Algunas preguntas filosóficas para entender el rol de los árbitros a través de la noción de trato justo y equitativo

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.11735

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF (English) HTML Lector Inteligente ePub

Publicado: mar 2, 2022
Número: Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2022): Arbitraje de inversión
Sección Dossier Arbitraje de Inversión


Palabras clave: derecho de las inversiones solución de controversias inversionista-Estado filosofía del derecho teoría del derecho

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

Javier Echeverri
Práctica de Arbitraje Internacional de Dechert

Resumen

Este artículo explora las posibles maneras en las que los debates filosóficos pueden contribuir a entender el rol de los árbitros y los entes que adjudican disputas internacionales en disciplinas relativas al derecho internacional de las inversiones. Para este fin, el artículo analiza una serie de textos de doctrina y las decisiones de los árbitros en torno al debate sobre el estándar de trato justo y equitativo.

Cómo citar
Echeverri, J. (2022). Algunas preguntas filosóficas para entender el rol de los árbitros a través de la noción de trato justo y equitativo. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.11735
Referencias bibliográfica

Agreement on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments between The Kingdom of Spain and the United Mexican States of June 1995. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/5618/download

Alter, K. J., Helfer, L. R., & Madsen, M. (2016). How context shapes the authority of international courts. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79(1), 1-36. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol79/iss1/1

AWG Group Ltd. v. The Argentine Republic (Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S. A., and Vivendi Universal S. A. v. The Argentine Republic). icsid Case ARB/03/19, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0055.pdf

Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic. icsid Case ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/OnlineAwards/C5/DC507_En.pdf

BayWa R. E. Renewable Energy GmbH and BayWa R. E. Asset Holding GmbH v. Spain. icsid Case ARB/15/16, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Directions on Quantum, 2 December 2019. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/OnlineAwards/C4445/DS15835_En.pdf

Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. (2016). Giving arbitrators carte blanche. Fair and equitable treatment in investment treaties. In C. Lim (Ed.), Alternative visions of the international law on foreign investment: essays in honour of Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah (pp. 324-346). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316488317.013

Blusun S. A., Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v. Italian Republic. icsid Case ARB/14/3, Award, 27 December 2016. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw8967.pdf

British Caribbean Bank Ltd. v. Government of Belize. pca Case 2010-18, Award, 19 December 2014. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw4190.pdf

Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, bivac B.V. v. Republic of Paraguay. icsid Case ARB/07/9, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 May 2009. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0103.pdf

Cairn Energy plc and Cairn uk Holdings Limited (cuhl) v. Republic of India. pca Case 2016-07, Award, 21 December 2020.

CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Republic of Argentina. icsid Case ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/OnlineAwards/C4/DC504_En.pdf

Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.

Douglas, Z. (2006). Nothing if not critical for investment treaty arbitration: Occidental, Eureko and Methanex. Arbitration International, 22(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/22.1.27

Dworkin, R. (1998). Law’s empire. Hart.

Dworkin, R. (2008). Justice in robes. Belknap Harvard.

Dworkin, R. (2013a). Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, R (2013b). A new philosophy for international law. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(1), 2-30.

El Paso Energy International Company v. Argentine Republic. icsid Case ARB/03/15, Award, 31 October 2011. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0270.pdf

Elettronica Sicula S. P. A. (elsi), United States of America v. Italy. Judgment, icj Reports 1989. https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/76/076-19890720-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

European Union and its member States. (2019). Establishing a standing mechanism for the settlement of international investment disputes. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2019/january/tradoc_157631.pdf

Fuller, L. (1963). The morality of law. Yale University Press.

Genin v. Estonia (Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, inc and A. S. Baltoil v. Republic of Estonia). icsid Case ARB/99/2, Award, 25 June 2001. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS /OnlineAwards/C178/DC592_En.pdf

Glencore International A. G. and C. I. Prodeco S. A. v. Republic of Colombia. icsid Case ARB/16/6, Award, 27 August 2019. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10767_0.pdf

Grossman, N. (2013). The normative legitimacy of international courts. Temple Law Review, 86(1), 61. https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1269&context=all_fac

Hart, H. H. (1957). Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 593-629. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338225

Hart, H. L. A. (2015). The concept of law. Oxford University Press.

Jan Oostergetel and Theodora Laurentius v. Slovak Republic, Uncitral. Final Award, 23 April 2012. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0933.pdf

L. F. H. Neer and Pauline Neer (usa) v. United Mexican States, unriaa (15 October 1926). https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_IV/60-66.pdf

Lighthouse Corporation Pty Ltd and Lighthouse Corporation Ltd, ibc v. Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. icsid Case ARB/15/2, Award, 22 December 2017. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/OnlineAwards/C4125/DS10851_En.pdf

Lim, C. L., Ho, J., & Paparinskis, M. (2018). International investment law and arbitration: commentary, awards and other materials. Cambridge University Press.

McLachlan, C., Shore, L., & Weiniger, M. (2017). International investment arbitration: substantive principles. Oxford University Press.

Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Arab Republic of Egypt. pca Case 2012-07, Final Award, 23 December 2019. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw11724.pdf

OECD. (2004). Fair and equitable treatment standard in international investment law. oecd Working Papers on International Investment 2004/03. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/675702255435

Paparinskis, M. (2013). International minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694501.001.0001

Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of 12 December 2015.

Postema, G. J. (1987). “Protestant” interpretation and social practices. Law and Philosophy, 6(3), 283-319. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504600

Romak S. A. (Switzerland) v. Republic of Uzbekistan. pca Case 2007-07/AA280, Award, 26 November 2009. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0716.pdf

Saba Fakes v. Republic of Turkey. icsid Case ARB/07/20, Award, 14 July 2010.

Saluka Investments bv (The Netherlands) v. Czech Republic. pca Case 2001-04, Partial Award, 17 March 2006. https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/880

Shlomo Agon, S., & Benvenisti, E. (2017). The law of strangers: the form and substance of other-regarding international adjudication. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(4), 598-660. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2017-0088

Sisodia, R. S., & Khatana, R. (2019). Standard of review in investment arbitrations and India’s approach towards addressing the legitimacy crisis. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 14(7/8), 366-371.

Sornarajah, M. (2007). The fair and equitable standard of treatment: whose fairness? Whose equity? In F. Ortino et al. (Eds.), Investment treaty law: current issues. II. Nationality and investment treaty claims; fair and equitable treatment in investment treaty law (pp. 167-182). British Institute of International and Comparative Law.

Sornarajah, M. (2010). The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.

STEAG GmbH v. Kingdom of Spain. icsid Case ARB/15/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Principles of Quantum, 8 October 2020.

Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S. A. v. United Mexican States. icsid Case ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/OnlineAwards/C3785/DC4872_Sp.pdf

The Netherlands Model Investment Agreement. (2019). https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/5832/download

Thomas Gosling and others v. Republic of Mauritius. icsid Case ARB/16/32, Award, 18 February 2020. https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw11377.pdf

Tokios Tokelés v. Ukraine. icsid Case ARB/02/18, Award, 26 July 2007. http://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/OnlineAwards/C220/DC2233_En.pdf

United Nations General Assembly. (25 September 2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf

United Nations. (December 4, 1986). Declaration on the Right to Development. https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/drd/drd.html

Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States II. icsid Case ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004.

Estadísticas de consulta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Métricas de publicación

297 89




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.

Bajo la licencia Atribución No Comercial (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Se puede compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra y hacer obras derivadas, siempre y cuando se reconozcan los créditos del autor.