Main Article Content

Authors

We run an experiment in order to examine 60 Colombian children’s performance on a task that evaluates the use of ‘pure’ geometric maps for locating objects in a 3D space; the task was adapted from Spelke, Gilmore y McCarthy (2011). The experiment aimed to investigate whether or not the children were able to use geometric maps depicted in 2D as representations of real 3D spaces. The experiment also aimed to explore possible changes in the sensitivity to and the use of the Euclidean geometric properties represented on the maps –length, angle and direction-, among three groups of age: four, six and eight-year olds. We aimed at establishing whether there are intergroup differences in the way the three age groups use the three Euclidian properties to locate objects in space, and whether there are differences within the properties. Findings indicated an effect of the age on the children’s performance; the sensitivity to the three properties showed a statistically significant change between the four and the six-year old. Although sensitivity to properties was improved between the six and the eight-year old, we did not find significant changes between these groups of age. We did not find an effect of the type of property on the performance; neither an interaction of property by age. Findings also indicated within-group changes for each property: For the four year-old children the sensitivity to the length was influenced by the condition ‘equal’ or ‘unequal’, the sensitivity to the angle changed depending on the condition ‘acute’, ‘obtuse’ or rectangle’, and being sensitive to the ‘above-below’ sense was significantly different that being sensitive to the ‘left-right’ sense. We established distinctions wi h previous findings and outlined some implications for education.

Silvana de los Ángeles Cortés Arboleda, Universidad del Valle

Psicóloga, Grupo Matemáticas y Cognición

Silvia Patricia Sandoval Valencia, Universidad del Valle

Psicóloga, Grupo Matemáticas y Cognición

Yenny Fabiola Otálora Sevilla, Universidad del Valle

Magíster en Psicología, Grupo Matemáticas y Cognición, Profesora Universidad del Valle

Cortés Arboleda, S. de los Ángeles, Sandoval Valencia, S. P., & Otálora Sevilla, Y. F. (2013). Development of Euclidean geometric knowledge and use of maps. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 31(3), 556–574. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/apl/article/view/2137

Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P. & Spelke, E. (2006).Core Knowledge of Geometry in an Amazonian Indigene Group. Science, 311, (5759), 381 – 384.

DeLoache, J. (1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. Science, 238, 1556-1557

DeLoache, J. (2004). Becoming Symbol-Minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 66-70.

Gregory, E., Landau, B. & McClosky, M. (2011).Representation of object orientation in children: Evidence from mirror-image confusions. Visual Cognition, 19 (8), 1035 – 1062.

Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N. &Vasilyeva, M. (1999).Spatial Scaling in Young Children. Psychological Science, 10, (5), 393 – 398.

Izard, V & Spelke, E. (2009).Development of Sensitivity to Geometry in Visual Forms. Human Evolution, 23, (3), 213 – 248.

Liben, L., & Yekel, C. (1996).Preschoolers' Understanding of Plan and Oblique Maps: The Role of Geometric and Representational Correspondence. Child Development, 67, (6), 2780-2796.

M Nardini, N Burgess, K Breckenridge, J Atkinson (2006). Differential developmental trajectories for egocentric, environmental and intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Cognition, 101, 153-172

Newcombe, N. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Learmonth, A. E. (1999).Infants' coding of location in continuous space. Infant Behavior and Development , 22, 483-510.

Piaget, J & Inhelder, B. (1967). The Child’s Conception of Space. (F.J. Langdon & J.L.Lunzer, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1948)

Shusterman, A., Lee, V. & Spelke, E. (2008).Young children’s spontaneous use of geometry in maps. Developmental Science, F1–F7.

Siegler, R.S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

Slater A., Mattock A., Brown E., Bremner J. G., 1991, Form Perception at Birth: Cohen and Younger (1984) Revisited, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51: 395-406.

Spelke, E., Lee, A. e Izard, V. (2010). Beyond Core Knowledge: Natural Geometry. Cognitive Science, 1-22.

Spelke, E., Gilmore, C. & McCarthy, S. (2011). Kindergarden Children’s Sensitivity to Geometry in Maps. Developmental Science, 14, (4), 809 – 821.

Uttal, D. (1994). Preschooler´s and Adults’ Scale Translation and Reconstruction of Spatial Information Acquired from Maps. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 259-275.

Uttal, D. (1996). Angles and Distances: Children´s and Adult´s Reconstruction and Scaling of Spatial Configurations. Child Development, 67, 2763-2779.

Uttal, D. (2000). Seeing the big picture: map use and the development of special cognition. Development Science, 247-286.

Vasilyeva, M. & Bowers, E. (2006).Children's Use of Geometry Information in Mapping Task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 255 - 277.

Vasilyeva, M. & Huttenlocher, J. (2004).Early Development of Scaling Ability, Developmental Psychology, 40 (5), 682 – 690.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.