Geoestrategias de paz y espacios de desenzarzamiento: diferentes procesos, diferentes espacios, a diferentes escalas y con diferentes calendarios

Heriberto Cairo Carou

doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/territorios/a.13796

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

Geostrategies of Peace and Spaces of Disengagement: Different Processes, Different Spaces, Different Scales, Different Timelines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/territorios/a.13796

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España))

Published: Nov 29, 2024

Issue: No. 51-Esp. (2024): Geografías y ecologías de la paz. Los ensamblajes contradictorios de la paz

Section Thematic Section

Keywords: Geostrategy of peace territory place Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones (NWFZ) Zones of Peace (ZofP)

Authors

Heriberto Cairo Carou
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Abstract

Peace is built in specific places, which are not interchangeable, through specific spatial practic-
es that build spatial structures at different scales. There is a large amount of literature on the
processes used to build peace —the how of peacebuilding. However, there is little research that examines the question of where peace and peacebuilding occur. The Nuclear Weapons Free
Zones (NWFZ) and the regional Peace Zones (ZofP) —and also the local ZdeP— are delimited
spaces. That is, they have a mainly territorial character, although not in the usual militaristic
terms because they are all disarmament initiatives, so they are alternative ways of understanding defence. zlan is a concept related to security policy, in fact it is an alternative security policy. In fact, if we understand the territory as a political technology, the NWFZand the Zof P are pacifist political technologies, which stand out among those proposed in this work

How to Cite

Cairo Carou, H. (2024). Geostrategies of Peace and Spaces of Disengagement: Different Processes, Different Spaces, Different Scales, Different Timelines. Territorios, (51-Esp.), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/territorios/a.13796

References

Bey, H. (s. f.). Zona temporalmente autónoma. Merz Mail. https://www.merzmail.net/zona.htm

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

Björkdahl, A. (2023). Spatializing peace and peacebuilding: where is knowledge about peace and peacebuilding produced? In C. Flint & K. E. Dempsey (Eds.), Making geographies of peace and conflict (pp. 54-72). Routledge.

Björkdahl, A., & Kappler, S. (2017). Peacebuilding and spatial transformation: peace, space and place. Routledge.

Bunge, W. (1988). Nuclear war atlas. Blackwell.

Cairo, H. (2021). La geopolítica de la violencia global en el análisis de sistemas mundo: relevancia y problemas. urvIo:

Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, 30, 22-39.

Cairo, H. (2023). Geopolítica de América Latina y el Caribe. Síntesis.

Camargo, D. (2003). Lógicas del poder y regulación de espacios. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Chase-Dunn, C., Kwon, R., Lawrence, K., & Inoue, H. (2011). Last of the hegemons: U.S. decline and global governance. International Review of Modern Sociology, 37(1), 1-29.

Clements, K. P. (2014). Peace, power & politics: how New Zealand became nuclear free. The Journal of Pacific History, 49(4), 518-519.

Clements, K. P., & Ikeda, D. (2019). Towards a century of peace: a dialogue on the role of civil society in peacebuilding. Routledge.

Devere, H., Te Maihāroa, K., Solomon, M., & Wharehoka, M. (2017). Regeneration of Indigenous peace traditions

in Aotearoa New Zealand. In H. Devere, K. Te Maihāroa & J. P. Synott (Eds.), Peacebuilding and the rights of indigenous peoples: experiences and strategies for the 21st century (pp. 53-64). Springer.

Elden, S. (2013). The birth of territory. University of Chicago Press.

Enloe, C. (2016). Globalization & militarism (2a ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Falk, R. (1990). Evasions of sovereignty. In R. B. J. Walker & S. H. Mendlovitz (Eds.), Contending sovereignties: redefining political community (pp. 61-78).

Lynne Rienner Publishers. Flint, C. (2006). Introduction to geopolitics. Routledge.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167-191.

Galtung, J. (1985). Twenty-five years of peace research: ten challenges and some responses. Journal of Peace Research, 22, 141-158.

Galtung, J. (1994). ¿Hay alternativas?: cuatro caminos hacia la paz y la seguridad. Tecnos.

Garcia, E. (1997). Filipino zones of peace. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 9(2), 221-224.

Graham, K. (1987). New Zealand’s non nuclear policy: towards global security. Alternatives, XI(1), 217-242.

Hancock, L. (2017). Agency & peacebuilding: the promise of local zones of peace. Peacebuilding, 5(3), 255-269.

Hancock, L., & Mitchell, C. (2007). Zones of peace. Kumarian Press.

Jones, J. P., Leitner, H., Marston, S. A., & Sheppard, E. (2017). Neil Smith’s scale. Antipode, 49(S1), 138-152.

Kacowicz, A. M. (1995). Explaining zones of peace: democracies as satisfied powers? Journal of Peace Research, 32(3), 265-276.

Kacowicz, A. M. (1998). Zones of peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in comparative perspective. State University of New York Press.

Kaiku, P., & Boie, F. H. (2023). A Pacific “zone of peace”: what will it entail? The Interpreter. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/pacificzone-peace-what-will-it-entail#:~:text=“We%20must%20consider%20the%20Pacific,challenges%20associated%20with%20climate%20change

Kapler, S. (2014). Local agency and peacebuilding. Palgrave Macmillan.

K im, C.-H., & Bueno de Mesquita, B. (2015). Ecological security and the promotion of peace: a dmz eco-peace park. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 27(4), 539-557.

Koga, K. (2014). Institutional transformation of asean: zopfan, tac, and the Bali Concord I in 1968-1976. The Pacific Review, 27(5), 729-753.

Koopman, S. (2011). Let’s take peace to pieces. Political Geography, 30(4), 193-194.

Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.

Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Anthropos.

Lejano, R. P. (2006). Theorizing peace parks: two models of collective action. Journal of Peace Research, 4 3 (5) , 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306066565

Locke, E. (1992). Peace people: a history of peace activities in New Zealand. Hazard Press.

Lopez-Reyes, R. (1997). Establishing Salvadoran zones of peace. Peace Review, 9(2).

Mac Ginty, R. (2008). Indigenous peacemaking versus the liberal peace. Cooperation and Conflict, 43(2), 139-163.

Macaspac, N. (2023). Spatialities of peace zones. Cooperation and Conflict, 58(2), 175-193.

Macaspac, N., & Moore, A. (2022). Peace geographies and the spatial turn in peace and conflict studies: integrating parallel conversations through spatial practices. Geography Compass, 16, e12614.

Mamadouh, V. (2005). Geography and war, geographers and peace. In C. Flint (Ed.), The geography of peace and war: from death camps to diplomats (pp. 26-60). Oxford University Press.

Mamadouh, V. (2023). Geography and war, geographers and peace: expanding research and political agendas. In C. Flint & K. E. Dempsey (Eds.), Making geographies of peace and conflict (pp. 12-36). Routledge.

Megoran, N. (2011). War and peace? An agenda for peace research and practice in geography. Political Geography, 30(4), 178-189.

Mitchell, C., & Nan, S. A. (1997). Local peace zones as institutionalized conflict. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 9(2), 159-162.

Mouly, C., Idler, A., & Garrido, B. (2015). Zones of peace in Colombia’s borderland. International Journal of Peace Studies, 20(1), 51-63.

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (ohchr). (2014). Celac/Zone of peace: “A key step to countering the globalization of militarism”. un Expert. Comunicado de prensa, 3 de febrero. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2014/02/celac-zo-ne-peace-key-step-countering-globali-zation-militarism-un-expert

Pfiffner, S., & Sutton, H. (2013). The gunfree zone: a tool to prevent and reduce armed violence. unoda Occasional Papers Nº 25.

Pitt, D., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (1987). Nuclear free zones. Croom Helm.

Ross, L. (2013). Nuclear-weapon-free cities: the humanitarian imperative to ban nuclear weapons. The Peace Foundation. http://www.peace.net.nz/kiora/community-programmes/peace-cities-programme/nuclear-weapon-free-cities

Sack, R. D. (1983). Human territoriality: a theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73(1), 55-74.

Smith, N. (1996). Spaces of vulnerability: the space of flows and the politics of scale. Critique of Anthropology, 16(1), 63-77.

Smith, N. (2004). Scale bending and the fate of the national. In E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: nature, society, and method (pp. 192-212). Blackwell.

Strother, J. (2015, 24 de mayo). Women peace activists cross Korean DMZ. VOA. https://www.voanews.com/a/women-activists-arrive-in-south-korea-from-north/2787570.html

Swanson, D. (2023). Haga de su ciudad una zona libre de armas nucleares. World Beyond War. https://worldbeyondwar.org/es/make-your-town-a-nuclear-free-zone/

Taylor, P. J. (1991). If cold war is the problem, is hot peace the solution? In N. Kliot & S. Waterman (Eds.), The political geography of conflict and peace (pp. 78-92). Belhaven Press.

Tintín hace campaña para Greenpeace. (1999). Imaginaria, (1). https://imaginaria.com.ar/00/1/tintin.htm

Van den Dungen, P. (2010). Cities of peace. In N. J. Young (Ed.), The Oxford international encyclopedia of peace. Oxford University Press. http://www.otago.ac.nz/library/primo/viewresource.php?.

Villavicencio, G. (2020, 11 de noviembre). Fernand Braudel y la larga duración: el legado de los annales. Ecos: Blog de la División de Historia del cIDe. http://ecos.cide.edu/fernand-braudel-y-la-larga-duracion-el-legado-de-los-annales/#:~:text=El%20principal%20aporte%20del%20trabajo,los%20periodos%20de%20larga%20duración

Vogel, B. (2018). Understanding the impact of geographies and space on the possibilities of peace activism. Cooperation and Conflict, 53(4), 431-448.

Walter, F. (2006). L’historien et les temporalités. In J. Royer Jacques (Ed.), La perception du temps (pp. 95-105). Centre universitaire d’étude des problèmes de l’ énergie.

Warf, B., & Arias, S. (Eds.). (2009). The spatial turn: interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.

Watson, I. (2015). Affirming conflict and identity in the Korean Peace Park (DMZ) proposals. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 16(4), 631-647.

Young, N. J. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford international encyclopedia of peace. Oxford University Press. http://www.otago.ac.nz/library/primo/viewresource.php?.

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publcation metrics

0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.

La revista no cobra cargos por publicar a los autores por el proceso de edición de los artículos.

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Authors

Abstract

Downloads

Similar Articles