thing and bad thing in a group of children from violent and non-violent contexts in a city of the Colombian Andean Region. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 9(1), 51-62. http://ref.scielo.org/sqj2nm

Fernández, J., & Villada, J. (2015). Análisis de evidencia en investigaciones sobre toma de decisiones entre 2002 y 2012. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 33(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl33.01.2015.08

Friesdorf, R., Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 696-713. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215575731

Fu, G., Xiao, W. S., Killen, M., & Lee, K. (2014). Moral judgment and its relation to second-order theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2085-2092. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037077

Garrigan, B., Adlam, A. L. R., & Langdon, P. E. (2016). The neural correlates of moral decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis of moral evaluations and response decision judgements. Brain and Cognition, 108, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.07.007

Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015). How foreign language shapes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 8-17. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.02.001

Gold, N., Pulford, B. D., & Colman, A. M. (2015). Do as I say, don’t do as I do: Differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 50-61. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.01.001

Greene, J., Sommerville, R., Nystrom, L., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2001). An fmri investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872

Greene, J. D., Morelli, S., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004

Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart, L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111(3), 364-371. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.001

Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814

Harenski, C., Harenski, K., Shane, M., & Kiehl, K. (2012). Neural development of mentalizing in moral judgment from adolescence to adulthood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 162-173. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.09.002

Holyoak, K.J., & Morrison, R.G. (2012). Thinking and reasoning: A reader’s guide. En K.J. Holyoak & R.G. Morrison (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 1-7). Oxford University Press.

Hommers, W., & Lee, W. Y. (2010). Unifying Kohlberg with information integration: The moral algebra of recompense and of Kohlbergian moral informers. Psicológica, 31(3), 689-706. https://www.uv.es/psicologica/articulos3FM.10/16Hommers.pdf

Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2008). Toward a model of cross-cultural business ethics the impact of individualism and collectivism on the ethical decision-making process. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 293-305.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9888-8

Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). “Utilitarian” judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193-209.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.

Kodapanakkal, R. I., Brandt, M. J., Kogler, C., & Van Beest, I. (2020). Self-interest and data protection drive the adoption and moral acceptability of big data technologies: A conjoint analysis approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106303

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. En D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Reasearch (pp. 664-679). Rend McNally.

Körner, A., & Volk, S. (2014). Concrete and abstract ways to deontology: Cognitive capacity moderates construal level effects on moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.002

Koster-Hale, J., Saxe, R., Dungan, J., & Young, L. L. (2013). Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(14), 5648-5653.

http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207992110

Krebs, D. L. (2008). Morality: An evolutionary account. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00072.x

Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & Fein, D. (2012). Hamilton vs. Kant: Pitting adaptations for altruism against adaptations for moral judgment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.11.002

Lotto, L., Manfrinati, A., & Sarlo, M. (2014). A new set of moral dilemmas: Norms for moral acceptability, decision times, and emotional salience. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1782

Maeda, Y., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2009). Understanding the relationship between moral judgment development and individual characteristics: The role of educational contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 233-247. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0013381

Manly, T., Leonard L., & Riemenschneider, C. (2011). Students’ ethical decision-making in an information technology context: A theory of planned behavior approach. Journal of Information Systems Education, 22(3), 203-214.

http://jise.org/volume22/n3/JISEv22n3p203.html

Manterola, C., & Zavando, D. (2009). Cómo interpretar los “niveles de evidencia” en los diferentes escenarios clínicos. Revista Chilena de Cirugía, 61(6), 582-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-40262009000600017

Mc Danel, M. (2013). Enhancing moral and ethical judgment through the use of case histories: An ethics course for preservice teachers. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 1(7), 93-114.

https://latinjournal.org/index.php/gist/article/view/608

Migliore, S., Curcio, G., Mancini, F., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). Counterfactual thinking in moral judgment: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-7. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00451

Millar, J. C., Turri, J., & Friedman, O. (2014). For the greater goods? Ownership rights and utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 133(1), 79-84. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.018

Monin, B., Pizarro, D., & Beer, J. S. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.99

Montoya, E. R., Terburg, D., Bos, P. A., Will, G.-J., Buskens, V., Raub, W., & van Honk, J. (2013). Testosterone administration modulates moral judgments depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(8), 1362-1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.001

Moran, J. M., Young, L. L., Saxe, R., Lee, S. M., O’Young, D., Mavros, P. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2011). Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2688-2692. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011734108

Narváez, D., & Vaydich, J. L. (2008). Moral development and behaviour under the spotlight of the neurobiological sciences. Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 289-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240802227478

Navarro, M., & Pascual, J. (2003). Psicología clínica basada en pruebas: efecto del tratamiento. Papeles del Psicólogo, 4(85), 11-28. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/778/77808502.pdf

Olivera-laRosa, A., & Rosselló-Mir, J. (2013). On the relationships between disgust and morality: A critical review. Psicothema, 25(2), 222-226. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/9920

Olivera-laRosa, A., & Rosselló-Mir, J. (2014). The new science of moral cognition: The state of the art. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1122-1128. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.166551

Ong, H. H., Mullette-Gillman, O., Kwok, K., & Lim, J. (2014). Moral judgment modulation by disgust is bi-directionally moderated by individual sensitivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00194

Ostrosky-Solís, F., & Vélez García, A. E. (2008). Neurobiología de la sensibilidad moral. Revista Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 8(1), 115-126. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3987515

Parellada, R. (2006). Moral Judgment in states of deliberative equilibrium. Revista de Filosofía, 31(1) 167-180. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/RESF0606120167A

Pastötter, B., Gleixner, S., Neuhauser, T., & Bäuml, K. (2013). To push or not to push affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame. Cognition, 126(3), 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.003

Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163-177. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x

Primo, J. (2003). Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación: el sistema grade. Revista Chilena de Anestesia, 43(4), 357-360. http://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2015.32.6.9381

Provis, C. (2010). Virtuous decision making for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 3-16. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0564-4

Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610-1624.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1610

Rhim, J., Lee, G., & Lee, J.-H. (2020). Human moral reasoning types in autonomous vehicle moral dilemma: A cross-cultural comparison of Korea and Canada. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.010

Robles, V. (2011). La ineficacia de la discusión de dilemas morales en el crecimiento de la competencia moral en trabajadores y estudiantes. Dos casos mexicanos. Revista ces Psicología, 4(2), 47-59. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3817881

Robles, V. (2013). La complementación de la discusión de dilemas con la lectura teórica para una eficaz intervención en el juicio moral. International Journal of Psychological Research, 6(1), 84-93. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2990/299028095010.pdf

Rom, S. C., Weiss, A., & Conway, P. (2017). Judging those who judge: Perceivers infer the roles of affect and cognition underpinning others’ moral dilemma responses. Journal of Experi mental Social Psychology, 69, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.007

Rom, S. C., & Conway, P. (2018). The strategic moral self: Self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.003

Rosas, A. (2007). Las emociones morales como adaptación para la cooperación en dilemas sociales. Ludus Vitalis, 15(28), 97-118. http://www.ludus-vitalis.org/ojs/index.php/ludus/article/view/366

Rosas, A., Caviedes, E., Arciniegas, A., & Arciniegas, A. (2013). ¿Decisión utilitarista decisión aleatoria? Crítica a una tesis atrincherada en la neurociencia cognitiva. Ideas y Valores, 62(153), 179-199.

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4526778

Sachdeva, S., Singh, P., & Medin, D. (2011). Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning. International Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.568486

Sánchez-Meca, J., & Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: herramientas para la práctica profesional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 7-17. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/778/77812441002.pdf

Schoemaker, P. (2004). Forecasting and scenario planning: The challenges of uncertainty. En D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (pp. 297-315). Blackwell Publishing.

Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quartely Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1219-1222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.x

Shenhav, A., & Greene, J. (2010). Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron, 67, 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.020

Slingerland, E. (2011). “Of what use are the odes?” Cognitive science, virtue ethics, and early Confucian ethics. Philosophy East and West, 61(1), 80-109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23015256

Sobral, F., & Islam, G. (2012). Ethically questionable negotiating: The interactive effects of trust, competitiveness, and situation favorability on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1520-2

Sosa, N., & Ríos, K. (2019). The utilitarian scientist: The humanization of scientists in moral dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103818

Starke, K., Ludwig, A., & Brand, M. (2012). Anticipatory stress interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 61-68. http://journal.sjdm.org/11/11729/jdm11729.pdf

Strohminger, N., Lewis, R., & Meyer, D. (2011). Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment. Cognition, 119(2), 295-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.012

Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119(3), 454-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018

Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Mancini, J., & Wicker, B. (2013). Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00250

Terbeck, S., Sylvia, T., Kahane, G., Guy, K., McTavish, S., Sarah, M., & Cowen, P. J. (2013). Beta adrenergic blockade reduces utilitarian judgement. Biological Psychology, 92(2), 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.005

Vélez, A.E., & Ostrosky, F. (2006). From morality to moral emotions. International Journal of Psychology, 41(5), 348-354.

Estatísticas de consulta

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Métricas de publicação

661 231




 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Os autores conservam os direitos de autor e garantem à revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação do trabalho da mesma forma que licenciado sob uma Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a outros compartilhar o trabalho com um reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e a publicação inicial nesta revista. 

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.