Apoio social, solidão, vulnerabilidade e satisfação com a vida em idosos no México

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.11187

Barra lateral de artigos

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Publicado: sept 9, 2022
Edição: v. 40 n. 2 (2022): Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana
Seção Artículos


Palavras-chave: solidão vulnerabilidade apoio social satisfação com a vida idosos

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

  Patricia Andrade Palos
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  María Enriqueta Sánchez Hernández
Universidad Anáhuac México
  Diana Betancourt Ocampo
Universidad Anáhuac México
Alejandro González-González
Universidad Anáhuac México

Resumo

O objetivo desta pesquisa foi analisar os efeitos diretos e indiretos do apoio social, solidão e vulnerabilidade percebida na satisfação com a vida (SV) de dois grupos de idosos no México, um  grupo entre 60 e 69 anos e outro entre 70 e 99 anos. Contou-se com uma amostra não probabilística de 4.433 idosos, sendo 61.8 % mulheres e 38.2 % homens. Foram utilizados os seguintes instrumentos: a escala de solidão da Universidade da Califórnia; a Escala de Rede Social de Lubben (LSNS-6) para avaliar o suporte social percebido; a Escala de Vulnerabilidade Percebida (PVS) de Myall et al.; a escala Satisfação com a Vida de Diener et al., bem como um questionário sociodemográfico. Os resultados mostraram um bom ajuste dos modelos, onde pode-se observar que para ambos os grupos a variância explicada da sv é maior quando se relaciona apoio social com solidão e vulnerabilidade do que quando se mede o efeito direto do apoio na SV. Esta pesquisa fornece elementos para o desenvolvimento de programas e políticas públicas que contribuam para o bem-estar dos idosos.

Como Citar
Andrade Palos, P., Sánchez Hernández, M. E., Betancourt Ocampo, D., & González-González, A. (2022). Apoio social, solidão, vulnerabilidade e satisfação com a vida em idosos no México. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana , 40(2). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.11187
Referências

Ayla, K., & Kanwal, S. (2018). Levels of loneliness and family structure among geriatrics. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.4172/2475-319X.1000135

Bai, X., Yang, S., & Knapp, M. (2018). Sources and directions of social support and life satisfaction among solitary Chinese older adults in Hong Kong: The mediating role of sense of loneliness. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 13, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S148334

Bajotto, A. P., Garcia, L. F., & Goldim, J. R. (2017). What is vulnerability?” A qualitative study about the perception of vulnerability in adults and older adults. Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics, 8(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000299

Baltes, M., & Carstensen, L. (1996). The process of successful ageing. Ageing & Society, 16(4), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00003603

Barbosa, K. T. F., Oliveira, F. M. R. L. D., & Fernandes, M. D. G. M. (2019). Vulnerability of the elderly: A conceptual analysis. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72, 337-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0728

Bartram, D. (2021). Age and life satisfaction: Getting control variables under control. Sociology, 55(2), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520926871

Brocklehurst, H., & Laurenson, M. (2008). A concept analysis examining the vulnerability of older people. British Journal of Nursing, 17(21), 1354-1357. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.21.31738

Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Journal Indexing & Metrics, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005

Bustamante, A. V., Vilar-Compte, M., & Lagunas, A. O. (2018). Social support and chronic disease management among older adults of Mexican heritage: A us-Mexico perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 216, 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.025

Cappelli, M., Bordonali, A., Giannotti, C., Montecucco, F., Nencioni, A., Odetti, P., & Monacelli, F. (2020). Social vulnerability underlying disability amongst older adults: A systematic review. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 50(6), e13239. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13239

Cárdenas, C. M., & Arancibia, M. H. (2014). Potencia estadística y cálculo del tamaño del efecto en G*Power: complementos a las pruebas de significación estadística y su aplicación en psicología. Salud & Sociedad, 5(2), 210-224.

Celik, S. S., Celik, Y., Hikmet, N., & Khan, M. M. (2018). Factors affecting life satisfaction of older adults in Turkey. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 87(4), 392-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415017740677

Chen, L., Guo, W., & Perez, C. (2021). Social support and life satisfaction of ethnic minority elderly in China. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 92(3), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415019896224

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Consejo Estatal de la Población del Estado de México. (s.f.). Adultos Mayores. Gobierno del Estado de México; EDOMÉX. https://coespo.edomex.gob.mx/adultos_mayores

Cosco, T., Prina, A., Perales, J., Stephan, B., & Brayne, C. (2014). Operational definitions of successful aging: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(3), 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213002287

Depp, C. A., & Jeste, D. V. (2006). Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bc

Diener, E. D., & Suh, M. E. (1998). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. En K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics: Vol. 17. Focus on Emotion and Adult Development (pp. 304-324). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1891/0198-8794.17.1.304

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115

Elmståhl, S., Sanmartin Berglund, J., Fagerström, C., & Ekström, H. (2020). The Life Satisfaction Index-A (LSI-A): Normative data for a general Swedish population aged 60 to 93 Years. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 15, 2031-2039. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S275387

Farriol-Baroni, V., González-García, L., Luque-García, A., Postigo-Zegarra, S., & Pérez-Ruiz, S. (2021). Influence of social support and subjective well-being on the perceived overall health of the elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10). 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105438

Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Zamarrón, M. D., López B. M. D., Molina, M. M. A., Díez, N. J., Montero, L. P., & Schettini. M. R. (2010). Envejecimiento con éxito: criterios y predictores. Psicothema, 22(4), 641-647. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/8930

Foster, L., & Walker, A. (2021). Active ageing across the life course: Towards a comprehensive approach to prevention. BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6650414

González-Zabala, A. (2021). Apoyo social y envejecimiento activo: aproximaciones desde la perspectiva de la psicología positiva. Revista Científica Arbitrada de la Fundación Mente Clara, 6, 239. https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v6.239

Gutiérrez, M., Galiana, L., Tomás, J. M., Sancho, P., & Sanchís, E. (2014). La predicción de la satisfacción con la vida en personas mayores de Angola: el efecto moderador del género. Psychosocial Intervention, 23(1), 17-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/in2014a2

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1999). Análisis multivariante (5ª ed.). Prentice Hall. Hellevik, O. (2017). The U-shaped age-happiness relationship: Real or methodological artifact? Quality & Quantity, 51(1), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0300-3

Hill, R. D., & Smith, D. J. (2015). Positive aging: At the crossroads of positive psychology and geriatric medicine. En P. A. Lichtenberg, B. T. Mast, B. D. Carpenter, & J. Loebach Wetherell (Eds.), APA handbook of clinical geropsychology, Vol. 1: History and status of the field and perspectives on aging (pp. 301-329). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14458-013

Hombrados-Mendieta, I., García-Martín, M. A., & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2013). The relationship between social support, loneliness, and subjective well-being in a Spanish sample from a multidimensional perspective. Social Indicators Research, 114, 1013-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0187-5

Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Huang, F., & Fu, P. (2021). Intergenerational support and subjective wellbeing among oldest-old in China: The moderating role of economic status. BMC Geriatrics, 21, 252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02204-y

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2021, 25 de enero). Censo de población y vivienda 2020. INEGI. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2021/EstSociodemo/ResultCenso2020_Nal.pdf

Khodabakhsh, S. (2021). Factors affecting life satisfaction of older adults in Asia: A systematic review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 1289-1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00433-x

Kim, S., Choe, K., & Lee, K. (2020). Depression, loneliness, social support, activities of daily living, and life satisfaction in older adults at high-risk of dementia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249448

Kocalevent, R. D., Berg, L., Beutel, M. E., Hinz, A., Zenger, M., Härter, M., Nater, U., & Brähler, E. (2018). Social support in the general population: Standardization of the Oslo social support scale (osss-3). bmc Psychology, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0249-9

Kutubaeva, R. Z. (2019). Analysis of life satisfaction of the elderly population on the example of Sweden, Austria and Germany. Population and Economics, 3(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e47192

Laaksonen, S. (2018). A research note: Happiness by age is more complex than U-shaped. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(2), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9830-1

Liang, J., & Luo, B. (2012). Toward a discourse shift in social gerontology: From successful aging to harmonious aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 26(3), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.03.001

Lim, H. J., Min, D. K., Thorpe, L., & Lee, C. H. (2016). Multidimensional construct of life satisfaction in older adults in Korea: A six-year follow-up study. BMC Geriatrics, 16, 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0369-0

Liu, L. H., Kao C. C., & Ying, J. C. (2020). Functional capacity and life satisfaction in older adult residents living in long-term care facilities: The mediator of autonomy. Journal of Nursing Research, 28(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNR.0000000000000362

Lozano, K. D., Montoya, A. B. J., Gaxiola, R. L. S. C., & Román, S. Y. G. (2017). Dependencia funcional y vulnerabilidad social en adultos mayores mexicanos, 2012. Revista Latinoamericana de Población, 11(21), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.31406/relap2017.v11.i2.n21.2

Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., Iliffe, S., Von Renteln Kruse, W., Beck, J. C., & Stuck, A. E. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.4.503

Lučanin, D., Despot Lučanin, J., Košćec Bjelajac, A., & Delale, E. A. (2017). Longitudinal psychosocial predictors of life satisfaction in old persons. En I. Burić (Ed.), 20th Psychology Days in Zadar, book of selected proceedings (pp. 115-125). Department of Psychology, University of Zadar.

Martell, M. J., García-Cadena, C. H., Daniel-González, L., Sánchez, M. P., & Mendoza M. A. (2018). Estructura factorial de la escala de satisfacción con la vida y validez convergente con la escala de calidad de vida en preparatorianos mexicanos. Revista de Psicología y Ciencias del Comportamiento de la Unidad Académica de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, 9(2), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.29365/rpcc.20181207-70

Montoya, A. B. J., & Martínez, E. A. (2018). Perspectivas teórico-metodológicas para el estudio de la vulnerabilidad social en los adultos mayores. Papeles de Población, 24(98), 219-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.22185/24487147.2018.98.41

Moreno-Tamayo, K., Manrique-Espinoza, B., Ramírez-García, E., & Sánchez-García, S. (2020). Social isolation undermines quality of life in older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(11), 1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610219000310

Myall, B. R., Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Brechman-Toussaint, M., & Samuels, C. A. (2009). Assessing individual differences in perceived vulnerability in older adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.015

Ng, S. T., Tey, N. P., & Asadullah, M. N. (2017). What matters for life satisfaction among the oldest-old? Evidence from China. PloS one, 12(2), Artículo e0171799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171799

Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2015). Resumen. Informe mundial sobre el envejecimiento y la salud. Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186471/WHO_FWC_ALC_15.01_spa.pdf

Padrós, B. F., Gutiérrez, H. C. Y., & Medina, C. M. A. (2015). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida (SWLS) de Diener en población de Michoacán (México). Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 33(2), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl33.02.2015.04

Papi, S., & Cheraghi, M. (2021). Multiple factors associated with life satisfaction in older adults. Menopause Review, 20(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2021.107025

Paramio-Pérez G., Jesús, A. B., Hernando, A., & Aguaded, I. (2016). Errores correlacionados y estimación de la fiabilidad en estudios de validación: comentarios al trabajo validación de la escala ehealth literacy (EHEALS) en población universitaria española. Revista Española Salud Pública, 90(9), e1-e2. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1135-57272016000100602

Parra-Rizo, M. A., & Sanchis-Soler, G. (2020). Satisfaction with life, subjective well-being and functional skills in active older adults based on their level of physical activity practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041299

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164

Pfaller, L., & Schweda, M. (2019). Excluded from the good life? An ethical approach to conceptions of active ageing. Social Inclusion, 7(3), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i3.1918

Real Academia Española. (2020). Vulnerabilidad. Diccionario Panhispánico del Español Jurídico. https://dpej.rae.es/

Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(3), 290-294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11

Şahin, D. S., Özer, Ö., & Yanardağ, M. Z. (2019). Perceived social support, quality of life and satisfaction with life in elderly people. Educational Gerontology, 45(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1585065

Sarvimäki, A., & Stenbock-Hult, B. (2016). The meaning of vulnerability to older persons. Nursing Ethics, 23(4), 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014564908

Schwandt, H. (2016). Unmet aspirations as an explanation for the age U-shape in wellbeing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 122, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.11.011

Serrano, G. R. (2018). Adaptación de la escala de Soledad —Loneliness Scale UCLA— en mujeres en situación de violencia del Estado de México. [Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México]. http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/106120/Serrano%20Gonzalez%20Rocio_removed.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Shin, O., Park, S., Kang, J. Y., & Kwak, M. (2021). Types of multidimensional vulnerability and well-being among the retired in the us. Aging & Mental Health, 25(7), 1361-1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1768212

Siette, J., Pomare, C., Dodds, L., Jorgensen, M., Harrigan, N., & Georgiou, A. (2021). A comprehensive overview of social network measures for older adults: A systematic review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 97, Artículo 104525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2021.104525

Simbala-Esperilla, F. Y., & Neira-Mendoza, F. E. (2021). Relación del apoyo social con los niveles de soledad social en adultos mayores en un centro integral municipal del sur peruano. Revista Peruana de Medicina Integrativa, 6(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.26722/rpmi.2021.61.195

Tate, E. (2012). Social vulnerability indices: A comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards, 63, 325-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-

Urtamo, A., Jyväkorpi, S., & Strandberg, T. (2019). Definitions of successful ageing: A brief review of a multidimensional concept. Acta Biomedica, 90(2), 359-363. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i2.8376

Wang, J., Mann, F., Lloyd-Evans, B., Ma, R., & Johnson, S. (2018). Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 18, Artículo 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5

Estatísticas de consulta

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.
Métricas de publicação

1672 840




 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Os autores conservam os direitos de autor e garantem à revista o direito de ser a primeira publicação do trabalho da mesma forma que licenciado sob uma Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a outros compartilhar o trabalho com um reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e a publicação inicial nesta revista.