Main Article Content

Authors

Taking into account the concept of imagined water communities elaborated by Benedict Anderson (1983) in this paper, we have studied cases about originary communities that have developed identity processes and collective legitimacy forms through the ownership and property of water resources. Through this perspective it was possible to identify how communities located within the State of Mexico territory have gained power and have had empowerment of water resources. These communities have also gained other capabilities such as control, management, access and the collection of water users payment for the drinking water service they receive. Through imagined communities perspective it also helps to identify identity processes and legitimacy processes within originary communities. This paper concludes that access, operation and management of the drinking water supply service by water committees is useful to built water communities that become active participants in the relationship State-nature. This paper was elaborated with information obtained from interviews carried out in 2008, 2009 and 2010 in three communities from the State of Mexico. These communities share similar characteristics in terms of their water management practices.

Citlalli Aidee Becerril-Tinoco, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana

Universidad AutónomaMetropolitana. Unidad Iztapalapa.

Felipe De Alba Murrieta, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana

Profesor-investigador Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Unidad Cuajimalpa.
Becerril-Tinoco, C. A., & De Alba Murrieta, F. (2014). Construction of Water Communities in Mexico. Territorios, (30), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.12804/territ30.2014.08

Alexander, J. C., (2003). The meanings of social life. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

Appuradai, A. (2003). Sovereignty without territoriality: Notes for a postnational geography. En S. Low y D. LawrenceZuniga (eds). The Anthropology of Space and Place: Locating Culture (pp. 337-49). Boston: Blackwell Publishing.

Archer, M. S. (1996). Culture and agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Beccar, L., Boelens, R. y Hoogendam, P. (2002). Water rights and collective action in community irrigation. En R. Boelens y P. Hoogendam (eds). Water rights and empowerment (pp. 1-21). Assen: Van Gorcum.

Becerril-Tinoco, C. A. (2012). Governance of the drinking water supply service: a case study of three Mexican communities (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de East Anglia, Norwich, Reino Unido). Recuperado de https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/42413/

Boelens, R. A. (2008) The rules of the game and the game of the rules: normalization and resistance in Andean water control. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

Boelens, R. y Zwarteveen, M. (2005). Prices and politics in Andean water reforms. Development and Change, 36(4), 735-758.

Davis, D. (2010). Irregular armed forces, shifting patternsof commitment, and fragmented sovereignty in the developing world. Theory and Society, 39(3-4),397-413.

De Alba, F. (abril, 2012). México y los imaginarios de la acción política ‘fuera’ del Estado ¿Cómo analizar la protesta desde sus desplazamientos e identidades locales? European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, (92), 39-58.

Devetak, R. y Higgott, R. (mayo, 1999). Justice unbound? Globalisation, states, and the transformation of the social bond [Working Paper 29/99]. University of Warwick.

Helmke, G. y Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspectives on politics, 2(4), 725-740.

Linklater, A. (1993). The transformation of political community: Ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lynch, O. J. y Talbott (1995). Balancing acts: community-based forest management and national law in Asia and the Pacific. Washington: World Resources Institute.

Matsinhe, N. P., Juízo, D., Macheve, B. y Santos, C. D. (2008). Regulation of formal and informal water service providers in peri-urban areas of Maputo, Mozambique. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 33(8-13), 841-849.

Ostrom, E. (2001). The puzzle of counterproductive property rights reforms: a conceptual analysis. En A. De Janvry, G. Gordillo, J. P. Platteau y E. Sadoulet (eds.). Access to land rural poverty and public action. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354-365.

Sassen, S. (2007). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Schlager, E. y Ostrom, E. (1992). Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land economics, 68(3), 249-262.

Von Benda-Beckmann, F. (1995). Anthropological approaches to property law and economics. European journal of law and economics, 2(4), 309-336. Von Benda-Beckmann, F., Von Benda-Beckmann, K. y Spiertz J. (1998). Equity and legal pluralism: taking customary law into account in natural resource policies. R. Boelens y G. Dávila (eds.). Searching for equity. Conceptions of justice and equity in peasant irrigation. Assen: Van Gorcum.

Zwarteveen, M., Roth, D. y Boelens, R. A. (2005). Water rights and legal pluralism. Beyond analysis and recognition. En D. Roth, R. A. Boelens y M. Zwarteveen (eds.). Liquid relations. Contested water rights and legal complexity (254-278). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.