Review Form

Review format - ANIDIP

Date of form receipt:

Date of form submission to ANIDIP:

Paper title:

Peer’s information

Full name

Identity document      Number          

            Type    Citizenship card ( ) Foreign identification card ( ) Passport ( )

Highest level of education     Doctorate ( ) Master’s Degree ( ) Major ( ) Undergraduate degree ( )

Degree’s field of knowledge

Specific field of knowledge in which you are an expert      

Is your resume on the Colombian ScienTI? Yes ( ) No ( )

Email address

Landline                     Mobile phone

Please select the score you consider applicable to the following concepts, 1 being the highest and 5 the lowest:

  1. Conceptual value of the thesis put forward in the essay
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Clarity of the proposal:
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Innovative character of the thesis:
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Conceptual value of the arguments presented in support of the thesis:
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Argument thoroughness:
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Innovative nature of arguments (beyond analyzing the arguments presented by other authors).
    • Very high
    • High
    • Mid
    • Low
    • Very lowComments:
  1. Logical link between the thesis put forward and the supporting arguments developed.
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Citation of the most relevant academic sources.
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Variety of international legislative, case law, and doctrine sources (and national when relevant).
    • Very high
    • High
    • Average
    • Low
    • Very low

Comments:

  1. Final article rating based on your assessment:
    • Excellent
    • Good
    • Acceptable
    • Poor
    • Very poor

Comments

  1. In your opinion, is the article worth publishing?
    • It is worthy of publication.
    • It is worthy of publication provided some changes are made.
    • Suitable for publication only if substantial improvements are made.
    • Not worthy of publication.
    • By no means should this article be published.

Comments

  1. In case of recommending its publication, which modifications need to be made?